perceiving others Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

person perception

A
  • impression formation
  • social perception
  • social judgement
  • social cognition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Gustav Ichheiser (1897-1969)

A
  • one of the first person to talk about social perception
  • “If people who do not understand each other at least understand that they understand each other better than when, not understanding each other, they do not even understand that they do not understand each other”
  • Ichhesier, 1949: Misunderstandings in human relations. A study of false social perception, p. 37
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the raw material of social perception - Ichheiser, 1949

A
  • what do we have to go on:
  • physical appearance
  • behaviour - how they are behaving
  • situational factors - e.g., where you live, your friends, your job
  • communications from other people - tell us about that person
  • communications from the person themselves
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

typology of personality misinterpretations - Ichheiser, 1949

A
  • The tendency to overestimate the unity of personality
  • Success and failure as sources of misinterpretations
  • Stereotyped classifications as sources of misinterpretations
  • Limits of insights as sources of misinterpretation
  • Mechanisms of rigidity
  • The tendency to overestimate the role of personal and to underestimate the role of situational factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Solomon Asch (1907-1996)

A
  • “We look at a person and immediately a certain impression of his character forms itself in us. A glance, a few spoken words are sufficient to tell us a story about a highly complex matter. We know that such impressions form with remarkable rapidity and with great ease.”
  • Asch, 1946: Forming impressions of personality, p.258
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

primacy effects

A
  • Asch 91946), Experiment 6:
  • Lists of traits of two individuals:
    • Target A: intelligent-industrious-impulsive-critical-stubborn-industrious-envious
    • Target B: envious-stubborn-critical-impulsive-industrious-intelligent
  • What do you think of these two people?
  • A: “The person is intelligent and fortunately he puts his intelligence to work. That he is stubborn and impulsive may be due to the fact that he knows what he is saying and what he means and will not therefore give in easily to someone else’s idea which he disagrees with.”
  • B: “This person’s good qualities such as industry and intelligence are bound to be restricted by jealousy and stubbornness. The person is emotional. He is unsuccessful because he is weak and allows his bad
    points to cover up his good ones.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

central traits

A
  • Asch (1946), Experiment 1
  • Lists of traits of two individuals:
    • Target A: intelligent-skillful-industrious-warm-determined-practical-cautious.
    • Target B: intelligent-skillful-industrious-cold-determined-practical-cautious.
  • What do you think of these two people?
  • Target A - “A person who believes certain things to be right, wants others to see his point, would be sincere in an argument and would like to see his point won.”
  • Target B - “A rather snobbish person who feels that his success and
    intelligence set him apart from the run-of-the-mill individual. Calculating and unsympathetic.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

warmth and competence

A
  • “fundamental” or “universal” dimensions of social judgement, social cognition and stereotype content (Fiske, Buddy and Click, 2007)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Fritz Heider (1896-1988)

A
  • ‘It seems that behaviour in particular has such salient properties it tends to engulf the total field rather than be confined to its proper position as a local stimulus whose interpretation requires the additional data of a surrounding field’
  • Heider, 1958: the psychology of interpersonal relations p.54
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

attribution theory

A
  • Heider (1958) idea of “naïve psychology”
  • Attribution theory is concerned with how people make casual explanations for their own and others’ behaviour (Kelley, 1973).
    • “Attempts of ordinary people to understand the causes and implications of the events they witness” (Ross, 1977, p.174).
      • Focused on how we as social perceivers use information to arrive at these casual explanations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

types of attribution

A
  • Dispositional vs situational attribution:
    • “Jill bought the house because she wanted privacy” = internal/dispositional attribution
      • “Jack bought the house because it was so secluded” = external/situational attribution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

correspondent inference theory

A
  • Concerned with the conditions under which people will make dispositional attributions of others’ behaviour (Jones and Davis, 1965).
    • Choice
    • Social desirability
      • Social roles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Example study - Jones and Harris (1967) and the attitude attribution paradigm

A
  • Participants (N = 41) read essays on Castro’s Cuba.
  • Informed that a student had written the essay in response to the following instructions:
    • either (a) “Based on the past week’s discussion and lectures, write a short cogent criticism of Castro’s Cuba as if you were giving the opening statement in a debate”
    • or (b) “…short cogent defence of Castro’s Cuba as if…”
    • or (c) “…. short cogent essay either defending or criticizing Castro’s Cuba as if …”.
  • 200-word pro-Castro or anti-Castro essay
  • Asked to judge characteristics of author and estimate their true attitude towards Castro
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

correspondence bias

A
  • “The tendency to draw inferences about a person’s unique and enduring dispositions from behaviours that can be entirely explained by the situations in which they occur”
  • Gilbert and Malone, 1995, p.21
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

fundamental attribution error

A
  • “The tendency for attributers to underestimate the impact of situational factors and to overestimate the role of dispositional factors in controlling behaviour”
  • Ross, 1977, p.183
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

cognitive load

A
  • Gilbert and Malone (1995) suggest attribution processes happen in two stages:
    • Dispositional inference (automatic and instant)
    • Situational correction (takes effort and attention)
  • Increases in cognitive load (e.g., via distraction tasks) can undermine situational correction.
  • Cognitive load increases dispositional inference.
17
Q

not so fundamental

A
  • More situational inferences among:
    • Liberals vs conservatives (Skitka et al, 2002)
    • Asian vs North American participants (Miller, 1984; Morris and Peng, 1994).
  • Possible explanations:
    • Different automatic inferences
    • Motivated correction
    • Holistic thinking
      • Group-agency beliefs
18
Q

Thomas theorem

A
  • “If men [sic] define situations as real, they are real in their consequences.”
  • Thomas and Thomas, 1928: the child in America: behaviour problems and programs, p.572
19
Q

self-fulfilling prophecies

A
  • “The self-fulfilling prophecy is, in the beginning, a false definition of the situation evoking a new behaviour which makes the original false conception come ‘true’.
  • This specious validity of the self-fulfilling prophecy perpetuates a reign of error. For the prophet will cite the actual course of events as proof that he was right from the very beginning”
  • Merton, 1968, p. 477
20
Q

pygmalion in the classroom

A
  • Notorious study (Rosenthal and Jacobson, 1968)
  • Told primary teachers some students would be “growth spurters” in scholastic achievement
    • Fake “Harvard Test of Inflected Acquisition”
    • Actually randomly assigned
    • Children labelled as “growth spurters” showed significant gains in IQ compared to peers.
      • Strongest effects in youngest age groups.
21
Q

behavioural confirmation

A
  • Experimental study of self-fulfilling prophecies
    • Male studnets (N=108) in groups of three
    • (1) labelling perceiver, (2) target, (3) naïve perceiver
  • Target labelled as “hostile” vs “non-hostile”
    • Based on fake survey of labelling perceiver and target
    • Additional attribution manipulation … (2x2 design)
  • Behavioural measure of hostility
    • ‘noise weapon’ in reaction time task
    • Labelling perciever records impression of target
  • Snyder and Swann, 1978
22
Q

behavioural confirmation 2

A
  • Attribution manipulation:
    • Disposition attribution (use of the noise weapon reflects their ‘own personal characteristics’)
    • Situation attribution (use of the noise weapon reflects the way their opponent treats them).
  • Second reaction time task with naïve perceiver:
    • Use of noise weapon recorded
      • Naïve perceiver records impression of target
23
Q

behavioural confirmation 3

A
  • Similar findings with other dimensions:
  • Attractiveness stereotypes (Snyder, Tanke and Berscheid, 1977):
    • ‘Male’ percievers and ‘female’ targets in audio conversation
    • Males photographed and shown false photo of female target.
    • Attractive photo -> more sociable behaviour
  • Gender stereotypes (Skrypnek and Snyder, 1982)
  • Ethnic stereotypes (Chen and Bargh, 1997)
  • Extraversion (Fazio et al, 1981)
  • Age and task difficulty (Mussed and Graziano, 1991)
  • Basketball ability (Weaver et al, 2016)
24
Q

summary

A
  • Person perception is often inaccurate or biased:
    • Ichheiser suggests that misperception is widespread
    • Impressions depend on order of information
    • Impressions strongly influenced by ‘central traits’
  • Attributions are often oversimplified:
    • Focus on simple dispositional inferences
    • Correct for complex situations only if resources
  • Initially false perceptions of others can become self-fulfilling via behavioural confirmation.