Patient Dose calculation systems Flashcards

1
Q

Purpose of independent dose calc system (x2)

A
  • Independent check of treatment planning
  • Used for patient treatments that don’t require full modelling in TPS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Method for factor based dose calc

A
  1. Assume patient is rectangle and hetrogen
  2. Identify all differences from reference conditions to treatment conditions
  3. Calculate/measure factors for each difference
  4. Select appropriate factors for patient set-up
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Beam Size factors (x4)

A
  1. St - total scatter factor
  2. Sc - collimator scattor
  3. Sp - phantom scatter
  4. TPR - quantify scatter at depth for different beam sizes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Facots for MLC shape

A
  1. TPR
  2. PDD
  3. Physical depth
  4. Radiological depth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Factors for missing tissue

A
  1. St
  2. Sp
  3. TPR
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Factors for Heterogeneity

A
  1. TPR
  2. PDD
  3. Physical depth
  4. Radiological depth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Factors for wedged isodose

A

Wedge attenuation factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Factors for Setup type (iso vs SSD)

A

ISO - Dref,iso

SSD - Dref,SSD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ESTRO dose calc principle to get from reference to idealised patient conditions (4 steps)

A

REFERENCE

  1. Remove scattering vol:
  2. Introduce head scatter for beam size:
  3. Introduce patient scatter for beam size:
  4. Introduce depth dose ratio:

IDEALISED PATIENT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ESTRO removal of scattering volume

A
  • 1/V
  • V - Volume scatter ratio - ratio of absorbed dose in fill scatter conditions to the dose in miniphantom at same beam size c and depth z
  • The traction of the additional dose to the calc point introduced by the rest of the phantom
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ESTRO in-air ouput factor

A
  • Output ratio in miniphantom, O
    • Ratio of absorbed dose at reference depth for beam size c to dose at same depth for reference beam size cR.
    • Represents change in dose in miniphantom from LINAC when collimator is changed from reference
    • i.e. keep everything the same, chnage the collimator size, what happens to your measurement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ESTRO Volume Scatter ratio

A
  • Volume scatte ratio for colimator setting
  • Fraction of additional dose at treatment collimator setting introduced by including the rest of the phantom
    *
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ESTRO TPR

A
  • Ratio of dose at depth z to dose at reference depth zref for treatment collimator setting c.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

2 problems with ESTRO formalism

A
  1. Volume scatter ratios used in all formulae - v is not easily measurable
  2. Extensions to 100cm SSD and extended SSD have beam size defined at surface - formalism is different and more complex
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why is it hard to measure V?

How do you measure it?

A

Problem:

  • Miniphantom and full scatter water tank measurements in same session
  • Same chamber and same orientation
  • Direct dose measurements

Solution:

  • Since V is only ever used as a raito, measre ratios of dose.
  • Equivelent to Sp for unwedged beams
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why is ESTRO formalism of defining beam size difficult?

What’s the soln

A

Problem

  • Hard to extend to fixed SSD where beam size is defined at surface
  • Have to use confusing set of nomenclature for both

Solution

  • Always define beam size at isocentre (collimator setting)
  • Measure all fixed SSD as function of beam size
  • Unify isocentric and fixed SSD formalisms to remove a set of nomenclature