Paradigms in Conserva/on Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Graeme Caughley defined what two

paradigms in conservation?

A

Declining population paradigm
&
Small population paradigm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Declining population paradigm

A

identify causes of decline.
–  prescribe solution species by species.
–  “essentially humdrum”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Small population paradigm

A
–  treats population “smallness”
 as cause 
of extinction. 
     *Inbreeding, alee effect,            genetic drift, 
etc. 
–  answers “trivial question” of how long 
a population will last if nothing 
happens…
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Strengths of basic

sciences

A
– Theory oriented. 
– Perceptions on evolutionary time scale. 
– Concepts of temporal and 
spatial scales. 
– Focus on game and 
nongame species.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Weaknesses of basic sciences

A

–  Lacked contact with on-the-ground managers
–  Accused of being too theoretical
•  Simplified computer simulations were initial focus of much work.
•  Information transference from theory to application was often ignored.
–  Somehow ignored existence of Biological Conservation…
•  1985 Jared Diamond and Peter
Brussard suggested the need for a new Society and journal to do what
was being done with Biological
Conservation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Strengths – Applied Sciences

A
Perceived wisdom 
•  TWS 50 years older than SCB. 
•  TWS on-the-ground 
management experience. 
– Rooted in population biology. 
•  Historic game management focus. 
•  Historic furbearer focus. 
– Contact with wildlife managers.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Weaknesses - applied sciences

A

–  Long-term focus on game species issues.
•  With, K. A. 1997. The theory of Conservation Biology. Conservation
Biology:1436-1440.
–  Analysis of publications of TWS over time. Found long tradition of studying game species in North America.
•  Exceptions
–  Noted ecologists published from wildlife platforms. e.g. John Wiens as a scientist at Oregon State University

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Conservation Biology

A
Founded and driven by academicians transferring “pure science” to “applied science.”
– Focus on biodiversity. 
– Focus on keeping 
evolutionary processes 
functioning. 
– Implied discontent with 
traditional approaches.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Small population

paradigm.

A

“risk of extinction inherent in low numbers”

  • Rareness alone is the cause of
    extinction.
  • Island species.
  • Zoo species.
  •  Extinction vortex…
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Declining population

paradigm.

A

Focused on detecting,
diagnosing and halting
population decline.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

After a population was small forces different from those acting on -?- become important.

A

large

populations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The development of techniques to study the

small population forces was done primarily by ?

A
basic science departments 
in North America, and in 
captive breeding 
institutions (Smithsonian 
CRC).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

INTERNAL CAUSE =

A

Small Population Paradigm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If enough factors accumulate,

then a species can enter the

A

Extinction Vortex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If enough factors accumulate,

then a species can enter the?

A

Extinction Vortex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Factors of the Extinction Vortex

A

-Human impacts
– Inbreeding effects
–  Demographic fluctuation

17
Q

What happens in an Extinction Vortex?

A

Factors snowball and drive a

species to extinction quickly.

18
Q

“Minimum Viable Population”

A

Population below which extinction vortex will occur

occurs was defined as the

19
Q

Small Population Paradigm is Largely defined by what methods?

A
--Stochasticity 
–  Genetics 
–  Metapopulations 
–  MVP 
–  Effective population size Ne 
–  PVA 
– Captive breeding 
–  Decision analysis 
– Reserve design
20
Q

Small population Paradigm– Stochastic Factors

A
  • Demographic stochasticity.

* Environmental stochasticity

21
Q

Demographic stochasticity.

A

Difference in deterministic
and stochastic models?
•  Deterministic.
•  Stochastic

22
Q

Environmental

stochasticity

A

Many, many, many
publications based on
simulations….

23
Q

Small population Paradigm Heterozygosity / Genetic diversity

A
– Heterozygosity and 
fitness… 
– Genetic drift (think 
captive) 
•  Population bottlenecks 
•  Founder effects 
– Inbreeding 
•  Inbreeding depression 
•  Outbreeding depression
24
Q

What is a metapopulation?

A

?

25
Q

metapopulation implications for conservation:

A

– Reserve design (SLOSS)
– Landscape configuration
(corridors)
– Captive populations

26
Q

Minimum Viable Population

A

Minimum Viable Population

27
Q

Under the MVP threshold,

A

multiple
factors interact to cause reduce the
viability of the population.

28
Q

Ne

A

Effective Population Size

29
Q

Viability of a Population

A
  • Probability of extinction
    •  Time frame
      •  Population size