Paper 3: Forensic psychology Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Offender profiling

Aims to narrow the list of suspects?

A
  • Main aim of offender profiling is to narrow the list of likely suspects.
  • Professional profilers employed to work alongside the police especially in high-profile murder cases.
  • Scene and evidence analysed to generate hypotheses about probable characteristics of offender.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Top-down approach

FBI data?

A
  • FBI interviewed 36 sexually-motivated murderers and used data, together with characteristics of crimes to create two categories: organised and disorganised.
  • If data crime scene matched some of characteristics one category could predict other likely characteristics.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Offender types based on ‘ways of working’?

A
  • Organised and disorganised distinction is based on idea that offenders have certain signature ‘ways of working’.
  • Generally correlate with particular set of social and psychological characteristics that relate to the individual.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Organised?

Targets victim, controlled, higher IQ

A
  • Evidence of planning crime e.g. targeted or ‘type’ of victim
  • High degree of control during crime and little evidence
  • Usually married and may have children
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Disorganised?

Impulsive, lower IQ

A
  • Little evidence of planning i.e. event may be spontaneous
  • Crime reflects impulsive nature e.g. body still at scene
  • Below average IG, may be in unskilled work
  • History of failed relationships, sexual dysfunction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Four stage of FBI profile construction?

A
  1. Data assimilation - review of evidence
  2. Crime scene classification - organised/disorganised
  3. Crime reconstruction - generation of hypotheses about behaviour and events
  4. Profile generation - generation of hypotheses about offender.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(AO3)

Research support for top down organised?

A

P - Study looked at 100 US serial killings. Smallest space analysis used asses co-occurence of 39 aspects.
E/E - Analysis revealed subset of behaviours many serial killings match FBI typology for organised offenders.
L - Suggests key component of FBI typology approach has some validity.
Counter: some argue most killers have multiple contrasting characteristics and don’t fit into one ‘type’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(AO3)

Top down approach adapted to other crimes?

A

P - reports top-down recently been applied to burglary leading to an 85% rise in solved cases in three US states.
E/E- Detection method adds two new categories. Interpersonal and opportunistic.
L - Suggests top-down profiling wider application than originally assumed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(AO3)

Top-down evidence flawed?

A

P - some argue FBI agents did not select a random or even large sample, nor did it include different kinds of of offender.
E/E- No standard set of questions so each interview was different and not comparable.
L - Suggests top-down not have sound scientific basis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Investigative psychology:

Bottom up approach.
Offender profile emerges based on data?

A
  • Unlike US, British model does not begin with fixed typologies. Profile ‘data-driven’ and emerges as investigator looks at details of offence.
  • Aim is to generate pic. of offenders characteristics, routines and background.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Investigative psychology:

Statistical analysis of crime scene evidence?

A
  • Statistical procedures dated patterns of behaviour that are likely to occur across crimes.
  • Done to develop statistical ‘database’ which acts baseline for comparison.
  • Features of offence can be matched against this database suggest potential details about offender.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Investigative psychology:

Analysis based on psychological concepts e.g. interpersonal coherence?

A
  • central concept is interpersonal coherence, way an offender behaves at scene may reflect their behaviour in everyday situations.
  • Might tell police something about how offender relates to women more generally.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Geographical profiling:

Inferences about the offender based on location?

A
  • location of crime scenes used to infer the likely home or operational base of an offender = crime mapping
  • Serial offenders restrict ‘work’ to areas they are familiar with (spatial consistency). Location also be used alongside psychological theory to create hypotheses about offender and their modus operandi.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Geographical profiling:

Marauder and commuter types of offender?

A
  1. The marauder - operates close to their home base

2. The commuter - likely to have travelled a distance away from their usual residence when committing a crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Geographical profiling:

Circle theory uses offending locations?

A
  • pattern of offending locations likely to form a circle around offenders usual residence.
  • Offenders spatial decision, making can provide insight into the nature of the offence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

16 marker on bottom up approach?

A

AO1: No fixed typologies. ‘Data-driven’. Picture characteristics. Statistical analysis. Co-occurence. Behaviour at the scene reflect everyday.
- ‘crime mapping’. Marauder and Commuter. Circle theory.

AO3: Support investigative. 66 sexual assaults, smallest space analysis. Pattern behaviours. Linkage. Supports people are consistent.
Counter: only solved crimes studied, may be more straightforward ones.

A03: Support geographical. 120 murder cases in US, smallest space analysis. Consistency, ‘centre of gravity’. Circular effect.

AO3: Geographical not sufficient on its own. Recording crime not accurate. 75% not reported. Geog. alone not lead to capturing suspect.

17
Q

16 marker: Psychological explanations - Eysenck’s theory

A

AO1: Three dimensions = introversion - extraversion, Neuroticism - stability, Psychotics’ - sociability. Innate. Extraverts have underachieve nervous system - seek excitement, risk-taking. Neurotic individuals high levels of reactivity in sympathetic. - Jumpy etc.

  • Psychotic individual high testosterone. ‘cold’.
  • High E + N scores had nervous systems made it difficult to learn. Anti-social.
  • EPQ = E,N,P Dimensions

AO3: Support. Comparison of 2070 male prisoners scores on EPQ with 2422 male controls. E,N,P prisoners scored higher average than controls. Rates higher than average three dimensions.

AO3: Limitation that all offending based on personality. Offending behaviour occurs in adolescence continues into adulthood. Persistence in offending behaviour to be reciprocal process between individual personality traits and environment. More complex than suggested.

AO3: Cultural factors not taken into account. Study on hispanic and African-American offenders divided into 6 groups based on history + offence. All less extravert than non-offender control group. Sample diff. Low generalisability.

18
Q

16 Marker: Psychological - Differential association

A

AO1: Sutherland developed scientific principles could explain all types of offending. Who you associate with. Learned attitudes towards offending. Learning specific offending acts. Certain values + attributes pro-crime. Particular techniques. Mathematically predict likely hood. Frequency, intensity and duration. Prisoners re-offend.

AO3: Shift of focus. Move away from other theories. Draws attention to deviant social circumstances + environments more to blame. Realistic solution instead punishment.
Counter: Risks stereotyping. Ignores those who may choose not to offend.

AO3: Wider application. Crimes in inner city - working class and affluent groups. ‘White collar’ or corporate offences, feature middle-class groups share deviant norms.

AO3: Testing theory’s precautions. Promised scientific and mathematical framework, but concepts can’t be operationalised. Reduce scientific credibility.

19
Q

16 marker: Psychological - Cognitive explanations.

A

AO1: Child. get older decisions and judgements more sophisticated. Kohlberg - moral development. Moral dilemma technique found offenders at pre-convential level. - Need avoid punishment + gain rewards. - Less mature, childlike. Self-centred + display poorer social perspective.
Cognitive distortions:
- Errors or biases in info. processing characterised by faulty thinking. More typical for offenders. Misread non-aggressive cues - trigger violent response. Minimalisation reduces sense of guilt - downplaying significance of crime.

AO3: Evidence support for moral. Study compared moral, of offenders + non. on SRM-SF scale (11 moral dilemmas). Less mature moral. than non-offending group. Consistent with Kohlberg’s theory. Validity.

AO3: Moral. may depend on type of offence. Study found those crimes for financial gain more likely pre-conventional level than impulsive crime. Pre-associated with crime in offenders believe have good chance evading punishment. Theory not apply to all.

AO3: Cog. application to theory. ‘Face up’ to what done. Studies reduce denial + minimisation associated with less re-offending. Theory of cog. has practical value.