Paper 2: Research Methods Flashcards
What is an aim? (1 mark?)
The aim is what the researcher intends to study. (1 mark)
Where can aims come from? (3 marks)
- Researchers interests & prior research
- Other research studies
- From a theory or practical problem
Describe naturalistic observations.
- Takes place in natural settings.
- Aspects of the environment are NOT interfered with by the researcher
Evaluate naturalistic observations
✅ - Tend to be high in ecological validity as there’s no intervention and results can be generalised to everyday life.
❌- Extraneous variables that might affect what is being observed.
Describe controlled observations
- Used when it’d useful to control certain aspects of the research.
- There’s some control over variables, including the manipulation of variables to observe effects and the control of any extraneous variables
Evaluate controlled observations
Evaluate controlled observations
✅ - Extraneous variables may be less of a problem so replication of the observation becomes easier.
❌- May not produces findings that cannot be applied to everyday life and the research is not completely natural
What’s an example of controlled observations?
An example of a controlled observation is Ainsworth’s Strange Situation
Describe covert observations
- Participants are not fully aware that they’re being studied. Researchers may use one-way mirrors or examine behaviour from across a room or from a balcony etc..
Evaluate covert observations.
✅- The fact that participants don’t know they’re being observed means there’s no participant research. Behaviour observed will be natural which increases the validity of the data gathered.
❌- Theres ethical issues with observing people without getting their consent first!
Describe participant observations.
- The observer is also a participant in the activity being studied.
- The type of observation can be useful because it provides more insights about behaviour.
Evaluate participant observations
✅- The researcher gets to experience the situations like that participants do. This gives them a lot of insight into what’s being observed. This increases the validity of the findings.
❌- There’s a risk of the researcher ‘going native’ when the researchers identifies too strongly with the people they’re
studying. They become like a participant and the observation is less objective. (ie researchers joins a gang and they get too involved into gang culture and forget they’re a researcher)
What’s an example of a participant observation?
A non psychology student observing a psychology class and joins in as if they did study Psychology.
Describe non-participant observations
The researcher does not join in with the activity being observed.
Evaluate non participants observations
✅Thered less chance of the researcher going native and the observation remains objective.
❌Thé observation may not give real insight into the lives of those being studied as the observes removed from the people and the behaviours that are being observed
Evaluate ouvert observations
✅Less ethical issues as consent has been given
❌Rhe fact people know they’re
being observed might affect their behaviour making the results invalid