Paper 2 Families And Households & beliefs Flashcards
what do functionalists think of the family
functionalists view society as a body, a collection of separate systems working together to maintain the whole. they view the family as an integral system to keep society functioning.
what do postmodernists believe
believe that we are in a new era and have greater freedom to choose our own identities, families, etc.
what does the personal life theory think of the family
the personal life approach recognises that the family is not the only significant relationship in people’s lives. It’s common for people to be estranged from their family or not have a family at all. Their identity or sense of belonging comes from other meaningful relationships
DIFFERENT TYPES OF FAMILY
define cohabitation
families that live together but or not married or ina civil partnership
DIFFERENT TYPES OF FAMILY
define an extended family
families that live with extended relatives - grandparents
DIFFERENT TYPES OF FAMILY
define a lone parent
a single parent with one or more children
DIFFERENT TYPES OF FAMILY
define a beanpole family
refers to the shape of the family tree, tall and thin, meaning families with a small number of children.
DIFFERENT TYPES OF FAMILY
define a blended family
formed from other relationships - eg step families
DIFFERENT TYPES OF FAMILY
define kinship
a unit of people linked together by blood, marriage, adoption, or other ties
DIFFERENT TYPES OF FAMILY
define matrifocal
where the mother is the head of the hosuehold and makes all the decisions
DIFFERENT TYPES OF FAMILY
define empty nest
refers to a household where there is a couple who had children, but they have now left the home.
DIFFERENT TYPES OF FAMILY
define empty shell
refers to a husband and wife who live together and remain legally married, but who experience no intimate or emotional relationship. eg remaining together for the kids
define conflict theory Vs. consensus theory
conflict theory
the idea that society is based on:
- values and interests of dominant groups
- emphasis on the difference and inequalities in society and looks to the ruling classes to explain these
consensus theory
the idea that society is based on:
- social order and stability come from unifying norms and values
- without these norms and values society crumbles
The consensus theory suggests that social order in society is based on a system of shared norms and values, while conflict theory proposes that social order in society is based on a system of inequality.
how does the family help society?
refer to a theorist and a functionalist, marxist, and feminist perspective
functionalists - see the family as the foundation of society
feminists- see family as serving the needs for men and oppressing women
marxists - argue that it meets the needs of capitalism, not those of family members or society as a whole.
THEORIST
george peter murdock - 1949
argued that the family performed 4 essential functions to meet the needs of coiety and its members
1. stable satisfaction of the sex drive
2. reproduction of the next generation
3. socialisation of the young
4. meeting its members and economics needs
what does parson believe about the family
argues that there are only 2 key functions of the family:
1. primary socialisation of kids
2. stabilisation of adult personalities
he believes that as society evolves the family loses some of it functions, due to structural differentiation -meaning institutions such as school has taken their place.
what is warm bath theory
the family provides an environment in which the stress of everyday working life is relieved. women are the foundation of the family and in service, children are centred.
men are able to use the family to relieve stress using unpaid labour of women.
what is the new right perspective
see the family as a cornerstone of society and the normal family as a nuclear family.
They believe in minimal government intervention and oppose social and welfare policies. This is because they undermine personal responsibility and creates a dependency culture.
what are the four functions of the family according to Murdock
- stable satisfaction of the sex drive
- reproduction - of the next generation
- socialisation - of young people into societies shared norms and values
- economics - meeting its members economic needs like food and shelters
what is structural differentiation
when institutions take over the role of the family (school). this means that parents have less control.
MARXIST KEY TERM
what is the bourgeoisie
the ruling elite class.
they own the means of production. eg. machinery, factories, etc. they profit from the work of the proletariat and run society in a way that maintains their rule
MARXIST KEY TERM
what is a base (subculture)
the means of production, eg. tools, machinery, factories.
MARXIST KEY TERM
what is a proletariat
the worker/working classes who are exploited by the bourgeoisie for their labour
MARXIST KEY TERM
what is a superstructure
the social institutions that make up society. eg. media, schools/education, religions.
MARXIST KEY TERM
what is capitalism
a social and economic system in which exists in all countries, it is based on private ownership of services and goods. people create and sell their products and services and each individual is responsible for their own economic success. capitalists own the means of production and benefit of the labour of their workers. the government plays a secondary role in capitalism as society is run by private ownership.
MARXISM
what is the marxist perspective on family
marxists believe that the family (particularly the nuclear family) is a tool of capitalism and its main function is to maintain capitalism and reinforce social inequalities.
it is a superstructure and is part of the way the bourgeoisie maintain the social order. it is a social institution that reinforces capitalist ideas overall.
MARXISM
what are strengths and weaknesses to the marxists perspective on the family
strengths:
- marxists explain the ideological role of families in society and suggest reasons people feel strongly about family structures
- offers an explanation of why families first developed in society
- points out unpleasant aspects of family life and the inequalities of power within the family
- feminist perspectives have based their analysis on marxist views
weaknesses:
- ignores the meanings families have for individuals
- presents people with an oversocialised view of humans, seeing socialisation as a one way process where children are embedded with capitalist culture
- its over focuses on the negative aspects of the family while ignoring the satisfaction it gives people
- ignores recent economic and educational changes which seem to have resulted in a radical change in how women think of their careers
What is Marxism?
Marxism is a structural conflict perspective. They see society as structured along class lines with institutions generally working in the interests of the small elite class who have economic power (The Bourgeoisie) and the much larger working class (the proletariat). The Bourgeoisie gain their wealth from exploiting the proletariat There is thus a conflict of interests between the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat.
What is feudalism
The dominant social system in medieval
Europe where society was based on the feudal pyramid, with king on top.
In the feudal system the nobility held lands from the crown, while peasants were obliged to live in their lords land.
what do Marxists believe about social conflict (his central view)
for marx, the centre of his view of society is the idea that there is a struggle between segments of society over valued resources. in particular, the battle between social classes over material goods.
how does the family reinforce the capitalist ideology - use theorists to support your answer
- Engel’s view = due to inheritance of private property and ownership
- Zaretsky’s view = due to women still doing the majority of housework and because children are socialised to accept and embody norms and values that uphold capitalism.
- Althusser’s view = the family socialises children into the norms and values that are useful to the capitalist ruling class eg. obedience
the purpose of the family in marxism
the family helps to supply workers to capitalists in what ways?
- more workers - raising children in a safe environment
- free maintenance of work force - domestic labour
- teach children to accept capitalism through socialisation
- pressures family to keep up - the family feel they have to keep up a certain lifestyle for the capitalist agenda
- the family is a cushion - Zaretsky believed the family allows the adults to feel stabilised and ignore the alienation of their working life, making them not rebel.
what is feminism perspective
feminsts perspective highlights the social issues that are often overlooked or misidentified. it analyses women’s experiences of gender subordination and identifies the underlying cause of gender opression.
diverse feminst theories
what do liberal feminists believe
they believe that women’s unequal access to social, political, and economic institutions cause their oppression
diverse feminst theories
what do radical feminists believe
they believe that oppression is rooted in sexuality. women’s bodies are controlled by violence, objectification, and social institutions.
Who suggested that the family is a ‘economy in miniature’? What does this mean?
Delphy and Leonard suggest that the family is a ‘economy in miniature’ This means that the family is run by the woman’s unpaid work. It is central to maintaining the patriarchal control of society. Like Marxists they believe that the elite of society profit off the work of the oppressed but for feminists the women are the oppressed and the men are the elite.
What is dual burden
Women still have to take most responsibility for the domestic work even in full time employment
What is the triple shift
Women take on the paid, emotional and domestic work in the home
Outline and explain 2 ways that Marxists explain how the family contributes to social inequalities
- socialises children into dominant capitalist ideology ⬇️
Socialised through:
•• Superstructures - sending children to school to learn the capitalist ideology
•• Unit of consumption - feel pressured to consume and buy things to keep up. Children have power to encourage/force parents to buying and living a certain lifestyle. - cushioning and effect - family alleviates the alienation of work and quells rebellion. Zaretsky believed the family allows adults to feel stabilised and ignore the alienation of their working life.
(Example answer in book one)
Summarise radical feminism
- all society = patriarchy
- gender inequality = key problem
- men = enemy/source of exploitation
- family/marriage = maintain inequality and patriarchal societies which maintains stereotypes and therefore the nuclear family
Summarise Marxist feminism
- capitalism = cause of gender inequality
↪️ system exploit women’s labour
↪️ patriarchy = causes capitalism - eliminate economic barrier = reach equality
Summarise liberal feminism
- concerned on ending gender discrimination
- egalitarian (balance of men and women) no enemy’s
- critique to their view for not fighting to end unpaid labour
The personal life perspective argues that all families suffer from what 2 weaknesses
- They tend to assume the traditional nuclear family is the dominant family type. Ignoring diversity in families today
- They are all structural theories. They assume the hay families and their members are simply passive puppets manipulated by the structure of society to perform certain functions
How does the family perform an ideological function according to Marxists
It socialises children into the idea that hierarchy and inequality are inevitable and offer an illusory ‘haven’ from the harsh and explorative world of capitalism outside
Explain the difference between Marxist feminism and radical feminism
Marxist feminists see capitalism as the main cause of women’s oppression whereas radical feminists see men as the main cause
What is meant by a ‘bottom up’ approach to the family
An approach focusing on the meanings that individual family members hold and how these shape their actions and relationships
Give 2 examples of relationships some people regard as ‘family’ but aren’t based on blood or marriage
- pets
- relationships with friends
Define family diversity
The difference between families including: roles, organisation, and structures
‘Is family beneficial to society?’
Give reasons for why someone would say yes to this statement
Don’t have to know ALL:
- creates better variety of support systems, eg. Same sex couples
- provides a greater social world to experience
- women no longer oppressed badly by patriarchal relationships = post modernism
- flexibility in relationships - Giddens, confluent love
- no gender roles
- feminists = no evidence it doesn’t socialise kids as good
Is family beneficial to society?
Give reasons for why someone would say no to this statement
Don’t have to know ALL:
- can be less cohesive and hard to form shared norms and values - functionalist
- can go against religious or cultural views and norms
- ‘zombie families’ cannot provide (Beck)
- doesn’t support necessary socialisation AS well - functionalist, parsons
- leads to society breaking down, kids less socialised - new right
Define modernist
Where modern society is fairly fixed in its structure. Nuclear families are best suited to the capitalist working structure
FAMILY DIVERSITY
What is the functionalist/Parsons perspective on diversity?
(Is it good or bad?)
DIVERSITY = BAD
- modernist perspective - nuclear families are better suited.
- they see the split functions of the family into father and mother/husband and wife as beneficial (nuclear family is good)
- other family types are dysfunctional as they are less able to support the necessary socialisation of children
FAMILY DIVERSITY
What is the New right perspective on diversity?
(Is it good or bad?)
DIVERSITY = BAD
- patriarchal nuclear family is the only natural family type. Biological distinctions between men and women mean they are suited to the role of breadwinner and career.
- marriage is necessary and more stable and shows a deliberate and permanent commitment.
- Cohabiting is a negative trend as it’s more likely to end marriage.
⬆️ Harry Benson - cohabiting is more likely to break down in the first three years than a marriage. Cohabiting = 20% ended, marriage = 6% ended - social policy has increased diversity by supporting non - nuclear family types eg. Single mother benefit. This leads to society breaking down as children are more vulnerable in non-nuclear families. They are not socialised into societal norms and expectations
FAMILY DIVERSITY
What is the functionalist/Chester’s perspective on diversity?
(Is it good or bad?)
DIVERSITY = OVER-EXAGGERATED
Chester: neo-conventional family:
neo-conventional families (nuclear families but not as patriarchal).
- movement away from gender roles, more equal partnership in domestic labour and wage earning. The family is still nuclear but the organisation is different.
- majority of families are still nuclear and most non nuclear family types either were or will become nuclear.
- most cohabiting families are temporary before getting married
FAMILY DIVERSITY
What is the rapoports perspective on diversity?
(Is it good or bad?)
Include the 5 types they found
DIVERSITY = GREAT
Study in 1980’s found family becoming more diverse. Looked at the changes to social policy and found this allowed for more diversity in the family.
Identified 5 types of family diversity:
- organisational:
Differences in the way family organises its obligations. eg. More diversity in gender roles and expectations - cultural:
Social differences in families from different ethnicities - social class:
MC and WC had different ways of organising the family - life course:
Stage of life we are at means the family is structured and organised in different ways. Eg. Young 20 yr old couple and mid 40’s family - cohort:
The different generations had different expectations and roles in the family
FAMILY DIVERSITY
What is the post modernist perspective on diversity?
(Is it good or bad?)
DIVERSITY = GREAT
- society is now more fractured and divided. People now exist as a collection of subcultures
- people can create their identities from a variety of cultures and sexualities and social movements
- the rapid rise of tech has dissolved the previous geographical and generational barriers making life less predictable
- David Cheadle argues this decreases stability and increases freedom. Therefore we can no longer generalise about family life as it is too fractured and diverse
FAMILY DIVERSITY
What is Stacey’s postmodern feminist perspective on diversity?
(Is it good or bad?)
DIVERSITY = GREAT
The increased freedom has allowed women to no longer be oppressed by patriarchal relationships. Through life history interviews Stacey found that postmodern family’s women have been the agents of change rather than men. Women are creating families on their own terms
FAMILY DIVERSITY
What is Beck’s negotiated couple perspective on diversity?
(Is it good or bad?)
DIVERSITY = GREAT
We live in a risk society because we have more freedom to make choice so we are more aware if the risks to be able to calculate the risk reward ratio.
People can now negotiate their roles in the relationships, they are not confined by the patriarchal gender roles if traditional nuclear families. This means people can calculate what roles best suit their partnership.
However there are zombie families where they appear to function but cannot provide. They don’t end due to the need for comfort and structure in the postmodern world.
what is Giddens - confluent love, perspective
- Relationships have moved from need to want. there is greater choice in what we can do so we have greater equality and flexibility in relationships.
- this leads to a personal choice of family for personal satisfaction. marriages are less secure and only held by the will of people in them. these are referred to as pure relationships. they are less stable, leading to greater family diversity
what is the personal life perspective
- agree with individualisation thesis from Beck and Giddens that there is greater family diversity but disagree that people have complete freedom of choice.
this is because we are still limited by traditional norms.
what is the connectedness thesis (smart)
That we have choices but these are always made within a web of connectedness; all choices are linked and influenced by our networks of existing relationships and interwoven personal histories.
what does may argue about changing power structures
may argues power structures are changing not disappearing. women have more rights but there are still barriers to accessing freedom in society
define social policy
ideas/policies made by political parties and government designed to affect/improve quality of life
the 1969 and 1984 divorce acts
how could this policy affect family life in the UK?
more women have more power = more file for divorces, this leads to more lone parents and re-marriages
the 1969 and 1984 divorce acts
does it support or undermine the traditional nuclear family?
undermine.
it shows women are not property (but in long term (chester) they will become nuclear families again
the 1969 and 1984 divorce acts
who does this policy benefit?
women.
as it is shown they are not mens property and have power
maternity and paternity acts
how could this policy affect family life in the UK?
raise in the number of children. enforces a certain role of women in the family, as they have longer paid leave. benefits child centred society
maternity and paternity acts
does it support or undermine the traditional nuclear family?
both.
support = because more women have kids, encourages traditional roles
undermine = can encourage single mothers due to paid leave
maternity and paternity acts
who does this policy benefit?
women - can now be a lone parent; have a child and get paid still
civil partnerships and gay marriage 2014
how could this policy affect family life in the UK?
- more marriages and therefore diversity in families
- decreases the social expectations of men unable to foster care
- rise in adoption
civil partnerships and gay marriage 2014
does it support or undermine the traditional nuclear family?
undermine.
goes against what ‘traditional’ nuclear family looks like
civil partnerships and gay marriage 2014
who does this policy benefit?
same sex couples
universal child benefits
how could this policy affect family life in the UK?
- rise in children, knowing its supported and you will gain money.
- poor families can afford to have children
- provides basic standard of living
universal child benefits
does it support or undermine the traditional nuclear family?
support.
allows support for nuclear family as it encourages them to have kids
universal child benefits
who does this policy benefit?
poorer families
income support for single parents
how could this policy affect family life in the UK?
more confidence to get a divorce, knowing there is support = more lone parents
income support for single parents
does it support or undermine the traditional nuclear family?
undermine = more lone parents
income support for single parents
who does this policy benefit?
lone parents
what is the marxist (donzelot) perspective on social policy
negative view.
- donzelot sees policy as a form of state power/control and survelliance over families
- argues doctors and social workers use their knowledge to control and change families
- argue social pocies operate in the interests of the capitalist class and reverse progress made.
what is the radical feminsts perspective on social policy
negative view.
- argut it has reinforced the patriarchy
- only benefits men, not usually women
what is the new right perspective on social policy
- some polcies have damaged marriage and the nuclear family by promoting deviant family types/lifestyles
- state should still play a MINIMAL role in peoples lives
- family is naturally self-reliant
what is the functionalist perspective on social policy
- state serves the interests of society as a whole eg. free healthcare
- but they assume all families benefit equally and there is a progress
what is the social democratic approaches perspective on social policy
positive view
- policy supports us all as a whole and keeps us going as a group
- helps develop and support families
what is the liberal feminist perspective on social policy
positive view.
- social policies relating to equal work pay and opportunties has helped women to insist on more equality in the family
define stigma
negative label, social disapproval or shame attached to a person, action, or relationship
define secularization
decline in the influence of religion in society
what is the new right (charles murray) perspective on the rising divorce rate?
It is bad.
Following consequences:
- elimination of nuclear family, they don’t believe other families can survive without it.
- negative influence on kids as they are more likely to be deviant
- rising number of single mothers who depend on and take advantage of the welfare system
Charles Murray:
Believes the above +
Claims that single parents are part of an ‘underclass’ that brings up kids in a dependency culture in which they become deviant
What is the post modernism (Beck and Beck-Gernsheim) perspective on the rising divorce rate
It is good.
- see post modernism as there cause behind changes in relationship trends
- people have more opportunities. Free to enter and exit relationships, creating diversity.
at the same time people get a divorce easier if a ‘more perfect’ partner comes - creating more diversity
Beck and BG call this a clash between love and individual freedom
What is the new right (Rodger’s and Pryor) perspective on the rising divorce rate
It is bad.
- see divorce as being detrimental (harmful) to children and parents should stay together
- Rodger’s and Pryor argue children of divorced parents experience more poverty, poor housing, behavioural problems, teenage pregnancy, and educational underachievement
What is the functionalist perspective on the rising divorce rate
It is good.
The higher expectations people place in marriage today is a major cause of rising divorce rates. However, people’s continuation with marriage demonstrates a continued commitment to marriage within society. Therefore, divorce isn’t that bad as they are likely to get married again
What is the feminist (duncombe and marsden) perspective on rising divorce rates
It is good.
Women won’t have the burden of housework etc.
this frees women from the oppression of marriage.
Give pros and cons to reconstituted families
pros
- kids learn to relate with different people
- kids develop good problem solving skills
- more diversity
- good financial security and family support
cons
- conflict increase within families
- tense relationships affects a kids wellbeing and attitude