Paper 1 struggles Flashcards
Evaluate conformity types and explanations
+research support ISI (Lucas et al)
+research support NSI (Asch)
-two process approach is oversimplified (isn’t always possible to know if they work
-individual differences NSI (nAffiliators)
Evaluate conformity types and explanations
+research support ISI (Lucas et al)
+research support NSI (Asch)
-two process approach is oversimplified (isn’t always possible to know if they work
-individual differences NSI (nAffiliators)
Outline the findings of variables affecting conformity
group size
unanimity
-group size : with 2 confeds it was 13.6 but with 3 it rose to 31.8%
unanimity : dissenter = 25%
what is a sensory register
storage of information that we receive from our senses
describe proximity in milgrams study with variations (3)
proximity variation :
touch proximity variation:
remote instruction:
original: adjoining rooms - teacher could hear learner but not see
proximity variation : same room dropped from 65% to 40%
touch proximity variation: dropped to 30% when teacher had to force learners hand onto a shock plate
remote instruction: experimenter gave telephones instructions obedience dropped to 30% (also gave fake ones
location in milgrams study with variation
run down building 47.5% ( experimenter has less authority)
uniform in milgrams study
grey lab coat
everyday clothes dropped to 20%
uniform acts as a strong visual authority symbol and cue to behave in an obedient manner
evaluate situational variables
+research has control of variables (systematically altered one variable at a time)
+replicated in other cultures (Miranda et al found over 90% obedience in Spanish students
-obedience alibi (‘excuse for obedience’)
-lack internal validity
Outline agentic state as an explanation for obedience (4)
-occurs when we act in behalf of another person
-opposite of agentic state is autonomous
-agentic shift occurs when a person refers to the authority figure
-binding factors reduce the ‘moral strain of obeying immoral orders.
Outline legitimacy of authority as an explanation for obedience
-we obey people at the top of a social hierarchy
-authorities have legitimacy through society’s agreements
-we hand control of our behaviour over to authority figures due to trust and through upbringing
-charismatic leaders use their legitimate powers for destructive purposes
Evaluate social psychological factors 2.2 (agentic state/loa)
+agentic state explanation has research support ( Blass and Schmidt)
+legitimacy of authority can be used to explain real life obedience (my lai massacre)
-agentic state cannot account for the behaviour of nazis (Mandel 1998 german reserve police battalion
- agentic shift doesn’t explain many of the research findings
describe the authoritarian personality
- a high level of obedience is pathological
-ap includes extreme respect for authority and contempt for ‘inferiors’
-originated in childhood ( eg overly strict parenting)
-hostility towards/ fear of parent sis displaced onto those who are socially inferior
outline the procedure in adornos study
-investigated unconscious attitudes towards other racial groups of more than 2000 middle class white usas
several scales were developed eg
obedience and respect for authority are the most important virtue for children to learn
there is hardly anything lower than a person who does not feel great love gratitude and respect for his parents
outline the conclusions of adornos study
-authoritarians (ppl who scored. high ) = identified with strong and hate for weak
conscious of their own and others status showing excessive respect to those of higher status
cognitive of fixed distinctive stereotypes and no fuzziness between categories
evaluate dispositional explanations (ap)
+support for the link between ap and obedience
-limited (germany
-f scale is politically bias ( christie and jahoda suggest f scale aims to measure tendency towards extreme right wing ideology)
describe social support as resistance to si inc milgram study
-conformity is reduced by a dissenting peer
-effect is not long lasting
-obedience is reduced by one other dissenting partner ( frees the ppt to act from their own conscious milgrams research : independent behaviour increased in the disobedient peer condition ( from 35% to 90%)
what is continuum in locus of control
a construct that is said to be part of our personality. It is a continuum which runs from a strong external locus of control at one end of the continuum to a strong internal locus of control at the other end
evaluate resistance to social influence (loc)
+ research evidence (Asch)
+ research evidence ( Holland repeated milgrams study 37% internals did not continue 23% of externals did)
-role of LOC in resistance may be exaggerated
-not all research supports link between Loc and resistance (more people have become more independent but also more external