Paper 1 Social Influences Flashcards
What is the definition of Conformity?
A change in a persons behaviour or opinions because of real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people. It involves “yielding” to group pressure and is also known as majority influence.
What is the definition of Internalisation?
A deep type of conformity where an individual takes on the majority view because they accept it as correct. It leads to a far-reaching and permanent change in behaviour, even when the group is absent.
What is the definition of Identification?
A moderate type of conformity where an individual acts in the same way as the group because they value it and want to be part of it, but they do not necessarily agree with everything the majority believes.
What is the definition of Compliance?
A superficial and temporary type of conformity where an individual outwardly goes along with the majority view, but privately. disagrees with it. The change in behaviour only lasts as long as the group is monitoring them.
When does conformity occur?
It occurs when an individuals behaviour and their beliefs are influenced by a larger group of people.
Who suggested the three ways in which people conform to the opinion of a majority? ad what were they?
Kelman (1958). they were compliance, identification and internalisation
When does Compliance occur?
Compliance occurs when individuals adjust their behaviour and opinions to a group because of a desire to fit in and be accepted/ avoid disapproval.meaning it only involves public change in belief. this causes the changes to be weak and temporary and beliefs revert when group is not present.
When does Identification occur?
this occurs when individuals adjust their behaviour + opinions to those of the group, because membership of that group is desirable. they identify with the group and “take on” their beliefs and behaviours. this is a stronger type of conformity as it involves public and private change in opinion. However, opinions revert after they leave the group.
When does Internalisation occur?
this occurs when individuals genuinely adjust behaviour and options. both publicly and privately. this is known as true conformity, s this change is permanent and it is built into ones belief system. this would not change even if the person has left the group.
What is an example of compliance?
An individual may say they like a certain singer such as Taylor swift that everyone else in their group likes. This is so that they would not be ridiculed but instead accepted by the group. But privately they do not like Taylor.
What is am example of identification?
In the army an individual may adopt certain behaviours and beliefs associated with war and their fellow soldiers. However after leaving the army and returning to civilian life, new behaviours and opinions will be adopted.
What is an example of internalisation?
An individual may be exposed to lots of vegan campaigns and so they adopt the belief that “eating meat is wrong” and become vegan themselves.
What was Asch’s Research design?
- lab experiment as the independent variable was manipulated in a controlled environment that was unnatural for the participants.
- the IV was a type of trial.
- A volunteer sampling method was used as participants responded to a newspaper advert.
- DV was the level of conformity (whether participants gave the incorrect answer).
What are the two types of trials?
- control trial (confederates gave the correct answer)
- critical trial ( confederates gave the incorrect answer)
What was the Aim of Asch’s study?
-to investigate the degree to which individuals would conform to a majority who gave obviously wrong answers using a ‘visual perception’ task.
What was Asch’s procedure?
-123 american male students were tested.(each one in a group with other apparent participants)
-Each participant saw two large white cards on each trial. The line one the left hand card was the standard line. The lines A,B and C were the three comparisons lines. One of the comparison lines was always clearly the same length as the standard line. the other two were substantially different (clearly wrong).
- participants had to say which comparison lines were the same length as the standard line out loud every time.
- tested in groups of 6 to 8.
- only 1 genuine participant seated on the last/second last chair.
-others were confederates and gave the same incorrect answers.
- real participants didn’t know about the ‘fake’ participants.
- they all completed 18 trails and the confederates gave the same incorrect answer on 12 trails. (critical trials).
What were Asch’s findings?
- the real participants conformed to the incorrect answers on 36.8% of there critical trials.
- 75% of the articiants conformed at least once on the critical trials.
- 25% never conformed.
- when there were no confederates the participant gave an incorrect answer 1% of the time.
- Asch interviewed each participant after and most said they conformed as they wanted to fit in or because they thought they would be ridiculed (distortion of action).
- others conformed because they had doubts about their own answer (distortion of judgement).
What was Asch’s conclusions?
- the judgements of individuals are impacted by majority opinions, even when the majority are obviously wrong.
- the participants conformed due to formative social influence and the desire to fit in and avoid rejection.
Ethical reasons for Asch’s evaluation?
-participants were deceived as they believed that the confederates where also participants. However, the participants needed to be deceived to test their conformity to an obvious answer.
- Participants were put through psychological harm as they were put under stress of having to decide whether to conform or not. Most had increased levels of autonomic arousal.
Validity reasons for Asch’s evaluation?
-findings may have suffered from demand characteristics. Due to the easy nature of the task many participants could’ve guessed the aim of the study and changed their behaviour. they could’ve conformed as they thought it was required of them and not because they felt the real need to conform which could skew the validity of the results.