Paper 1 - Attachment Flashcards

1
Q

What are the three behaviours that indicate an attachment has formed?

A

Proximity, Separation Distress, Secure Base Behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define reciprocity in caregiver-infant interactions.

A

Refers to a turn-taking pattern where an infant and caregiver respond to each other’s behaviours, much like a conversation.
For example, a baby crying may elicit a soothing response from the caregiver, which in turn calms the infant.
This process helps form emotional bonds and attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define interactional synchrony

A

Temporal coordination of behaviours between an infant and their caregiver, involves a high degree of similarity and timing between caregiver and infants. Important in creating an emotional attachment between an infant and a caregiver, improving social and emotional skills.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Meltzoff & Moore (1977) investigate?

A

Imitation in infants. Videotaped babies 12–21 days old watching an adult make facial expressions or hand movements. Found infants imitated from as young as 2 weeks old.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Tronick et al (1978) find in the Still Face Experiment?

A

When caregivers stopped responding, babies became distressed, showing the importance of reciprocity in attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Isabella et al (1991) find about interactional synchrony?

A

Securely attached infants had more synchrony with their mothers, while insecurely attached infants were less synchronised.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a strength of research into caregiver infant interactions regarding internal validity.

A

High internal validity—detailed recordings allow for accurate observations, and infants don’t show demand characteristics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a strength of research into caregiver infant interactions regarding real life application?

A

Practical applications—encourages parents to engage in social interactions, improving child development (e.g., language & empathy).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a weakness of research into caregiver interactions regarding drawing conclusions?

A

We can’t be sure if infants’ behaviours are intentional or just reflexive (e.g., Meltzoff & Moore’s study on facial expressions).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a weakness of research into caregiver interactions regarding social sensitivity?

A

Suggests mothers who return to work early may harm attachment, putting pressure on them to stay home.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the aim of Schaffer & Emerson’s study?

A

To investigate the development of attachment in infants over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the method used by Schaffer & Emerson?

A

Longitudinal study of 60 infants from working-class families in Glasgow

Recorded attachment behaviours between 6 weeks – 18 months

Visited families every 4 weeks until 1 year, then again at 18 months

Used self-report (caregiver questions) & observations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How did Schaffer & Emerson (1964) measure attachment?

A

Measured Separation Anxiety & Stranger Distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the findings of Schaffer & Emerson’s study?

A

At 25-32 weeks, 50% of babies showed separation anxiety towards their most interactive caregiver.

By 40 weeks, 80% had a specific attachment, and 30% had multiple attachments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is one strength of Schaffer & Emerson’s research regarding ecological validity?

A

Conducted in natural home environments

More realistic behaviour observed

Findings are more generalizable to everyday life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is one limitation of Schaffer & Emerson’s research regarding self-report data?

A

Social desirability bias—parents may exaggerate their role in attachment, reducing validity

Diaries may be inconsistent due to busy schedules of working class mothers

However, Schaffer and Emerson were fully aware of this and took steps to reduce the impact of SDB. Such as building a strong rapport with the family, having a non-judgemental approach and triangulating self-report with their own observations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Why might the findings of Schaffer & Emerson’s research lack cultural validity?

A

Only studied working-class, Scottish, individualist families

In collectivist cultures, multiple attachments may form earlier

Limits external validity of attachment stages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are the stages of attachment?

A

Asocial Stage 0-6 weeks

Indiscriminate 6 weeks – 7 months

Discriminate 7-9 Months

Multiple 10-18 Months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What happens in the Asocial Stage (0-6 weeks)?

A

Babies respond to anyone, even inanimate objects

No clear preference for specific caregivers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What happens in the Indiscriminate Stage (6 weeks – 7 months)?

A

Preference for human company but no preference for a specific caregiver

Can be comforted by strangers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What happens in the Discriminate Stage (7-9 months)?

A

Strong attachment to one primary caregiver

Separation anxiety when apart from PC

Stranger distress when approached by strangers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What happens in the Multiple Attachments Stage (10-18 months)?

A

Attachments with multiple people

Less dependent on PC but still seek comfort/support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

RofF - What did Schaffer & Emerson (1964) find about fathers and attachment?

A

By 18 months, 75% of infants had formed an attachment with their father

Only 3% had the father as their primary attachment figure

Fathers typically became attached in the Multiple Attachment Stage (10-18 months)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How do societal norms affect the role of the father in attachment?

A

Traditional stereotypes portray sensitivity & caregiving as feminine

Lack of paternity leave historically reinforced the norm that mothers should provide primary care

Social expectations may discourage fathers from forming strong attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
How do biological differences affect the role of the father?
Oestrogen in women enhances emotional & caregiving behaviour Oxytocin (bonding hormone) is higher in mothers (esp. during birth & breastfeeding) These differences suggest fathers may be less naturally sensitive caregivers
26
What did Field (1978) find about fathers as primary caregivers? (counterpoint)
Observed 4-month-old babies interacting with caregivers: 30 - PC mothers 30 - PC fathers 30 - SC fathers PC fathers spent more time smiling, interacting, & holding their babies than SC fathers Fathers can adopt reciprocity & interactional synchrony when in the PC role
27
Who came up with the "playmate hypothesis"?
Geiger, 1996
28
What did Geiger (1996) find about the father’s role in attachment?
Fathers are more of a playmate than a caregiver Father-child play is more exciting & stimulating compared to mothers’ more nurturing role Quality of father’s play is linked to child’s attachment in adolescence
29
Why might research on the father’s role be gender or culturally biased?
Focuses on Western, nuclear family structures In collectivist cultures, fathers may be more involved in caregiving Assumes gender roles in attachment, ignoring variations in modern parenting
30
Why is the biological explanation of fathers' roles reductionist?
Hormonal differences (e.g., oxytocin & oestrogen) suggest men are less suited to caregiving BUT: Field (1978) shows fathers can adopt sensitive caregiving behaviours Ignores social & cultural influences on father-child attachment
31
What did Lorenz (1935) find about imprinting in geese?
Imprinting: Instinctive attachment to the first moving object seen Two groups: Control group hatched with mother → followed her Experimental group hatched in an incubator → imprinted on Lorenz Irreversible behaviour – geese followed him even when mixed with other geese Critical period: 12-18 hours to imprint, must imprint by 30 hours
32
Strength – How does Lorenz’s study support attachment theory?
Supports Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory (attachment as an adaptive, innate behaviour) Supports the idea of a critical period in attachment formation
33
Weakness – Can we generalise Lorenz’s findings to humans?
Humans are more emotionally complex than geese Evidence from Romanian orphans suggests humans have a sensitive period, not a strict critical period
34
What did Harlow (1958) find about attachment in monkeys?
Baby monkeys raised with two surrogate mothers: Cloth mother (warm, soft, no food) Wire mother (cold, hard, provided food) Monkeys spent 17 hours a day with cloth mother, <1 hour with wire mother When frightened, ran to cloth mother for comfort Suggested attachment is based on comfort & security, not food
35
What were the long-term effects of Harlow’s study on the monkeys?
Social deficits – monkeys were aggressive & struggled with social interaction “Motherless mothers” – female monkeys neglected/abused their offspring Critical period of 90 days – attachment must form, or effects are irreversible
36
Strength – How did Harlow’s study influence attachment research?
Challenged behaviourist ideas (food as basis of attachment) Supports Bowlby’s theory – secure attachment provides a base for exploration
37
Strength - How does Harlow's study have practical application
Social workers now recognise the importance of early bonding and early intervention, recognise signs of neglect and form attachment within 90 days before long term effects are irreversible
38
Weakness – What ethical concerns are there with Harlow’s study?
Severe psychological harm – monkeys became socially dysfunctional Long-term suffering – isolated monkeys showed permanent effects Harlow admitted cruelty – “12 months of isolation almost obliterated the animals socially”
39
How do Lorenz and Harlow’s findings support attachment theories?
Both studies support Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory Lorenz: Attachment is innate Harlow: Contact comfort > food Both show a critical period Lorenz: 12-30 hours (geese) Harlow: 90 days (monkeys)
40
How does classical conditioning explain attachment?
Food (UCS) → Pleasure (UCR) Mother (NS) + Food (UCS) → Pleasure (UCR) Mother (CS) → Pleasure (CR) → Attachment forms
41
How does operant conditioning explain attachment?
Baby: Positive reinforcement (food) Negative reinforcement (removal of hunger) Mother Positive reinforcement (baby’s happiness) Negative reinforcement (stopping crying)
42
What evidence challenges the learning theory of attachment?
Schaffer & Emerson: Babies attach to responsive caregivers, not just the ones who feed them Harlow: Monkeys preferred contact comfort over food Reductionist: Ignores interactional synchrony & responsiveness (Isabella & Belsky)
43
What is a strength of the learning theory of attachment?
Based on an established theory - this is because behaviourism is very well researched and very scientific, applying this to attachment behaviour is seen as a plausible explanation as it provides a clear and straightforward explanation of how attachments are formed through its emphasis on the role of environmental factors on behaviour
44
What are the 5 key features of Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory? (ASCMI)
Adaptive (innate for survival) Social releasers (cute behaviours that trigger caregiving) Critical period (0-2.5 years) Monotropy (one special bond) Internal Working Model (template for future relationships)
45
What supporting evidence is there for Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory?
Lorenz: Imprinting is innate (supports evolution) Harlow: Poor caregiving from motherless mothers (supports Internal Working Model) Tronick et al - Babies showed distress when social releasers were ignored
46
What criticisms exist for Bowlby’s theory?
Schaffer & Emerson: Multiple attachments form (contradicts monotropy) Cultural bias: Some cultures rely on multiple caregivers from birth Social sensitivity: Blames absent parents for later issues in life
47
What type of experiment was Ainsworth's Strange Situation?
A controlled, structured observation designed to assess the quality of attachment between an infant and their caregiver.
48
What were some of the behavioural categories in Ainsworth's Strange Situation?
Proximity Seeking – How closely the infant stays with the mother. Exploration & Secure Base – How much the infant explores the room. Stranger Anxiety – Infant's reaction when a stranger enters. Separation Anxiety – Infant's reaction when the mother leaves. Response to Reunion – Infant's reaction when the mother returns.
49
What were the findings (attachment types) from Ainsworth's Strange Situation?
Secure (70%) – Moderate separation & stranger anxiety, uses mother as a secure base, easily comforted. Insecure Avoidant (15%) – Explores freely, low stranger/separation anxiety, ignores mother on reunion. Insecure Resistant (15%) – Clingy, high stranger/separation anxiety, resists comfort on reunion.
50
What are 2 (methodological) strengths of Ainsworth's strange situation?
Controlled & Standardised – 8 episodes of 3 minutes each, same behavioural categories, allows replication - aligned with principles of science. High Reliability – Bick et al. (2012) found 0.94 inter-observer reliability, little observer bias, but observing infants is always difficult as we can never be sure if behaviours are deliberate or not.
51
What is a limitation of Ainsworth's Strange Situation regarding external validity?
Low Ecological Validity – Artificial setting may not reflect real-life attachment behaviours
52
What is a limitation of Ainsworth's Strange Situation regarding cultural bias?
Cultural issues – 100 American infants were tested and therefore lacks cultural relevance. As a result, the strange situation can be argued to be limited to a part of a specific part of a westernised culture and not be as effective in other cultures.
53
What are some statistics about Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg's research?
Meta Analysis 32 studies, 8 countries, ~2000 infants, all using Strange Situation.
54
What were the intercultural differences found in attachment types?
Germany – Highest Insecure Avoidant (independence encouraged). Japan – Lowest Insecure Avoidant (constant proximity to caregivers). Israel – Highest Insecure Resistant (kibbutzim = little stranger exposure). UK – Lowest Insecure Resistant.
55
What were the intracultural differences found in attachment types?
1.5x greater variation within cultures than between them Secure attachment may be innate, but cultural practices shape attachment types.
56
What are 2 strengths of Cultural Studies into attachment?
Large Sample Size (2000 infants) – Increases validity. Standardised Methodology – Strange Situation used in all studies, allowing direct comparisons.
57
What are 3 Limitations of Cultural Studies
Unrepresentative Samples – Only 2 Japanese studies, attachment patterns differ in rural vs. urban areas (Izendoorn et al., 2001) Temporal Validity Issues – Globalisation may have changed attachment patterns over time. Cultural Bias in Attachment Theories – Independence (valued in Germany) is seen as avoidant, which may not be a negative trait in that culture.
58
What is Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis?
The idea that prolonged separation from the primary caregiver during the critical period (first 2 years) can cause irreversible damage to emotional and cognitive development.
59
What are the 4 consequences of maternal deprivation?
Affectionless psychopathy – Inability to feel guilt or empathy, leading to antisocial behavior. Delinquency – Higher likelihood of criminal behavior. Lower cognitive abilities – Reduced IQ and academic difficulties. Problems forming relationships – Difficulty in future attachments.
60
What was the aim of Bowlby’s 44 Juvenile Thieves study?
To investigate the link between maternal deprivation and delinquency.
61
What was the procedure of the 44 Juvenile Thieves study?
88 children from Bowlby’s clinic (opportunity sample). 44 thieves vs 44 emotionally disturbed non-thieves (control group). Matched for age and IQ to reduce extraneous variables. Background reports analyzed.
62
What were the key findings of the 44 Juvenile Thieves study?
14 out of 44 thieves were categorized as affectionless psychopaths. 12 of these 14 experienced prolonged maternal separation in early years. Only 2 out of 44 in the control group had experienced similar separations.
63
What is the law of accumulated separation?
The more separations a child experiences, the worse the long-term effects.
64
What is irreversibility in Bowlby’s theory?
The claim that the consequences of early maternal deprivation cannot be undone—“Complete recovery is impossible.”
65
What is a strength of Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis?
Practical applications – Led to maternity leave policies (e.g., 52 weeks in the UK, later paternity leave) and the WHO recognizing the importance of maternal care.
66
What is a limitation of the 44 Juvenile Thieves study?
No third control group of non-referred children – Makes it difficult to isolate maternal deprivation as the cause of affectionless psychopathy - Bowlby himself acknowledged this.
67
How does researcher bias limit Bowlby’s study?
He knew what he was looking for, increasing the risk of confirmation bias. Mothers also provided retrospective self-report data, which may be inaccurate.
68
What led to the high number of Romanian orphans in institutions?
Communist leader Nicolae Ceaușescu banned contraception and taxed childless couples, leading to overpopulation and child neglect.
69
What was the aim of Rutter’s English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) study?
To investigate whether the effects of extreme deprivation could be reversed with a high-quality upbringing.
70
What were the findings of the ERA study?
Children adopted before 6 months showed near-complete recovery by age 4. Children adopted after 6 months suffered long-term issues such as low IQ and social difficulties.
71
What were the 4 specific consequences for orphans adopted after 6 months?
Quasi-autism – Obsessive interests and difficulty in social situations. Disinhibited attachment – Lack of stranger anxiety, seeking comfort from anyone. Inattention & overactivity – Poor impulse control, hyperactivity. Cognitive impairment – Lower IQ (mean IQ of 77 at age 2).
72
What is a strength of the ERA study?
Practical applications – Led to key worker policies in institutions, ensuring children have stable attachments.
73
How do brain scans support the effects of institutionalization?
Chugani et al. (2001) found Romanian orphans had reduced brain activity in areas linked to impulse control, attention, and social behaviour.
74
What is a limitation of the Romanian orphan studies regarding generalisability?
Extreme sample – The harsh conditions of Romanian orphanages may not reflect the typical effects of institutionalization.
75
Why are the long-term effects of institutionalization unclear?
The study only followed children up to age 15 – later recovery in adulthood is unknown.
76
Why is research into Romanian orphans socially sensitive?
It may create a self-fulfilling prophecy for adopted children, making them believe they are destined to struggle.
77
What is the internal working model in attachment theory?
A cognitive framework from early attachment experiences that shapes future relationships by creating expectations about how others will respond to us.
78
How does Bowlby’s monotropic theory relate to later relationships?
The primary attachment relationship serves as a template for future friendships, romantic relationships, and parenting.
79
How does early attachment influence friendships?
Kerns (1994) Secure attachment → More positive relationships, better cooperation with adults, and better emotional regulation. Insecure attachment → More social anxiety, difficulty maintaining relationships, and fewer social skills.
80
What is a weakness ofresearch into early attachments influence in the formation of later relationships?
Correlation ≠ causation – The studies to support the effect of the IWM in forming future friendly, romantic and parental relationships were purely correlational studies and lack control over extraneous variables which can influence future relationships.
80
What is a strength of Kerns’ research into early attachments influence in the formation of later relationships?
Real-world applications – Schools can use attachment-based interventions to support children struggling with friendships.
81
What was the aim of Hazan & Shaver’s ‘Love Quiz’?
To investigate the link between early attachment types and adult romantic relationships.
82
What was the procedure of the ‘Love Quiz’?
100-item questionnaire in a local newspaper. 620 responses analyzed. Participants self-reported their childhood attachment and current romantic experiences.
83
What were the findings of Hazan & Shaver’s study?
Secure attachment → More likely to have long-lasting, healthy relationships. Avoidant attachment → Feared closeness, believed love doesn’t last. Resistant attachment → Fell in love quickly, became needy.
84
What is a limitation of Hazan & Shaver’s study?
Self-report bias – Participants may have misremembered or exaggerated their relationships due to social desirability bias.
85
If stuck, what are 4 evaluations to put in any attachment essay?
- Attachment is a difficult concept to operationalise, it can be hard to define it varies across time periods and cultures. It can be hard to observe and measure. --- Attachment research is hard to conduct, infants present a particular challenge as they are nonverbal. Researchers have additional responsibilities regarding ethical treatment of children. --- Attachment research is susceptible to bias; researchers may have their own opinions about attachment behaviours based on their own attachment experiences. Participants are likely to exhibit ‘social desirability bias’. + Attachment is a very important issue. Understanding attachment has important benefits for individuals, families and society. Early attachment has effects for later life so important to understand.