Page 5 Flashcards

0
Q

What are the two questions you should always ask when dealing with proximate cause?

A
  1. Was the harm foreseeable?

2. Were there intervening acts?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

If you drive 90 km/h in a 50 km/hour zone and your passenger has a heart attack, are you proximate cause of his death?

A

Unless you should have reasonably foreseen that your culpably negligent driving would cause a heart attack, you shouldn’t be guilty of manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the substantial factor test?

A

If two people inflict mortal wounds on a victim and either is enough to kill him, it must be asked whether the defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in bringing about the result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

If there are multiple assailants that aren’t working together, how does guilt work?

A

Each are as guilty as the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

If you hasten someone’s death, what does that mean for liability?

A

You are the cause of death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

If you prematurely pull the plug on a terminally ill patient, how does that affect your liability?

A

You were the cause of death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

If April goes on a desert trek and you poison her water, but Bo steals the water and April dies of thirst, who is the cause of death?

A

Bo, because he was the actual cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

If there is a small difference between what you meant to happen and what actually happened, are you still the direct cause?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is an intervening cause?

A

When your intended result is achieved in an unintended way because of an intervening act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If there is a coincidence that wasn’t foreseeable as an intervening cause, are you liable?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If there is a response to your actions that is an intervening cause, are you liable?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If there is no evidence that your act caused or accelerated the victim’s death, are you liable?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a superseding intervening act?

A

An intervening act that breaks the chain of causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

If an act is foreseeable, will it be superseding?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If an act is unforeseeable, will it break the chain of causation?

A

Probably

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a dependent intervening act?

A

Intervening act that doesn’t break the chain of causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the four different intervening cause categories?

A

A. Victim
B. Third person
C. Defendant
D. Nonhuman source

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How can a victim be an intervening cause?

A

If the victim in someway contributes to his own death after the defendant’s attack

18
Q

What are the ways a victim can contribute to his own death?

A
  • trying to escape
  • impulsively acting to avoid harm
  • acting voluntarily to refuse treatment
  • committing suicide
19
Q

If the victim contributes to his own death, how does that affect the guilt of the defendant?

A

Usually means the defendant is still guilty

20
Q

How can a third person be an intervening cause?

A
  • negligent treatment by a doctor

- another defendant coming along and also harming the victim

21
Q

If a doctor negligently treats a wound, does that make him the proximate cause of death?

A

Only if the negligence was gross negligence, because ordinary negligence is not abnormal and doesn’t cut off liability

22
Q

If you shoot someone and leave them to die, and another stabs them and hastens the death, that person is guilty of murder. Are you?

A

Yes because at the time of death both wounds were contributing to the life shortening process, or your intent to kill that person made him unable to defend himself against the other, so you proximately caused the death

23
Q

How can the defendant be an intervening cause?

A

If the defendant thought he killed the victim, but didn’t, and actually killed him while trying to dispose of the body

24
Q

How can a nonhuman source be an intervening cause?

A

If the defendant intends to kill someone, but just wounds them and leaves them somewhere that nonhuman sources finish him off

25
Q

What are some examples of nonhuman sources that could be intervening causes?

A
  • being kicked by a horse
  • struck by lightning
  • exposure to the elements
26
Q

How is a D still liable if the victim is killed by a nonhuman source?

A

As long as the nonhuman source is foreseeable, the defendant is liable

27
Q

Do acts of nature usually break the chain of causation?

A

No, but unforeseeable freak acts of nature often do. Ie: earthquakes

28
Q

If you contract a disease during treatment, does that break the chain?

A

Not usually unless the disease is very rare and totally unforeseeable

29
Q

How does the MPC deal with proximate cause?

A

When the defendant’s conduct brings about an unintended result, the question is put to the jury about whether the result is too remote or accidental to have a just bearing on the actor’s liability

30
Q

How does the MPC deal with proximate cause for situations that there’s a difference between the result imagined and the actual result?

A

If the but-for test can be applied, the conduct is the cause of the result

31
Q

What is the status prohibition?

A

Defendant cannot be charged for a state of being, rather than what he has done. Ie: being a vagrant, prostitute, drunk, etc.

32
Q

What are inchoate crimes?

A

Planning crimes that are punished before the harm occurs

33
Q

What is the proper order of inchoate crimes?

A
  • Solicitation
  • Conspiracy
  • Attempt
34
Q

If on an exam there is no evidence about which defendant came up with the idea to commit a crime, how should that be dealt with?

A

Skip solicitation and just discuss conspiracy

35
Q

What is solicitation?

A

Minor crime when someone asks someone else to commit a crime with the specific intent that the crime be committed

36
Q

What are some examples of solicitation?

A

Enticing, advising, inciting, ordering, encouraging

37
Q

On an exam how should you always discuss solicitation?

A

Identify it with the crime committed. Ie: solicitation to commit murder

38
Q

What are the elements of solicitation?

A
  • D urged another person to commit some act

- The act urged would have been a crime if it was committed

39
Q

When is solicitation complete?

A

When the command/request is made

40
Q

Does a solicitation have to be personal?

A

No, it can be to a large group of people

41
Q

Is bare solicitation considered an attempt?

A

No because completion requires action by the person solicited

42
Q

The solicitor is guilty of solicitation until the crime is completed, and then he becomes what?

A

An accessory before the fact to the substantive offense

43
Q

How can attempted solicitation happen?

A

If the solicitor mails an inciting letter that is never received