Page 18 Flashcards
What is the redline rule?
There is no felony murder liability when a non-felon kills a felon, but there is liability when a non-felon kills another non-felon, or a felon kills another felon
What is the majority position for vicarious responsibility of co-felons?
All felons are liable for any homicide that happens during the commission of a felony
If a victim aims at a felon, but misses and kills a bystander, who is liable?
The felons, because a non-felon killed another non-felon
What are the exceptions to vicarious responsibility for a nonviolent co-felon?
- D didn’t commit the homicide or solicit it
- D wasn’t armed with a deadly weapon
- D had no reasonable grounds to believe that any of his co-felons were armed
- D had no reasonable grounds to believe that any of his co-felons intended to engage in conduct likely to result in death/GBI
All parties are guilty for deviations from the common plan in a felony situation that are the what?
Foreseeable consequences of carrying out the plan
Would an accidental shooting during an armed robbery be a foreseeable deviation from the plan?
Totally
All parties are guilty for deviations from the common plan that are the foreseeable consequences of carrying out the plan and also for unforeseeable what?
Deaths, like heart attacks, that happen during the felony
What would be one exception to co-felon vicarious liability?
If a co-felon does something that is so far removed from the plan as not to be foreseeable, and the others had no idea it was going to happen, and it doesn’t further the plan
If a co-felon rapes and kills a woman while waiting for the others to arrive, and that wasn’t part of the plan, are the others responsible for that death?
No, because it was far removed from the plan, wasn’t foreseeable, they had no idea it was going to happen, and it didn’t further the plan
What happens to vicarious liability for co-felons in situations where an independent intervening event occurs?
Unforeseeable acts of third parties that are not privileged by an affirmative defense cut off liability
If you burgle a home, and that person goes crazy and starts shooting down the street, and kills a neighbor, are you responsible?
No, because it was an independent intervening event that was unforeseeable and not justified, so his act was illegal and cut off your liability
If a justification is present for the underlying crime of FM, then what happens?
It transforms the label from murder into no crime
What are the four different justifications that would transform a crime into no crime?
- victim engaged in crime
- self-defense
- defense of others
- reasonable mistake
What are the two reactions that are justified if a victim is engaged in crime?
- crime prevention
* apprehension of a fleeing felon
How are your actions justified if you were trying to prevent someone from committing a dangerous felony?
Only if deadly force is reasonably necessary