overpayments Flashcards
law regarding overpayments
SS (Admin) Act 1992 section 75
HB regs 2006 part 13 99 to 107
HB SPC regs 2006 P12 80 to 88
HB recovery of OP’s regs 1997
duties of the LA in dealing with overpayments
must decide whether an overpayment has occurred
clasify this as recoverable or not recoverable
calculate the amount and the period that it covers
decide the amount to be recovered, who to recover from and how they are going to recover it
notify the persons affected - CL LL payee
claim correct rate of subsidy - by classifying correctly
have a policy on overpayment recovery
classifying an OP
classified so that LA claims correct subsidy so
DWP error LA error LA error (admin delay) CL error CL fraud other OP - no one's fault payment on account - IRL technical and advance payments
underlying entitlement regs
HB regs 2996 SPC 2006 reg 104
U/E is mandatory
commissioners decision CH/4943/2001
gross and net OP - (think this means the OP and then the reduced one after we have put the required info on )
requests for further info must be made and beneficial change rule considered
U/E circular A13/2006
read this
from Apr 2010 COA rules A23
A23/2009 - read this
diminishing capital rule - when?
when OP due to misrepresentation of capital or
error relating to capital (not official error)
Op more than 13 weeks
effect of the diminishing cap rule
reduce the amount of capital used in next 13 week period to take account of the capital which would have been spend on rent
what decisions do LA’s make on OP’s
2 decisions
there has been a recoverable OP
whether to recover it
recoverable OP’s
almost all OP’s are recoverale
tech and payment on ac always recoverable
official errors
and caselaw
only recoverable in some cases - where CL could reasonably have been epected to know that they had been overpaid
Elsie Griffiths v liverpool 1990
factors re recover
the individuals circs
LA discretion
LA’s own position (subsidy)
it is the thing most likely to generate an appeal
who to recover from
< April 2006 -
from CL or person who received - SSAA S75 (3)
> Apr 2006 - recovery allowed from LL/agent was then limited
recovery from LL
where LL received the money and
they got the OPaid benefit and
the OP result of a change that the LL could have been expected to report
OR
LL has colluded with the CL to cause the OP
LL has been so neglegent that he has contributed to the period of the OP - end of tenancy and fraud cases
method
ongoing HB/CTB deduction of arrears of HB/CTB recovery from some DWP bens LL recovery invoice and court actions DEA