Organisational issues Flashcards
Early recognition and review
rapid response team
standardised approach to detection of deteriorating patients
NEWS2
critical care outreach
MDT organisational approach to ensure safe, equitable, quality care for acutely unwell and recovering patients irrespective of location NICE/NCEPOD recommendations
- patient track and trigger
- rapid response
- education training support
- safety and governance
- audit
- rehabilitation
- enhancing service delivery
levels of care
0 = normal ward care in acute hospital
1 = increased observation or intervention. basic support of single organ system. needs met with additional advice / support from critical care. rehab needs not met on standard ward
2 = increased observation, intervention. advanced organ support of 1 system, monitoring and support of 2. level 1 + enhanced nursing needs
3 = advanced respiratory support, advanced support of 2 or more organs
GPICS
Medical
- daytime consultant : patient 1:8 - 1:12
- resident:patient > 1:8
- all resident rota should have basic airway skills
- 24/7 access to doctor / ACCP with advanced airway skills
Nursing
- level 3 = 1:1
- level 2 = 1:2
- supernumerary senior nurse (1 per 10 beds)
- < 20% temporary staff per shift
key standards around admission
– decision to admit discussed with consultant
- once decision to admit, admission within 4hrs
- clear TEP
- consultant in person review within 12hrs, or sooner
- non-clincal transfer minimised
MDT
daily input from nursing, micro, pharmacy, physiotherapy
regular input from dietetics, SALT, psychology
standards around discharge
- follow up programme
- OP appt 2-3 months post hospital discharge
- discharge in hours
- standardised handover
- structured rehab programme
When are scoring systems used in critical care
- illness severity scores e.g. SOFA
- Outcome prediction models e.g. APACHE II
- Decision support tools e.g. NEWS
physiological scoring systems assess and monitor outcomes and treatments for service evaluation and research. ISS is anatomical not physiological.
types of scoring systems
illness severity scoring systems
diseased specific scoring systems
Illness severity scoring systems
- APACHE II = acute physiology and chronic health evaluation. worse score first 24hrs. max score 71. Age, acute physiology (vitals, biochemical), chronic disease (cirrhosis, NYHA4, resp, dialysis, immune). AUROC 0.85. 25 = 50% mortality
- SAPS (simplified acute pjusology) AUROC 0.86. similar to apache
- SOFA - sequential organ failure assessment. repetitive every 48hrs. each organ system 0 - 4 (max 24)
- POSSUM - surgical patients
- TISS - therapeutic intervention score - assessment of nursing workload. worse scores correlate with worse outcomes
disease specific scoring systems
CAP - CURB65 - risk of death at 30 days increased
UGI bleeding - rockall - risk of rebleeding. GBS - likelihood of endoscopy.
Pancreatitis - Glasgow score 3 = severe acute. ransom
liver - MELD, child Pugh, kings criteria
PE - wells score
GRACE score - mortality in ACS
AF - CHA2DS2VASC - risk of stroke
Disease specific illness severity score
MELD - predicts 3 month mortality in patient with cirrhosis. help to guide transplant. 4 values
- bilirubin
- creatinine
- sodium
- INR
6 - 40 % mortality
predict short term mortality in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding, acute alcoholic hepatitis, surgery
limitations of scoring systems
data accuracy e.g. subjective components
applicability to cohort
changing predictive ability e.g. withdrawal on patient with 95% mortality = 100% mortality
evaluation of scoring systems
discrimination - how well score discriminates between those who will die and those who will survive. AUROC observed vs predicted mortality. reaonsable > 0.7 excellent > 0.9. eg apache II 0.85. coin toss 0.5
calibration = how close predicted values are to observed values
validity = how well it reflects reality. internal and external. sofa outside icu but poor validity within.
ideal scoring system
- valid to your population
- simple
- discriminates (survivors from non survivors)
- calibrated (degree of accuracy)
qSOFA
screening for risk of death from infection outside icu
2/3 of BP < 100 GCS < 15 RR > 22
better than sofa, sirs in this context
not used to diagnose sepsis
scores in relation to admission to crucial care
- caution in interpretation
- not designed to support decisions regarding admission
- likely inaccurate when used on individual level
- individualised decision making
- no clear mortality cut off
- probabilities for whole populations - provide additional information to a patient centred decision making process
monitoring service quality
standardised mortality ratio
observed / predicted number of deaths
predicted based on apache
SMR > 1 worse than predicted
limitations
- coding / data quality
- does not reflect icu care alone (pre-icu care)
- excludes readmissions, transfers
- only measures in hospital deaths
Other measurements of service quality
measurement of structure, process or outcome
can be described as minimum standard or quality indicator
structure
- min standard - 2x consultant ward round, infection surveillance, participation in national audit, nurse:patient ratio
- quality indicator- nurse staffing and skill, pharmacist presence
process
- min standard - night time discharges, bundles
- quality indicators - delirium screening, rehab assessment, EOLC
outcome
- min standard - SMR, early discharge, m+m
- quality indicators - patient surveys
What are the hazards of patient transport
patient
- dislodgement of tubes, lines
- deterioration en route
- loss of temp control
- drugs - run out, need for emergency
- equipment - o2, ventilator malfunction
- lack of back up / support
- loss of information during handover
staff
- motion sickness
- physical injuries
- disruption of shift work
organisational
- staffing ratios / on call cover
classification of transfers
by location - primary, secondary, tertiary
indication - clinical, non-clinical, repatriation
urgency - time critical, urgent, routine
mode of transport - foot, road, air
how do you carry out a transfer
clear decision making and communication. checklists
1. decision making
2. personell
3. equipment
4. patient
decision making related to transfer
- patient stable?
- urgency identified
- indication identified
- benefit outweighs risk
- patient and relative informed
- received hospital airway and consultant accepting
Personnel
- doctor - trained in transfer with appropriate skills
- nurse / ode - traipsed in transfer and familiar with equipment
- paramedic crew
- specialist e.g. perfusionist