Option B: Psychology of Sport Flashcards
Define personality
“Those relatively stable and enduring aspects of individuals which distinguish them from other people, making them unique but at the same time permit a comparison between individuals”. (Gross, 1992)
SLT-Bandura (1977)
Suggested that behaviour is learned from the environment through a process of observational learning. Even without rewards presents.
• Personality structures appear to be cognitive
o They relate to knowing, being ware, thinking, learning & judging.
Four constructs need to be taken into account to get a full understanding of SLT:
• Competencies & skills.
• Beliefs & expectancies.
• Behavioural (evaluative) standards.
• Personal goals.
According to Pervin et al (2005)
Interactionist view-Lewin (1937)
Suggested that neither nature nor nuture can account for an individual’s behaviour and personality.
Proposes that they are developed through a constant interaction between the person and their environment.
B= f(P, E)
Behaviour is a function of the person and their environment.
This suggests that personality can only be understood when personal and situational factors together, into account.
A fundamental part of who we are depends on our genes.
Mischel et al (2003)
takes a social-cognitive approach, and is interested in 4 personality variables:
• Competencies-our skills & knowledge.
• Encoding strategies- our particular style & the schemas we use in processing information.
• Expectancies- what we expect from our behaviour an our anticipation of our performance levels.
• Plans-what we intend to do.
The interaction with environmental situations results in the expression of personality. How does an individuals personality unfold, or develop, across different social situations
Issues with the measurement of personality
• Data collection: o Interviews o Questionnaires o Observation • Validity: o Bias • Ethical issues: o Confidentiality o Use of the results o Prediction of performance (demand characteristics) • Volume of data: o What’s relevant o Do those providing the information have a bias? o Do the observers? • Data from an individual: o Accurate o Might want to be painted in a positive light o Able to truly assess mental state? -denial
Need to be situation specific, individually orientated and micro-analytic.
Beware of limitations and flaws.
Evaluate the issue in personality research and sports performance
Consider
athletes versus non-athletes: may discourage non-sportspeople from attempting sports that don’t ‘fit’ their personality
personality and sport type: if a personality is assigned to a sport, those not demonstrating will be less likely to take up the sport as they do not think that they suit the stereotype of the sport.
predicting performance: implications of predicting performance, rather than it be a natural progression and taking into consideration environmental factors
Define motivation
‘the internal mechanisms and external stimuli which arouse and direct out behaviour’.
(Sage, 1974)
Intrinsic motivation
• Comes from within.
• We derive pleasure/satisfaction from participation.
o Excitement, fun, enjoyment, improvement.
Extrinsic motivation
• Comes from external rewards.
o Money, trophies, prizes.
o Less tangible: praise status.
Addictive principle
intrinsic motivation is boosted by extrinsic motivators.
Deci and Ryan (1985)
• Developed cognitive evaluation theory. o If performance is driven by intrinsic motivation, extrinsic rewards may reduce intrinsic motivation. • They divided rewards into 2 types: o Controlling rewards: Trophies, praise Given to control an individual o Informational rewards Convey information about competence in a particular task. Increase intrinsic motivation.
McClelland (1961) Atkinson (1974)
Theory of Achievement Motivation
• They argued that motivation is a balance between the motive to achieve success and the motive to avoid failure.
• Sport environment is entered into with an approach-avoidance conflict.
• On one hand- want to succeed. (NACH)
• On the other hand. (NAF)
• Achievement motivation= desire to succeed-fear of failure.
• AM is a personality trait.
• For some desire to succeed outweighs the fear of failure.
=high achievement motivation. (NAF)
• This is also influenced by the situational factors.
Probability and incentive for success.
• 5 components contribute to NACH theory:
1. Personality factors.
2. Situational factors.
3. Resultant tendencies.
4. Emotional reactions.
5. Achievement related behaviours.
Behaviours of high achievers
Select challenging tasks
Display high levels of effort
Continue to try hard in difficult situations
Focus on pride and success
Behaviours of low achievers
Avoid challenging activities
Exert less effort when they take part
Exert less persistence when they take part
Focus on shame of failure
Goal orientation theory
-Nichollos (1989)
• In achievement setting:
• Main concern is to demonstrate high ability.
o Avoid demonstrating low ability.
• Ability can be viewed in different ways.
• This is based on two states of goal involvement:
o Task involvement.
o Ego involvement.
Task involvement
Focus is on: • Task mastery. • Learning skills. • Exerting effort. • Self-improvement.
measure their success against themselves, how well they complete a task (personal bests) (Intrinsic motivation)
Ego involvement
Focus in on:
• Demonstrating superior ability.
• Winning competitions.
• Exerting only minimal effort.
measure their success based on beating others and being the best (Extrinsic motivation)
3 factors that determine motivation according to goal orientation theory
- Achievement goals.
- Perceived ability.
- Achievement behaviour.
How might perceived ability effect motivation in those who are task or ego orientated?
Task:
o Perceived ability not relevant, success self-referenced.
Ego:
o Perceived ability high relevant, need to demonstrate high ability.
o Appears to be a stable trait
Attribution Theory
This is the focus on the reasons we use to explain success and failure
How we attribute success and failure will affect:
• Future expectations.
• How you feel.
• Motivation.