Observations Flashcards
Participant observation
When researcher joins groups to get inside perspective and deeper understanding
“ Go native “
Getting to attached
Non - participant observation
When researcher does not join groups. Stands out taking notes effectively
- people who are observed do not behave naturally = reactivity ( will invalidate data )
Covert
When gorups does not know they are being observed. If asked > lies ( decrease demand characteristics but not always ethical )
Overt
When groups know they are being observed, and if asked are opened to answer
Naturalistic
A type of observation in peoples natural habitat
Strength - high ecological validity and are sometimes ethical
Event sampling
When researcher takes notes on only the behavior that is being studied
Point sampling
When researcher notes each participants behavior individually
Time sampling
When researcher only notes behavior in a regular time interval
Field notes
Account of what has been observed
Strengths of participant observation
- Provides detailed and in-depth knowledge of topic
- Avoids researcher bias because the researcher seek to understand how and why the social processes are the way they are, instead of imposing their own reality on the phenomenon
- Holistic interpretation, because researcher takes into account as many aspects as possible of that a particular group of people, in order to synthesize observations. The researcher uses material from the participants themselfes to generate theory and tries to explain one set of observations in therms of its relationship with others
Limitations on participant observations
- Difficult to record data promptly and objectively
- time - consuming and demanding. Demanding, the researcher needs to be physically present and live the life of people they are studying. Time consuming, data analysis, arrive at an account that is reasonably objective and contextually sensitive.
Strengths of naturalistic observations
- high ecological validity ( collection of data takes place in the participants natural enviroment, assumed that participants will behave as they usually do )
- used to collect data that would be impossible or unethical otherwise
Limitations of naturalistic observations
- Risk that people will vreact to being observed ( reactivity involved )
- Checking the data ( if researcher collects it alone )
- Ethical considerations concerning the appropiateness of observing stranters without their knowledge
Inter-observer reliability
Multiple observers in the same time field can compara data to ensure a match of the data
Sample
A nature of the group of participants
Opportunity sampling
A sample of whoever happens to be there and agrees to participate
Sampling bias
A sample is collected in such a way that some members of the intended population are less likely to be included than others
Snowball sampling
Participants recruit other participants among their friends and acquaintances
Participant variability
The extent to which the participants may share a common set of traits that can bias the outcome of the study
Random sampling
Sample in which every member of the target population has an equal chance of being selected
Generalization
Application of research to a larger population
Stratified sample
Draws random sample from each subpopulation within the target population
Informed consent
Participants must be informed about the nature of a study and agree to participate