obedience: situational variables Flashcards

1
Q

what are situational variables?

A

features of immediate physical and social environment which may influence a persons behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the situational variables Milgram investigated?

A
  • location
  • proximity
  • uniform
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

location variations Milgram found?

A
  • original study was in Yale uni
  • run down office block= obedience rates dropped to 47.5%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

proximity variations Milgram found?

A
  • original study, the teacher and learner were in adjoining rooms
  • teacher and learner in same room= obedience dropped to 40%.
  • decreased to 20% when experimenter delivered instructions to the teacher via telephone.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

uniform variations Milgram found?

A
  • original study the lab coat added authority/status to the experimenter meaning the P’s more likely to obey
  • experimenter replaced by ordinary citizen, obedience dropped to 20%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

percentage of shocks delivered for standard procedure

A

65%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

proximity

percentage of shocks delivered for victim silent

A

100%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

percentage of shocks delivered for p paired with 2 confederates who refuse to obey

A

10%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

explanation of uniform

A
  • adds legitimacy to authority eg police
  • when experimenter called away and replaced by ordinary citizen obedience decreased to 20%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

explanation of proximity

A
  • proximity= physical distance between teacher and learner
  • distance increases= obedience decreases as p’s physically saw effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

explanation of location

A
  • adds more legitimacy to authority
  • run down office= obedience decrease to 47.5%
  • see as less serious so less likely to do it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

evaluation

A

L: lack of internal validity
L: ‘obedience alibi”
S: research support- Bickman
S: cross-cultural replications
S: control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bickman research support

A
  • found that people on the street obeyed a stranger when asked to do everyday tasks (pick up litter, move away from bus stop)
  • more when he was dressed in uniform (security guard) over a milkman/normal clothes.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how is there conflicting evidence with the obedience alibi?

A
  • Mandel (1998) argued that Milgram’s
    research provides an excuse (or ‘alibi’) for
    evil behaviour.
  • explain behaviour of Nazi’s as due to situational variables
  • socially sensitive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how is there lack of internal validity?

A
  • Orne and Holland- p’s could have
    worked out the procedure was fake.
  • socially desirable results reduce validity
  • questions findings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how is there high degree of control?

A
  • manipulated variables in each situation, standardised + operationalised
  • even when variables were changed still kept standardised
  • use of lab experiment
17
Q

how is there cross cultural replications?

A
  • Miranda et al. (1981) found an obedience rate
    of over 90% amongst Spanish students.
  • high reliability
  • generalise findings across cultures