Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

BIBLE > NT GOBBET > Flashcards

NT GOBBET Flashcards

1
Q

The Mission of the Twelve

A

luke 9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

luke 9

A 
The Mission of the Twelve
Herod’s Perplexity
Feeding the Five Thousand
Peter’s Declaration about Jesus
Jesus Foretells His Death and Resurrection
The Transfiguration
Jesus Heals a Boy with a Demon
Jesus Again Foretells His Death
True Greatness
Another Exorcist
A Samaritan Village Refuses to Receive Jesus
Would-Be Followers of Jesus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

luke 15

A

The Parable of the Lost Sheep
The Parable of the Lost Coin
The Parable of the Prodigal and His Brother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

luke 16

A

The Parable of the Dishonest Manager
The Law and the Kingdom of God
The Rich Man and Lazarus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

luke 22

A 
The Plot to Kill Jesus
The Preparation of the Passover
The Institution of the Lord’s Supper
The Dispute about Greatness
Jesus Predicts Peter’s Denial
Purse, Bag, and Sword
Jesus Prays on the Mount of Olives
The Betrayal and Arrest of Jesus
Peter Denies Jesus
The Mocking and Beating of Jesus
Jesus before the Council
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Luke 9 context

A

broadly keeping with MK in ‘ministry to galilee section’
luke omits: straight from 5000 to peter’s declaration

transfiguration between demonstrations of Jesus power/messiah and jesus reframing it with the intention of going to the cross

emphasis on incomprehension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

luke 9 contribution

A

disenfranchised: unexpected new leaders
continuation: feeding 12/ moses, elijah
good news: 9.26 kingdom of god
israel’s failure to recognise its own messiah: incomprehension
reversal: magnificat/ 9.46 child
liberation: exodus, messiah suffer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the mission of the 12

A 
luke 9.1-6
'then'
not taking provision= test of welcome Bovon
- LTJ: wandering cynic philo
v6 'good news'
- luke 4 sermon using Isaiah

good news= kingdom of god
rem of Isaiah in Lk 4.18

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

herod’s perplexity

A

9.7-9
omits extended account of John’s death
elijah: ref to malachi 4:5 and messianic expectation of 2nd temple p

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

feeding of the 5000

A 
9.10-17
K of G para 9.2/6 and manifesto 4
omit disciple complaint
rapid fire dialogue: dif perspective
para ch22 4 vebal points and idea of giving thanks
12 basket= 12 tribes
bovon
-omit mk 2nd feeing of 4000 7 basket = 70 gentile nations
- wildernes: provision of god to israel
emph on ppl satiety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Peter’s declaration about jesus

A 
9.18-20
turning point
structurally setting up for transfiguration sandwich 
reappearance of elijah
messiah (peter) faulty for Jesus
omits peter's rebuke: smooth path to T
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Jesus foretells his death and resurrection

A

9.21-27
LTJ 2/3 passion predictions mentioned in 9
- 3rd mentioned in 18 also in geo structure
“elder, chief, priest and scribes”= jewish court

pivot christ: son of man (dan 7) preferred
reversal dynamic life= death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

the transfiguration

A 
9.28-36
departure point of focus with moses and elijah
moses= law
elijah= prophet
neither had face to face
9.31 ref to exodus
aim= establish compatibility of suffering messiah
voice from the cloud
- this is my son david ps 2
- the chosen one isaiah 42
- listen to him deut 18 :) combo
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Jesus heals a boy with a demon

A 
9.37-43
rep of transfi rhythm
rebuke 'how much longer must I be with you"
- echo departure: exodus
deut 32.5 God exasperated with Israel
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Jesus again foretells his death

A

9.43-50
dispute of greatness
child
ironic: disciples try to stop someone from healing who actually has the faith to heal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

a samaritan village refuses jesus

A

9.51-56
geo turning point
basic rhythm of T
why are the disciples wrong if in 10.13-15 Jesus condemns a town for rejecting him (after showing miracle)
- because he had not yet reached jerusalem

17
Q

the would be followers of jesus

A

9.57-62
closely linked to 9.18-27
cost of following jesus= daily taking cross

discipleship involves to forego the hope of worldly resources, willingness to reconsider socially important prioritites, disregard even good things like friends

18
Q

luke 15 context

A

only synoptic para 1-7 w/Matt 18
- did lk us M/M or M/M use luke??

rich portrayal of the complex messaih w/ lostness

local context: structure
balance: male (sheep) female (coin)
- broader patter
birth prophecies: songs of zechariah and mary
healing of the servant centurion/widow son

19
Q

luke 15 contribution

A

disenfranchised: male and female balance
continuation: OT reg cleanliness, dishonour of son, working for gentile, ezekial shepherd ref
reversal: lost are found, younger son willing to be a servant/ older feels like a servant
christology: king-servant messiah seeks
soteriology: cost of seeking (coin)
ethics/ethnic: gentile (young) jew (older) Xcyril

20
Q

the parable of the lost sheep

A

15.1-7
need for messiah
jesus responds to scribes and pharisee about his association with sinners
wilderness- reckless? x: grassland/pasture

real life scenario: intuitive/right
sheep not sinners: no moral accountability and contamination
sheeps inherently valued
jesus is not worried about sinners contaminting him= other-wordly

shepherd’s reaction is diametrically opposed to P/S reactions

shares joy with friends
- rep in next parable
jesus’ understanding of heavenly society
- P/S at a distance from heavenly world-view

21
Q

the parable of the lost coin

A 
15.8-10
coin=intuive: no moral accountability/ contamination
difficult nature of search
- lamp= expense/duration after dark
- sweeping= dedication
- carefully

shared joy
religious elite do not share Jesus’ view

22
Q

the parable of the prodigal son and his brother

A

most sig/influential in global literature
belongs with preceding of sheep and coin
but devs moral issue
- no common consensus: grave social sin of aksing for inheritance (implying you wish your father to be dead)

no search for son
father waits for him to ‘come to his senses’
- father looks for older son

= rep gentile (younger) and jew (israel older) relationship with god?
social outcasts/sinners generally come looking for jesus and Jesus be healing them is actively seeking them

rejoicing dynamic is present
- acknowledgement of guilt heard but not renunciation of sonship
LTS ‘we had to celebrate and rejoice’
- for luke the recognition of humna need is greater than the law

register shift to personal relationships

older son does not want to be contaminated

  • sends servants to see what is happening
  • ’ you may be happy to call him son but I am not happy to call him brother’

by alligning himself with the father, Jesus is radically critiquing contemporary ethics

younger vs older son

  • gnostic/valentinian: human vs angels (who are jealous of humans redemption by God
  • early church: gentile (sin= idolatry) vs jew (sin= hard heart)
    • X cyril: older brother kept all commandments
23
Q

luke 16 context

A

largely independent from M/M
apart 16.13 and 16.17
- matt: impossibility of serving two masters is free standing
- in luke: it is the conclusion of the dishonest manager parable

parallel to sermon on the mount in matt

structure/local context
- superficially united by engagement with the subject of wealth

24
Q

luke 16 contribution

A

disenfranchised: poor
continuation: OT
- 16.14-18 law’s authority?
- 16.18 divorce harsher than OT law
- 16.29 Abraham
good news: rich man wants to warn brother
reversal: rich man and lazarus
ethics: divorce

25
Q

the parable of the dishonest manager

A

16.1-13
use of morally ambiguous character is not untypical of luke (parable of friend woken at midnight lk11)

‘then’- same temporal time frame? but dif audience of ‘disciple’ vs previous ‘P/S’
greek: then= ‘and’ (jesus simply takes disciples to one side?)

surprise: master’s happy reaction
- he rates the insight into the man’s heart greater than money

manager acted ‘prudently/shrewdly’ vs b4 ‘squandered’

v. 8-9 distinction between life in this world and eternal life in the world to come
- ‘the children of this age’= ppl who live w/o knowledge of the coming age vs children of the light

friends by dishonest wealth
- investing resources at your disposal in those who will be inhabitants and influences in the age to come esp least/lost
- affirmed by lazarus/rich man
! controversial: rewards in heaven for actions on earth..

God as debt reducer (lost son parable)

true riches? synoptic ref
masters= god and wealth
the manager’s master is wealth because his horizons are limited to his age vs Jesus

26
Q

The law and the kingdom of God

A

16.14-18
teaching of foregoing parable applied to pharisees
- living within the intellectual framework of ‘this age’

Jesus feels he needs to clarify that he is not agaisnt the law
- his problem: their actions/attitudes are shaped by a wordview whose assumptions are constrained by here/now

divorce: LTJ articulates a standard harsher than the law (OT)
- he is more committed to the ongoing relevance of the law than his opponents

27
Q

the rich man and lazarus

A

16.16-31
w/background info parable is v well crafted
- if the parable of the dishonest manager highlighted the difference between living under the rubric of the current age or the coming age
- the parable of the rich and and lazarus graphically spells the difference out
– no thought beyond end of physical life= eternal consequences

‘bosom of Abraham’= intimacy
rags to riches for Lazarus

rich man= shrewd manager?

reversal: who needs whose help?

abraham= moral accountability

  • impossibility of going back
  • rich man’s appeal to Abraham is contextualised by John the baptist’s remarks about insufficiency of simply claiming abraham as father and the necessity of bringing forth works in keeping with repentance

allusion to Jesus’ death
- ‘neither will they be convinced even if someone from the dead rises’

28
Q

Luke 22 context

A

Lk journey ends with ‘triumphant’ entry ch19
prepared us jesus self-conscientious identificiation

synoptic parallel:last supper/crow prophecy

  • lk intro/meal prep= mk
  • unique: jesus speech b4 meal/ satan (judas/peter)
  • omits Mk intro to betrayal/soldier weapons
  • dispute about greatness (
29
Q

Luke 22 contribution

A

continuation:
- ‘new covenant in my blood’ Jeremiah
- 12 disciples as judges for 12 tribes of Israel
- ‘take this cup from me’ jer= cov
- - pop culture: dumbledore

reversal: servant leadership- passing cup

Hellenistic tone: death of philosopher
grief for disciples not jesus

soteriology: eucharistic celebration

30
Q

Jesus predicts Peter’s denial

A

31-34
satan mk- peter is accused of being satan by jesus
satan in lk 4- jesus affirmed his identity x3 vs Peter denies x3
‘all of you’: emph of testing for all disciples
peter’s ‘return’= conversion

31
Q

purse bag and sword

A

35-38
rev of lk 9.3 (original instruction)
Jesus rhetorical Q recalls the sufficiency of God’s provision
LTJ: original instruction was to facilitate assessment of the household they were to enter but here they will not be welcomed

Isaiah 53.2 ‘trangressors’ ref

  • disciples need to arm themelves
  • Jesus feared he would be killed in the garden and not on the cross
    • fulfiling isaiah 53.12 by divine knowledge
32
Q

JEsus prays on the mount of olive

A

38-46
emph on Jesus’ foresight
- why does he urge them to pray against temptation if he knows they will betray him

‘cup’ (last supper ref LTJ)

  • dying with covenantal obligation
  • Jeremiah: god’s judgement 25.15 against =cup

jesus isolation= sufficiency as saviour

v40 connection to lord's prayer 
v41 little psychic distress
'agony' = physical effort relate to hellenic 
v45 'grief' for disciples not jesus
= philo
33
Q

The betrayal and the arrest

A

47-53
kiss- synoptic
- OT: Jaob used to mark murderous intention towards his brother Amamsa (2 sam 20/9)
- hellen: sign of reconciliation (WEIMA)

all 4 mention swords but only Lk mentions the healing of the ear
- hellenistic norm: uphold value until the end

34
Q

Peter denies Jesus

A

54-62
- number 3: hebrew idiom=decisive identification (temptation)

v61 prophetic

  • only in Lk: jesus turns towards peter
  • not only did jesus know he knew the exact moment
  • prophetic vocab ‘peter remembered the word of the lord’
35
Q

the mocking and the beating of Jesus

A

63-65

pattern: luke sanitises the raw edges of mark
- no ref to spitting

guards know of Jesus’ rep

  • mocking prophetic ability (LTJ ironic)
  • religious mocking= mocking god

J determined purpose: no need to fight
- suffering servant: transfiguration

36
Q

Jesus before the council

A 
66-71
omit false witness/accusation that Jesus would destroy the temple
focus on Jesus' identity
Jesus highlights hard heart of accusers
- progressive theme
Dan 7 son of man
- claim to divinity as messiah

Jesus accusers affirmed that he was the son of God ‘you therefore are the son of god?’

messiah: politically charged term constantly needs to be recontextualised by Jesus’ ref to son of man

BIBLE (9 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions