Negligence Evaluation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

1Duty of Care A01

A

Donoghue-v-Stevenson
Replaced by Caparo which set out damage reasonably forseeable, Proximity, Fair just reasonable
Only if in a novel situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1Duty of Care A01 Cases

A

Langley
Bourhill
Hill and Robinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

1Duty of Care A03

A

Judges unelected left to make the decisions
Difficult to predict outcome and advise client
D owes duty of care to too many people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

1Duty of Care A03 However

A

More people protected
C can claim against police
Distribute loss fairly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

2 Breach of duty of care A01

A

D will normally be compared to reasonably ordinary person objective blyth test Learners standard of competent drivers, profession, age and time
Risk factors considered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

standard of competant driver case

A

Nettleship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

judged by profession case

A

Bolam

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Characteristics case

A

Paris

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Probability case

A

Bolton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2 Breach of duty of care A03

A

More likely fault will be with D as reasonable person would not of done what D did
Compare learner drivers to competant drivers
Bolam test means D does not have to tell all risks involved.
C injured and may not get compensation but costs for loosing the case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

2 Breach of duty of care A03 However

A

Law covers people with special characteristics and needs
D not expected to spend lots of money removing risk
compare young people to same as their age
stability as judged on same level of profession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

3 Causation A01

A

Factual causation but for test
Forseeable damage
Not exact events
Thin skull rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

3 Causation A03

A

Remote damage needs to be compensated
Must prove BOP which may be difficult
Judges not experts in practical issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

3 Causation A03 However

A

Injury must not be too remote
Injuries must be reasonably forseeable
Causation requires legal link between D’s actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

4 relies on proof of fault A01

A

Onus burden is on C to prove claim of BOP. Fault means C has to prove case. Make Links to tort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

4 relies on proof of fault A03

A

Cost
Delay
Lawyers

17
Q

Reforms

A

state run compensation scheme
Compulsory liability insurance
Encourage greater use of ADR

18
Q

State run compensation scheme

A

Compensation to road accidents and accident at work victims without explanation and funded by general tax.

19
Q

State run compensation scheme Advantages

A

Removes need for insurance companies involvement
Reduce delays
No need to go court

20
Q

State run compensation scheme disadvantages

A

Expensive
who will pay
people less careful

21
Q

Compulsory liability insurance

A

If every adult was insured C would recieve compensation in event of accident.

22
Q

Compulsory liability insurance however

A

Expensive
dealing with insurance companies
Not everyone would get it.

23
Q

Encourage greater use of ADR

A

Good because it avoids confrontation between C and D.

24
Q

Encourage greater use of ADR however

A

Compensation Act 2006 Encourage more ADR and had little effect.