Negligence Flashcards
BOP
The burden of proof is on C to provide evidence. If C has no evidence then the claim will fail.
OBOP
It will be judged on the Balance of Probabilities. It needs to be decided that it is 51% likely to have happened.
Negligence is defined in …
Blyth ‘failing to do something the reasonable person would or would not do ‘
What 3 tests are applied?
- The objective Test
- Three part Caparo test
- The Blyth test
The objective Test
D is compared to the ordinary, reasonable person performing that task.
> Professionals are held to the standard of their profession. Montgomery
> A child is judged by their age. They are not compared to an adult. Mullins
> A learner is compared to the experienced driver. Nettleship
Montgomory
A doctor didn’t warn pregnant woman of birth risks.
Mullins
A school girl playing with ruler and blinded classmate. 14 year old was compared to the ordinary 14 year old
Nettleship
A learner crashed the car and injured the instructor.
The … part … Test
Three Part Caparo Test
Determines if there is a duty of care between the Claimant and Defendant
3 parts
- Was the damage or injury reasonably foreseeable.
- Is the relationship between the claimant and defendant proximate? Where D should have C in contemplation. Donaghue
- It is fair, reasonable, and just to impose a duty of care onto D?
Donaghue
Decomposing snail in drink. Company should have C in contemplation.
The last Test
The Blyth test is used to determine if there has been a breach in the duty of care.
The Blyth Test
- The breach has caused damage that isn’t too remote. Where the damage is likely from Ds negligence.
- The risk factors are considered
> Special characteristics
>High or low risk
>Ease/cost of avoidance
Causation
Factual causation applies the ‘but for Test’
Legal causation asks is it fair to blame D? C doesnt need to prove Ds breach was the main cause of injury/damage. Only that it materially contributed to the injury/damage.
Barnett
posion
State the law
The burden of proof is on C. C must provide evidence of Ds negligence. Otherwise the claim will fail.
Judged on the balance of probabilities. It needs to be determined to be 51% likely.
Negligence is defined in Blyth, ‘failing to do something the reasonable person would or would not do.’
The objective test is applied. D is compared to the reasonable person performing the task.
> A professional is compared to their standard of profession. Montgomory.
>A learner is compared to the experienced person. Nettleship.
>A child is judged in comparison to their age. Mullin
3 Part Caparo Test is applied to determin is there is a duty of care between D and C.
1. Is the damage/injury reasonably foreseeable?
2. Is the relationship proximate? Should D have C in contemplation. Donaghue.
3. Is it fair, reasonable and just to impose a duty of care onto D?
The Blyth test is used to determine if this duty of care has been breached.
1. The breach has caused damage that isn’t too remote. Meaning it is likely a result from Ds negligence.
2. The risk factors are considered
- Special characteristics, such as sensitivities that C has that a normal person would not.
- Was the risk high or low?
- Ease/cost of avoidance
Factual causation applies the ‘but for’ test. Barnett
Legal causation asks is it fair to blame D? C doesn’t need to prove Ds breach was the main cause of injury/damage, just that it materially contributed to the injury/damage.