Nationalism Flashcards
Liberal nationalist thinkers
Rousseau
Mazzini
Woodrow Wilson
Conservative nationalist thinkers
Herder
Integral nationalist thinkers
Maurras
Anti and post colonial nationalist thinkers
Garvey
Ghandi
Nyerere
Summary of liberal nationalism
Humans are rational, can improve themselves and are capable of living peacefully
Humans naturally want to be free and enjoy democracy
They may feel cultural ties based on language and art (more emphasised by Mazzini than Rousseau) but they believe someone coming to their country from afar can still learn to become a national citizen (inclusive nationalism)
They have classical liberal economic ideas that people should trade, this will also have the added benefit of leading to peace
Summary of conservative nationalism
Humans are more emotional/cultural than rational
They are strongly attached to language and the historic roots of their locality, believing it would take many generations for any foreigner to become a citizen,’exclusive’ form of nationalism’ although they may be more accepting than integrals
These nationalists could be racialist – race is very important - but not necessarily overtly racist (see below).
Summary of integral nationalism
Taking conservative nationalism further by arguing national pride and cohesion is not just important it is integral to the essence of human nature
Pessimism about human nature means they distrust other nations who may start wars
Economically, more likely to be protectionist or mercantilist than liberals
Nationalism is not just based on common history/language but on the racial basis of the state therefore distrust/persecute different races, especially Jewish people who have been scattered (in a diaspora) and are always more loyal to their own people than the nation in which they live
These nationalists are either racialist (race is very important) or racist (their race is superior).
Summary of anti/post colonial nationalism
Tend to have liberal view of human nature as rational; only Garvey, not a typical anti/post colonial nationalist rejects rational with his emphasis on race, African ethnicity and the need to get back to an African culture. But the rest believe humans can improve/progress because they have inherited borders that do not usually correspond to old ethnic or cultural groups and often need to encourage the forging of a new identity eg ‘Tanzanian’. Economically, usually socialist.
Integral
Nationalist feeling is one of the strongest human emotions and motivators
Authoritarian
Humans are naturally unsuited to democracy, benefiting from strong authoritive rulers/dictators
Anti colonial
Someone who fights against the invaders and colonizers of their country
Conservative nationalists views on human nature/society
Sense of national identity pre-dates modern nation state ie person can yearn for it in a natural ‘organic’ way eg Herder Volksgeist, spirit of German nation based on language and history came before birth of unified Germany 1871. They emphasise culture.
‘Culture’ includes REAL
Religion integral nat Maurras thought Catholicism key to French national identity, even anti-colonial Jinnah thought new country Pakistan (1947) should be ‘Islamic state’
Ethnicity
Art (and other culture like music, literature – even liberal Mazzini thought Italian art important
Language particularly stressed by Herder, but again even liberal Mazzini thinks it important and ‘liberal’ Welsh nationalists promote it in schools
War: humans may go to war for selfish reasons (to gain land)
Liberal nationalist view on human nature/society
Believe nationalism is less ‘natural’, and is exaggerated by conservative nationalists. Rousseau only started to develop ideas about nationalism because he thought that as ties to monarchy and church weakened, people would need to have new ties and these would need to unite social classes. Developed idea that people in a geographical area express a ‘common or general will’ and this underpins nation state. Nation state could pre-date a sense of nationalism and shape it, rather than the other way round.
Belief in rationality of humans means they embrace the chance to become better educated and free.
Nations should be democratic and nationalism is civic, calling people citizens (not subjects) and giving them rights makes them proud.
Because nationalism based on rational attachment to state a foreigner can quickly become a citizen (inclusive). Humans rationally will be peaceful, avoiding destructive wars. Democratic nations will respect each other’s right to national self determination and support international organisations to keep the peace.
Integral nationalists view on human nature/society
Believe nationalism is less ‘natural’, and is exaggerated by conservative nationalists. Rousseau only started to develop ideas about nationalism because he thought that as ties to monarchy and church weakened, people would need to have new ties and these would need to unite social classes. Developed idea that people in a geographical area express a ‘common or general will’ and this underpins nation state. Nation state could pre-date a sense of nationalism and shape it, rather than the other way round.
Belief in rationality of humans means they embrace the chance to become better educated and free.
Nations should be democratic and nationalism is civic, calling people citizens (not subjects) and giving them rights makes them proud.
Because nationalism based on rational attachment to state a foreigner can quickly become a citizen (inclusive). Humans rationally will be peaceful, avoiding destructive wars. Democratic nations will respect each other’s right to national self determination and support international organisations to keep the peace.
Anti/post nationalists view on human nature/society
More varied than the other three groups. For example Garvey – is he racialist or racist (see previous slide) in excluding whites from Africa??? Other anti/post colonials have claimed to have more multicultural approach although eg in practise Islamic state Pakistan less tolerant to Hindus and arguably at times Hindu dominated India has been Islamophobic (like now)
Some anti/post colonialists believe humans are rational and promote rights and democracy (Nyerere at least in early years) but some such as Garvey believe humans prefer authoritarian rulers
Some believe violence never justified (Gandhi satyagraha principle non violent civil disobedience) others believe it can be justified eg Mau Mau against British 1960s
Liberal nationalists views on the state
Liberals believe people need to be free and therefore the state should be small eg only needs a small police force.
Conservative nationalists views on the state
As before, because humans not suited to democracy, state needs to be powerful eg strong law and order, big police force. Such states may legitimately use expansionist foreign policy or colonialism to pursue war aims of land expansion. States may be mercantilist such as Navigation Acts 18th and early 20th century: GB forbidding other nations from trading with ‘their’ colonies. And 17th and 18th centuries British using piracy to rob eg Spanish galleons, supported by Queen Elizabeth.
Integral nationalists views on the state
Same as cons but more extreme
Anti/post colonial nationalists views on the state
Attitude to state varies depending on whether authoritarian (Garvey) or more liberal (Gandhi). Garvey ‘a race that is solely dependent on another for its economic existence sooner or later dies’ ie similar to ‘autarky’, although more justified because in history of the world whites have been economic exploiters.
Mercantilism
Usually historic referring to using piracy, excluding rivals from trade to wage ‘economic war’ to weaken them.
Protectionism
The belief that nations may be justified in imposing tariffs either to ‘protect’ the home industry or to punish a powerful economic rival (like China)
Liberal internationalism
Sometimes the goals of a liberal nation state such as free trade can best be pursued by nation states giving up some of their sovereignty to an international organisation like the WTO or European Union in effect ‘pooling’ it. The country benefits because a) it continues to have some sovereignty as one of the decision-makers in the international organisation and b) it achieves the goal, which it cannot do on its own.
Socialist Internationalism
Rejects the nation as an appropriate political community into which to divide humanity. We are all ‘global citizens’ sharing common humanity who should be engaged in achieving social justice.
Liberal nationalists views on the economy
Also the state should interfere as little as possible in people’s economic affairs; low taxes, allowing all business people to trade freely by importing and exporting without tariffs, this free trade will make the whole nation grow and prosper. Want free trade world-wide. Therefore, paradoxically, prepared to accept a supra-national body to protect free trade (such as World Trade Organisation today).
Free trade will promote ties of friendship between nations, so less war, which is always bad for the economy. Sometimes known as ‘liberal internationalism’ (see keywords)
Mazzini was an example of a liberal nationalist during industrialisation and mature stage of capitalism. Therefore he also saw democracy as important for giving industrial workers rights, preventing them from turning to revolution.
Remember one ideology that is a counter to all these ‘nationalisms’ is socialist internationalism (need to dissolve national boundaries’ which is far left.