Nationalism Flashcards
Liberal nationalist thinkers
Rousseau
Mazzini
Woodrow Wilson
Conservative nationalist thinkers
Herder
Integral nationalist thinkers
Maurras
Anti and post colonial nationalist thinkers
Garvey
Ghandi
Nyerere
Summary of liberal nationalism
Humans are rational, can improve themselves and are capable of living peacefully
Humans naturally want to be free and enjoy democracy
They may feel cultural ties based on language and art (more emphasised by Mazzini than Rousseau) but they believe someone coming to their country from afar can still learn to become a national citizen (inclusive nationalism)
They have classical liberal economic ideas that people should trade, this will also have the added benefit of leading to peace
Summary of conservative nationalism
Humans are more emotional/cultural than rational
They are strongly attached to language and the historic roots of their locality, believing it would take many generations for any foreigner to become a citizen,’exclusive’ form of nationalism’ although they may be more accepting than integrals
These nationalists could be racialist – race is very important - but not necessarily overtly racist (see below).
Summary of integral nationalism
Taking conservative nationalism further by arguing national pride and cohesion is not just important it is integral to the essence of human nature
Pessimism about human nature means they distrust other nations who may start wars
Economically, more likely to be protectionist or mercantilist than liberals
Nationalism is not just based on common history/language but on the racial basis of the state therefore distrust/persecute different races, especially Jewish people who have been scattered (in a diaspora) and are always more loyal to their own people than the nation in which they live
These nationalists are either racialist (race is very important) or racist (their race is superior).
Summary of anti/post colonial nationalism
Tend to have liberal view of human nature as rational; only Garvey, not a typical anti/post colonial nationalist rejects rational with his emphasis on race, African ethnicity and the need to get back to an African culture. But the rest believe humans can improve/progress because they have inherited borders that do not usually correspond to old ethnic or cultural groups and often need to encourage the forging of a new identity eg ‘Tanzanian’. Economically, usually socialist.
Integral
Nationalist feeling is one of the strongest human emotions and motivators
Authoritarian
Humans are naturally unsuited to democracy, benefiting from strong authoritive rulers/dictators
Anti colonial
Someone who fights against the invaders and colonizers of their country
Conservative nationalists views on human nature/society
Sense of national identity pre-dates modern nation state ie person can yearn for it in a natural ‘organic’ way eg Herder Volksgeist, spirit of German nation based on language and history came before birth of unified Germany 1871. They emphasise culture.
‘Culture’ includes REAL
Religion integral nat Maurras thought Catholicism key to French national identity, even anti-colonial Jinnah thought new country Pakistan (1947) should be ‘Islamic state’
Ethnicity
Art (and other culture like music, literature – even liberal Mazzini thought Italian art important
Language particularly stressed by Herder, but again even liberal Mazzini thinks it important and ‘liberal’ Welsh nationalists promote it in schools
War: humans may go to war for selfish reasons (to gain land)
Liberal nationalist view on human nature/society
Believe nationalism is less ‘natural’, and is exaggerated by conservative nationalists. Rousseau only started to develop ideas about nationalism because he thought that as ties to monarchy and church weakened, people would need to have new ties and these would need to unite social classes. Developed idea that people in a geographical area express a ‘common or general will’ and this underpins nation state. Nation state could pre-date a sense of nationalism and shape it, rather than the other way round.
Belief in rationality of humans means they embrace the chance to become better educated and free.
Nations should be democratic and nationalism is civic, calling people citizens (not subjects) and giving them rights makes them proud.
Because nationalism based on rational attachment to state a foreigner can quickly become a citizen (inclusive). Humans rationally will be peaceful, avoiding destructive wars. Democratic nations will respect each other’s right to national self determination and support international organisations to keep the peace.
Integral nationalists view on human nature/society
Believe nationalism is less ‘natural’, and is exaggerated by conservative nationalists. Rousseau only started to develop ideas about nationalism because he thought that as ties to monarchy and church weakened, people would need to have new ties and these would need to unite social classes. Developed idea that people in a geographical area express a ‘common or general will’ and this underpins nation state. Nation state could pre-date a sense of nationalism and shape it, rather than the other way round.
Belief in rationality of humans means they embrace the chance to become better educated and free.
Nations should be democratic and nationalism is civic, calling people citizens (not subjects) and giving them rights makes them proud.
Because nationalism based on rational attachment to state a foreigner can quickly become a citizen (inclusive). Humans rationally will be peaceful, avoiding destructive wars. Democratic nations will respect each other’s right to national self determination and support international organisations to keep the peace.
Anti/post nationalists view on human nature/society
More varied than the other three groups. For example Garvey – is he racialist or racist (see previous slide) in excluding whites from Africa??? Other anti/post colonials have claimed to have more multicultural approach although eg in practise Islamic state Pakistan less tolerant to Hindus and arguably at times Hindu dominated India has been Islamophobic (like now)
Some anti/post colonialists believe humans are rational and promote rights and democracy (Nyerere at least in early years) but some such as Garvey believe humans prefer authoritarian rulers
Some believe violence never justified (Gandhi satyagraha principle non violent civil disobedience) others believe it can be justified eg Mau Mau against British 1960s