Multiple Attatchments and Role of the Father (AO1 + AO3) Flashcards
General arguments father IS/ISN’T as important
ISN’T
- fathers traditionally played a minor role in infant development bc ‘breadwinner’
- biologically unequipped bc different hormones
- women have more oestrogen (biologically suited to forming attachments)
- child-rearing is stereotypically feminine bc of cultural/societal expectations
IS
- role of the father is vital for social development
- just as capable of providing sensitive responsiveness + forming a a strong attachment
Support/Opposition for importance of the father
SUPPORT:
- Van Ijzendoorn
- Field
- Grossman
OPPOSITION:
- Schaffer & Emerson
- Grossman
What did SCHAFFER & EMERSON find regarding research into multiple attachments and the role of the father?
Role of the Father:
- 3% of first attachments were to the father
- majority of infants’ primary attachments were to the mother + father a secondary attachment
(father NOT as important)
Multiple Attachments:
- most infants went on to develop multiple attachments
- 87% had 2 by 18 months
What did VAN IJZENDOORN find regarding research into multiple attachments and the role of the father?
- conducted cross cultural research which showed how babies often form multiple attachments right from the onset in collectivist cultures
- this is because families usually work jointly together in everything, including child-rearing
(father IS as important)
What did GROSSMAN find regarding research into the role of the father?
longitudinal study on affect parents have on later attachments:
- quality of infant attachment w mothers but not fathers related to child’s attachments in adolescence
(father NOT as important) - quality of father’s play w infants related to the quality of adolescent attachments
- suggesting fathers have a different role, more to do w play/stimulation
(father IS as important)
What did FIELD find regarding research into the role of the father?
- filmed 4 month old + compared interaction w primary caregiver mothers, pcg fathers, scg fathers
- found pcg fathers like pcg mothers spent more time smiling, imitating, holding infants in comparison to scg fathers
- suggests fathers can be the more nurturing attachment figure
- key to attachment is level of sensitive responsiveness not gender of parent
(father IS as important)
4 points of PEEL
(multiple attachments + role of the father)
✓ Geiger has supportive research
✕ lacks historical validity
✕ research suggest father’s role is NOT to provide attachment
Geiger has supportive research - EEL
G’s research evidenced how father’s play interactions were more exciting in comparison to the mother’s who were more nurturing - shows importance of the father’s role as a playmate
links to Grossman’s research which demonstrated father’s importance in a child developing social skills + attachments in later life
therefore both mother + father are important for difference reasons
lacks historical validity - EEL
S + E’s study conducted in the 1960’s - found only 3% of pcg was the father
society = very different now bc less stereotypical gender roles + more paternity leave
therefore we may get different results if the study was conducted now
research suggest father’s role is NOT to provide attachment - EEL
the role of the father could be biologically determined i.e lower levels of oestrogen to be less sensitive to infant needs
Hardy conducted research supporting the idea that fathers were less able to detect infant distress than mothers
therefore fathers may not be as important in forming attachments
PICL for multiple attachments + role of the father
Research into multiple attachments and the role of the father is based in the idea of nature - mothers are biologically determined to be the pcg
A strength of nature is that it can help develop treatments and interventions. Interventions can be made for single fathers.
However multiple attachments and the role of the father can be due to other factors e.g. level of sensitive responsiveness in forming attachment
Therefore it may be better to explain multiple attachments and the role of the father using both nature and nurture - the interactionist approach