morality + intimate relations Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is moral development

A

moral development involves changes in thoughts, feelings, and behaviours regarding standards of right and wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the different views of moral development?

A

1) reasoning
2) intuition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

who supported the ‘reasoning’ view of moral development?

A

Kohlberg and Piaget

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the reasoning view of moral development?

A

suggests that people weigh pros/cons of their moral decisions and use logical operations to come to a conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what did J. Haidt suggest about moral development?

A

Intuitionism

–> gut feeling FOLLOWED by reasoning
- suggests that we get a gut feeling about what’s wrong vs. right, and THEN use reasoning to support our judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what does intuitionism suggest that moral decisions are based on?

A

suggests that moral decisions are based on gut feelings/intuition, and reasoning is what we do AFTER the decision to justify our decision
- most of our decisions are quick; we are not always thinking about the implications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is moral dumbfounding?

A

a strong moral judgment or intuition about a particular situation, even when one cannot provide logical reasons to support their judgment

  • convincing ourselves of our own gut feeling & trying to convince other people
  • challenges traditional models of moral reasoning, which assume that moral judgments are based on rational deliberation and can be justified
  • suggests that moral intuitions and emotions play a significant role
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

describe social intuitionism theory

A

developed by: J. Haidt

  • suggests that our moral judgments are mainly driven by rapid, automatic, and intuitive emotional responses rather than conscious reasoning
  • moral judgments are influenced by our gut feelings or intuitions, which are then followed by post hoc reasoning to justify those initial intuitive judgments.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are some factors that may influence our intuition?

A
  • personal experiences
  • cultural norms
  • upbringing
  • evolutionary predispositions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is post hoc reasoning?

A

the reasoning we make after our moral decision (post-rationalization); this is often influenced by our emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

is there proof of judgement-making with animals?

A

yes.

in an example video, we were shown 2 monkeys that we rewarded with a treat for doing a specific action. monkey 1 accepted the cucumber when first give, but wont not accept this on other rounds after observing the other monkey receiving a grape for doing the same thing.

  • monkey believed for feel inequality / jealousy –> knew it wasn’t fair (sense of morality?)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the difference between reasoning and intuition?

A

reasoning: thinking about pros/cons

intuition: gut feeling

both activate DIFFERENT brain circuits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

reasoning & intuition of: train & lever scenario

A

thinking about pulling/not pulling the lever = activates the reasoning areas of the brain

thinking about pushing the heavy man off the bridge = activates the ‘gut feeling’/intuition part of the brain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

why would most people NOT push the heavy man off the train?

A

it’s because of the amount of personal involvement
- pushing the man off the bridge involves visceral touching –> its YOU doing the pushing to kill
- the push would be INTENTIONAL to stop the train (not a side effect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why is pulling the level not the same as pushing the heavy man?

A

because when the lever is pulled, it’s to save the family of 5 (the intention), the 1 person on the other train track is killed as a by-product (side effect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

is distance a key factor in moral judgement?

A

YES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

does reasoning ever override intuition?

A

yes it can. example = cheating

  • overriding the ‘gut feeling’ is often spontaneous
  • proximity counts –> more likely to cheat if not being monitored
  • justifications = everyone else does it, academic pressure, poor teaching, lack of interest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what is the Moral Foundations Theory?

A

developed by J. Haidt

suggests that there are 6 moral foundations that are used for moral judgements. people differ in the weight that they assign to each moral foundation; leads to variations in moral judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what are the categories of adult moral judgement? (from moral foundations theory)

A

C-FALLS

care (versus harm)
- concerns about well-being of others ; feelings of protection and compassion

fairness (versus cheating)
- related to justice, reciprocity and equality

authority (versus subservience)
- relates to hierarchal structures; respect for authority figures

liberty (versus oppression)
- concerns for personal freedom, individual rights

loyalty (versus betrayal)
- focuses on group cohesion; loyalty to family, country, culture, etc.

sanctity (versus degradation)
- recognition for things that are sacred or pure; relates to boundaries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

is moral identity related to / wrapped up in our social identity?

A

yes.

in-group affiliations / peers may cause people to be more focused on different categories of adult moral judgement
- people are impressionable
- prosocial relations is very important for moral development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what is moral identity?

A

an aspect of personality that is present when individuals have moral notions and commitments that are central to their lives
- ex. ‘who am I?’, ‘who do I want to be?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what is fractured morality?

A

a state in which a person’s moral values/beliefs become inconsistent.
- suggests a lack of cohesion or moral integrity
- occurs when there are contradictions or conflicts in moral judgement

this is a normal human aspect of human behaviour; there are many factors that can influence or change our moral values (ex. cultural influence, social/situational pressure, cognitive biases)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

can parenting or trauma influence morality?

A

yes!

experiencing trauma or traumatic parenting may cause people to develop particular fears (ex. fear of love/rejection), which may then cause them to make different moral choices throughout life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what is moral personality/character?

A

suggests that people set moral goals, and that to achieve those goals they must commit to act in accordance with those goals

  • aka. bag of issues (?)
  • a strong moral character involves consistency in living according to one’s values, treating others with respect, and taking responsibility for one’s actions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

what is moral motivation?

A

involves prioritizing moral values over personal values

26
Q

what is the role that parents SHOULD have in their child’s moral development?

A

parents should be modelling character traits if they want their children to have a moral compass and to use these moral values in their life

  • parents don’t have to enforce WHAT the moral values are, but should help them build their OWN moral compass
27
Q

what would happen to those who do not build a moral compass // have nobody to model it for them?

A

child may fall into peer pressure and fail to behave morally

28
Q

what are moral exemplars?

A

people who have led exemplary lives
- those who have a moral personality, identity, character, and set of virtues that reflect moral excellence and commitment

29
Q

what is moral empathy?

A

reacting to another’s feelings with an emotional response that is similar to that person’s feelings

  • requires perspective taking
  • adolescents don’t fully understand empathy for systematic causes (ex. systematic racism) until older
30
Q

what is the difference between prosocial behaviour and altruism?

A

similarities: both involve actions aimed at benefiting others

differences:
Prosocial behavior: Prosocial behavior refers to any action intended to benefit or help others, without necessarily considering the underlying motives or selflessness of the act
- includes acts of kindness, cooperation, sharing, empathy, and supporting others
- can be driven by empathy, social norms, personal values, or the desire for social approval or reciprocity

Altruism: Altruism specifically refers to selfless acts performed with the sole intention of benefiting others, often without expecting any personal gain or reward
- involves a genuine concern for the well-being of others and a willingness to sacrifice one’s own interests or resources to help them
- focus is solely on the welfare of others

ALL acts of altruism can be considered prosocial behavior, but not all prosocial behavior is altruistic

31
Q

simplified difference between prosocial behaviour and altruism?

A

prosocial behaviour = altruistic actions that involve planning and intention

altruism = describes immediate actions that are spontaneous or intuitive for helping others

32
Q

does moral thought lead to moral action?

A

not necessarily. many factors may influence this

33
Q

what is the difference between sympathy and empathy?

A

Sympathy = involves recognizing and acknowledging the emotions of others and expressing concern or support
- sense of care and a desire to offer comfort or help
- may not fully understand or share the same emotional experience

Empathy = the ability to put oneself in another person’s shoes, to experience and feel what they are experiencing
- a personal connection to the emotions of others
- a more complete understanding of their feelings

34
Q

describe the relation between empathy and prosocial behaviour

A

pros:
- empathy can promote prosocial behaviour
- actions aimed at the person’s well-being; genuine perspective taking/desire to help
- requires empathetic regulation

cons:
- too much empathy may ‘freeze’ individuals –> turns focus back to themselves & away from the individual (over-empathizing)
- may not be helpful if too emotionally involved

35
Q

what are the two main theorists in friend & intimate relationships?

A

E. Erikson
- intimacy vs. isolation

H.S. Sullivan
- stages of social needs: same-sex chum (friend) –> romantic partner

in adolescence, people work out what intimacy means and how it fits into their lives; its a time for learning interdependence and sharing

36
Q

what does Erikson suggest for friend/intimate relationships?

A

claims that one must have a firm sense of self BEFORE able to disclose information in relationships
- suggest that diversity in friendships is helpful to figure out who one is/who would suit them as a partner

37
Q

what does Sullivan suggest for friend/intimate relationships?

A

claims that one must have a secure attachment with their person to disclose information
- secure attachment = trust & acceptance
- leads to better sexual relationships

  • minimal peer relationships can lead to low self-esteem or feelings of isolation
38
Q

role of intimacy in adolescence?

A

the need for intimacy increases in adolescence
- desire more peers & relationships
- intimacy provides experience with empathy, trust, caring for others, opportunity taking, support

experience of the positives of intimacy in adolescence can lead to better adult relationships

39
Q

what is Sullivan’s view on friendship in adolescence?

A

suggests our emotional well-being depends on whether or not our social needs are being met
- friends become increasingly important in meeting social needs

40
Q

do quality of friendships matter?

A

YES!

friends who are socially skilled, supportive, and academically involved = DEVELOPMENTAL ADVANTAGES

friends who are coercive, conflict-ridden, and are of low support/poor-quality = DEVELOPMENTAL DISADVANTAGES
- mirror effect (how one group member feels, the more likely others will being to feel the same)

41
Q

is anything being overlooked when discussing the realities of intimacy?

A

yes…
- assumes everyone wants intimacy at the same time and with the same people
–> this needs to be modified…
- many optional and diverse feelings of intimacy and commitment
- non-romantic encounters (ex. sleeping around): labelled as relational instability, but may just be a choice & people can still learn from these types of relationships

42
Q

what are the functions of friendship?

A

SPICE

  • social comparison (where one stands)
  • physical support (assistance, resources)
  • intimacy/affection (close & trusting relationships can lead to self-discovery)
  • companionship (collaboration)
  • ego support (feedback that’s helpful for esteem)
43
Q

what are some effects of secure friendships?

A

positive emotional experiences, and less conflict in tasks with friends and romantic partners

  • early quality relationships predict higher quality ones later in life
  • happier and better well-being
  • provides companionship
44
Q

what is a difference between friendships in adolescence and adulthood?

A

relationships become more integrated in adulthood
- more consistent with those you surround yourselves with
- able to integrate morals/roles/goals of others with sense of self

  • friendships in adolescence are less established (still trying to figure out who to surround oneself with)
45
Q

effects of high quality and low quality relationships in adolescence

A

high quality
- support
- protection
- gain social skills
- trust, loyalty, warmth

low quality
- hostility
- disloyal
- rivalry

46
Q

what are the two types of loneliness?

A

emotional loneliness
- lack of intimate relations

social loneliness
- minimal connection with people; or low opportunity to connect with others

–> loneliness (different than desire for solitude) can have poor mental outcomes

47
Q

what are some implications of people who like to sleep around?

A
  • might be risk-adverse = avoid commitment
  • believe that it’s more risky ro be in long-term relationships
  • less willing to cooperate/co-exist
48
Q

what are the emerging adult lifestyles?

A

solo life
- 15% of adults
- stereotypes: antisocial, lonely, difficult

cohabitation (common-law)
- more likely to divorce
- together because convenient

married
- rates are decreasing
- age of marriage increasing

divorce
- rates are decreasing
- #1 cause = money/financial issues
- predictors: low SES, not religious, divorced parents, low education, early marriage

49
Q

what is bowlby’s internal working model?

A

refers to an individual’s mental representation or framework of expectations, beliefs, and assumptions about oneself and others in relationships

50
Q

what are the different types of attachment?

A

1) secure attachment
- low avoidance & low anxiety

2) anxious-avoidant
- avoids relationships; expects rejection and failure

3) insecure-ambivalent
- desperate to form a relationship; often over-dependent, over-involved, needs reassurance
- wants closeness but afraid of losing it

4) disorganized
- runs hot & cold
- lacks trust with partner; more trusting of strangers
- violence in relationship

51
Q

what are the emerging factors of social and romantic interests?

A

awareness of sexual craving
- desire for sexual gratification

acceptance
- acknowledging oneself as a sexual being

learning
- how to express oneself sexually

control
- knowing what’s comfortable/rejection

gratification
- understanding own body; emotional well-being

52
Q

what are the different types of relationships

A

1) dating

2) hookups
- more than 1/2 of teens report having sex with someone they weren’t dating

3) churning
- episodes of breaking up and getting back together with intimate partners (multiple times)

–> connection between dating/romantic relationships with measure of well-adjustment

53
Q

what are adolescent ideas of friendship?

A

idea that friendship is focused on intimate exchanges of thoughts and feelings

54
Q

what do peer relationships provide opportunities for?

A

practicing social skills and conflict resolution skills

55
Q

what is the role of negative peer pressure?

A

can influence adolescents to make riskier decisions
- deviant peer contagion

56
Q

define deviant peer contagion

A

the process by which peers reinforce problem behaviour by laughing or showing other signs of approval
- this increases likelihood of future problem behaviour

57
Q

when are relationships most influential on one another?

A

when the relationship is close, of quality, and reciprocal

  • the higher the autonomy from peers, the more resilient against influence (resilience increases with age)
58
Q

what is the role of school in relationships?

A

school promotes interpersonal relationships
- transfers social/behavioural norms
- combines different peer communities (more exposure)
- essential for the socialization process

59
Q

what are the different types of peer groups?

A

1) friendships
- reciprocal dyadic relationships

2) cliques
- groups of individuals who interact frequently

3) crowds
- share reputations or images (who people think they are; ex. theatre kids)

–> homophily - those who are similar to one another choose to spend time together (similar in behaviour & attitudes; shape each other’s behaviours)

60
Q

sexless in Japan… how does this relate to sexual attitudes?

A

1) traditional - Japan is a traditionally more reserved culture/country
- may feel pressured to conform to traditional/societal norms
- sense of discomfort / taboo topics of sex

2) lack of social skills - those who are more shy and do not have much social/dating experience may feel unable to explore or maintain relationships (fear of rejection guy)

3) dating attitudes
- may be more focused on other aspects of life; financial, career, personal goals
- view that dating takes too much effort; not interesting

4) hookups
- because of traditional values, may not feel comfortable with casual sexual encounters