Morality in sport Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is morality

A

Nobody can acquire honor by doing what is
wrong”
President Thomas Jefferson, US President,
1801-1809

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the Six-stage sequence (divided into 3 levels) of moral development
and problem solving in relation to moral reasoning?

A

Pre-Conventional Level-
Solving moral conflict through egocentric reasoning
Conventional Level-
Resolve moral conflict through the eyes of groups and society
Post-Conventional Level-
Recognise universal values such as justice and equality.
Moral
decisions based on self-chosen ethical principles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is Bracketed Morality

A

-Moral reasoning in sport is depart from that of
everyday life.
-Moral reasoning in sport is less mature (i.e.,
more egocentric) than in everyday life termed
as “game reasoning”
-Antisocial acts could be deemed more
legitimate in sport contexts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What influences athletes’ moral reasoning?

A

Sport Type:
Contact vs. Non-contact

Moral Atmosphere
refers to a set of collective norms regarding
moral action on the part of group members.

Significant Others
(e.g., coaches, teacher, parents, peers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Rest’s model of moral action(four process)

A

1) Interpret situation and consider courses of action
and welfare for others
2) What ought to be done (moral judgement)
3) What one intends to do (moral intention)
4) Implementing a planned action (moral behaviour)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is Moral Reasoning

A

How a individual resolves a moral conflict.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is Moral Functioning

A

Collective term for moral judgement,

moral intention and moral behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Measurements of moral behaviour

A

Self-report:
Frequency of sport specific moral behaviours

Observation:
Video analysis of behaviours – identify and code moral
acts.

Coach ratings:
Coaches asked to rate frequency of aggressive acts
from their team members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is aggression

A

Aggression - the intention to harm another
individual outside the rules of the activity
(Tenenbaum et al., 1997)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Two types of aggression

A

Instrumental (proactive) – intention to harm
as a means to an end (e.g., external goal of
victory or prestige)

Hostile (reactive) – directed to another
following provocation (e.g., anger response)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

WQhat is assertion

A

In short, in life, as in a football game, the principle
to follow is: Hit the line hard; don’t foul and don’t
shirk, but hit the line hard!”

Theodore Roosevelt, The Strenuous Life (1900)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is assertive behaviour

A

Involves legitimate use of physical or verbal force to

achieve purpose without the intention to harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hostile aggression characteristics

A
  1. Intent to harm
  2. Goal to harm
  3. Unusual effort and
    energy expenditure
    (anger present)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Instrumental aggression characteristics

A
  1. Intent to harm
  2. Goal to win
  3. No anger
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Instinct theory - who and what is it?

A

(Freud, 1950; Gill, 1966)

Human have innate instinct to be aggressive. Sport is a context to release “pent-up” aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Social learning theory - who and what?

A

Learning as a vicarious process through modelling/ imitation

17
Q

Frustration hypothesis - who and what?

A

(Dollard et al., 1939)
Aggression that results from anger
when frustrated. Aggression
provides a cathartic effect

18
Q

Reformulated Frustration hypothesis

A

Berkowitz (1965, 1993):
- Provides interactional model between social learning and
frustration hypothesis
- Frustration does not always lead to aggression but
increases the likelihood via arousal and anger
- Aggression only results if deemed acceptable via socially
learning cues (e.g., moral atmosphere, significant others)

frustration - increased arousal - appropriateness of action - aggression

19
Q

motivation - task goal orientations

A

success is defined in terms of self-referenced
criteria, such as mastery and
improvement.

20
Q

motivation - ego goal orientations

A

success is defined in terms of other-referenced
criteria, such as being superior or outperforming
others

21
Q

motivation - mastery climate

A

skill mastery and improvement is emphasised where
effort is praised and mistakes are
seen as part of learning

22
Q

motivation - performance climate

A

normative comparisons between group members
is emphasised where superiority is
praised.

23
Q

How is motivation linked with moral

behaviour in sport?

A
Ego orientation
Task orientation  
            //
antisocial behaviour 
            ^^
performance climate

Task orientation» Pro social behaviour <

24
Q

Implications for controlling antisocial

behaviour

A

Moral education/ modelling of good sportspersonship
 Emphasis on mastery climate
 Performance climate not emphasises at the expense of
mastery climate
 Emotion control strategies (e.g., relaxation, cognitive
techniques)