Moral & Prosocial Development (12) Flashcards

1
Q

altruistic motives

A

empathy and sympathy for others, at later ages consistently acting on personal moral principles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Empathy vs Sympathy

A

Empathy: emotional reaction to another’s emotions that is similar
Sympathy: feeling of concern for another in reaction to another’s emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Nancy Eisenberg’s and prosocial behaviour

A

Prosocial moral dilemmas used to determine prosocial behaviour (choose between helping someone and meeting their own needs)
5 stages of prosocial moral reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Eisenberg Level 1

A

Hedonistic, self focused orientation

  • preschool age
  • concerned with own interests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Eisenberg level 2

A

Needs-based orientation

  • some preschool, elementary school age
  • concerned with others’ needs even when they conflict with own needs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Eisenberg level 3

A

Approval and/or stereotyped orientation

  • elementary school
  • decisions based on ideas of good vs bad
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Eisenberg lever 4

A

a) Self-reflective empathic orientation
- older elementary and high school
- sympathetic responsiveness or role-taking
- concern for others’ humanness
b) Transitional level
- internalize values, norms, responsibilities
- concern for larger society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Eisenberg level 5

A

Strongly internalized stage

  • everything based on values, norms, responsibilities
  • belief in dignity & equality of all individuals
  • desire to maintain obligations and improve society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Factors that affect prosocial behaviour

A

rewards decrease motivation for prosocial behaviour
punishment = prosocial behaviour to avoid punishment
physical punishment, authoritarian parenting = decreased sympathy
discipline with reasoning increases voluntary prosocial behaviour
(environment) parents values, toward whom they are prosocial
Media, Culture, Opportunities/practicing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What factors increase prosocial behaviour?

A

supportive and constructive parenting
discipline with reasoning and perspective taking
prosocial activities, opportunities to experience emotional rewards
School-based interventions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What might account for differences in prosocial behaviour? Bio/Psycho/Social

A

Bio: genetic factors - temperament
Psycho: emotion regulation
Social: parents, teachers, peers, oppertunities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does Nancy Heisenberg say in the video

A

emotion regulation how that impacts peer relations, teacher reports, prosocial behaviour,
predicts social competency
cognitive skills to deal with and control emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Summarize Piaget and moral reasoning

A

through observation and interviews Piaget described changes from rigid acceptance of rule to understanding moral rules are a product of social interaction
2 stages of moral development and a transition period (3 stages) from outcome > intention to intention > outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Piaget moral reasoning stage 1

A

Morality of constraint (heteronomous morality)
< 7yrs
-moral reasoning before concrete operational
-rules unchangeable, established by adults
-outcome/consequence > motive/intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Piaget moral reasoning stage 2

A

Transitional period

  • ages 7-10
  • increased peer interaction leads to understanding that rules can be constructed by a group
  • learning to take others perspectives leads to change in thinking about moral issues
  • start to value fairness and equality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Piaget moral reasoning stage 3

A

Autonomous morality

  • by age 11 or 12
  • understand rules can be changed if a group agrees
  • fairness and equality among people
  • punishment should fit the crime,
  • can consider motives and intentions in behaviour
17
Q

Criticism of Piaget’s moral reasoning

A

timeline, young children can sometimes recognize intention (hurting)
sometimes disregard adults views
peer interaction doesn’t lead to moral development, cooperation does

18
Q

Summarize Kohlberg’s theory of moral reasoning

A

discontinuous series of stages that are hierarchacal
3 levels of reasoning, 2 stages (6)
presented children with moral dilemmas and questions them about issues in moral judgements and how they made them
not everyone attains stage 6

19
Q

Summarize Kohlberg’s 3 levels of moral reasoning

A

Preconventional - self centered, focus on rewards and avoiding punishment
Conventional - centered on social relationships, compliance with duties/laws
Postconventional - reasoning involves ideals, moral principles and universal rights

20
Q

Kohlberg moral reasoning stage 1

A

Preconventional

  1. punishment & obedience orientation
    - does not consider/recognize interests of others
    - what is right is obedience to authorities
21
Q

Kohlberg moral reasoning stage 2

A

Preconventional

  1. instrumental & exchange orientation
    - what is in one’s own best interest of involves an exchange for benefits
22
Q

Kohlberg moral reasoning stage 3

A

Conventional

  1. mutual interpersonal expectations, relationships & interpersonal conformity orientation
    - does what is expected by people or in a given role
    - being “good” is important (good motives, care for others and good relationships)
23
Q

Kohlberg moral reasoning stage 4

A

Conventional

  1. social system & conscience orientation (law & order)
    - focus on fulfilling duties, upholding laws, contributing to society
    - motivated to keep social system and avoid breakdown
24
Q

Kohlberg moral reasoning stage 5

A

Postconventional

  1. social contract or individual rights orientation
    - focus on upholding rules that are in the best interest of the group or agreed upon rules
    - universal rights must be upheld regardless
25
Q

Kohlberg moral reasoning stage 6

A

Postconventional

  1. universal ethical problems
    - committed to self chosen principles that reflect universal rights
    - act according to universal rights rather than laws
26
Q

criticisms of Kohlberg’s theory of moral reasoning

A
  • reflects western concepts
  • discontinuity
  • sex differences, principles of justice and rights valued by men more than women
27
Q

conscience

A

internal regulatory mechanism that increases conformity to standards of conduct in a culture

28
Q

What did Warneken & Tomasello (2009) want to find out?

A

are people naturally helpful (and society corrupts) or naturally selfish (and society teaches)?
comparisons between chimps and young children

29
Q

What were the three forms of altruism that Warneken & Tomasello (2009) identified and what are the differences between children and chimps?

A

Helping - both help in situations where they understand the goal
Sharing - chimps don’t share, children do (social cognitive deficits? evolution?)
Informing - chimps communicate for self serving purposes, infants give helpful information

30
Q

What did Warneken & Tomasello (2009) conclude?

A

children are naturally helpful (like primates), generous and informative
altruism is not a single trait
culture mediates altruistic tendencies, social experiences motivate altruistic tendencies