Moral & Prosocial Development (12) Flashcards

1
Q

altruistic motives

A

empathy and sympathy for others, at later ages consistently acting on personal moral principles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Empathy vs Sympathy

A

Empathy: emotional reaction to another’s emotions that is similar
Sympathy: feeling of concern for another in reaction to another’s emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Nancy Eisenberg’s and prosocial behaviour

A

Prosocial moral dilemmas used to determine prosocial behaviour (choose between helping someone and meeting their own needs)
5 stages of prosocial moral reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Eisenberg Level 1

A

Hedonistic, self focused orientation

  • preschool age
  • concerned with own interests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Eisenberg level 2

A

Needs-based orientation

  • some preschool, elementary school age
  • concerned with others’ needs even when they conflict with own needs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Eisenberg level 3

A

Approval and/or stereotyped orientation

  • elementary school
  • decisions based on ideas of good vs bad
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Eisenberg lever 4

A

a) Self-reflective empathic orientation
- older elementary and high school
- sympathetic responsiveness or role-taking
- concern for others’ humanness
b) Transitional level
- internalize values, norms, responsibilities
- concern for larger society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Eisenberg level 5

A

Strongly internalized stage

  • everything based on values, norms, responsibilities
  • belief in dignity & equality of all individuals
  • desire to maintain obligations and improve society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Factors that affect prosocial behaviour

A

rewards decrease motivation for prosocial behaviour
punishment = prosocial behaviour to avoid punishment
physical punishment, authoritarian parenting = decreased sympathy
discipline with reasoning increases voluntary prosocial behaviour
(environment) parents values, toward whom they are prosocial
Media, Culture, Opportunities/practicing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What factors increase prosocial behaviour?

A

supportive and constructive parenting
discipline with reasoning and perspective taking
prosocial activities, opportunities to experience emotional rewards
School-based interventions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What might account for differences in prosocial behaviour? Bio/Psycho/Social

A

Bio: genetic factors - temperament
Psycho: emotion regulation
Social: parents, teachers, peers, oppertunities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does Nancy Heisenberg say in the video

A

emotion regulation how that impacts peer relations, teacher reports, prosocial behaviour,
predicts social competency
cognitive skills to deal with and control emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Summarize Piaget and moral reasoning

A

through observation and interviews Piaget described changes from rigid acceptance of rule to understanding moral rules are a product of social interaction
2 stages of moral development and a transition period (3 stages) from outcome > intention to intention > outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Piaget moral reasoning stage 1

A

Morality of constraint (heteronomous morality)
< 7yrs
-moral reasoning before concrete operational
-rules unchangeable, established by adults
-outcome/consequence > motive/intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Piaget moral reasoning stage 2

A

Transitional period

  • ages 7-10
  • increased peer interaction leads to understanding that rules can be constructed by a group
  • learning to take others perspectives leads to change in thinking about moral issues
  • start to value fairness and equality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Piaget moral reasoning stage 3

A

Autonomous morality

  • by age 11 or 12
  • understand rules can be changed if a group agrees
  • fairness and equality among people
  • punishment should fit the crime,
  • can consider motives and intentions in behaviour
17
Q

Criticism of Piaget’s moral reasoning

A

timeline, young children can sometimes recognize intention (hurting)
sometimes disregard adults views
peer interaction doesn’t lead to moral development, cooperation does

18
Q

Summarize Kohlberg’s theory of moral reasoning

A

discontinuous series of stages that are hierarchacal
3 levels of reasoning, 2 stages (6)
presented children with moral dilemmas and questions them about issues in moral judgements and how they made them
not everyone attains stage 6

19
Q

Summarize Kohlberg’s 3 levels of moral reasoning

A

Preconventional - self centered, focus on rewards and avoiding punishment
Conventional - centered on social relationships, compliance with duties/laws
Postconventional - reasoning involves ideals, moral principles and universal rights

20
Q

Kohlberg moral reasoning stage 1

A

Preconventional

  1. punishment & obedience orientation
    - does not consider/recognize interests of others
    - what is right is obedience to authorities
21
Q

Kohlberg moral reasoning stage 2

A

Preconventional

  1. instrumental & exchange orientation
    - what is in one’s own best interest of involves an exchange for benefits
22
Q

Kohlberg moral reasoning stage 3

A

Conventional

  1. mutual interpersonal expectations, relationships & interpersonal conformity orientation
    - does what is expected by people or in a given role
    - being “good” is important (good motives, care for others and good relationships)
23
Q

Kohlberg moral reasoning stage 4

A

Conventional

  1. social system & conscience orientation (law & order)
    - focus on fulfilling duties, upholding laws, contributing to society
    - motivated to keep social system and avoid breakdown
24
Q

Kohlberg moral reasoning stage 5

A

Postconventional

  1. social contract or individual rights orientation
    - focus on upholding rules that are in the best interest of the group or agreed upon rules
    - universal rights must be upheld regardless
25
Kohlberg moral reasoning stage 6
Postconventional 6. universal ethical problems - committed to self chosen principles that reflect universal rights - act according to universal rights rather than laws
26
criticisms of Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning
- reflects western concepts - discontinuity - sex differences, principles of justice and rights valued by men more than women
27
conscience
internal regulatory mechanism that increases conformity to standards of conduct in a culture
28
What did Warneken & Tomasello (2009) want to find out?
are people naturally helpful (and society corrupts) or naturally selfish (and society teaches)? comparisons between chimps and young children
29
What were the three forms of altruism that Warneken & Tomasello (2009) identified and what are the differences between children and chimps?
Helping - both help in situations where they understand the goal Sharing - chimps don't share, children do (social cognitive deficits? evolution?) Informing - chimps communicate for self serving purposes, infants give helpful information
30
What did Warneken & Tomasello (2009) conclude?
children are naturally helpful (like primates), generous and informative altruism is not a single trait culture mediates altruistic tendencies, social experiences motivate altruistic tendencies