Moral Development Flashcards
1
Q
What is moral judgment?
A
- judgments about how people should interact with each other
- made based on principles concerning the distinction between right/wrong
- justice
- welfare
- fairness
2
Q
What is Piaget’s theory of moral reasoning?
A
- development of moral judgment relies on cognitive development
- increasingly able to take intentions into account
- children pass through 3 qualitatively different stages of moral development
- order is fixed and universal
- assessed moral judgment with stories
- interested in explanation for why an action is viewed as right or wrong
3
Q
What are the 3 stages in Piaget’s theory of moral reasoning?
A
- premoral stage
- heteronomous stage
- autonomous stage
4
Q
What is the premoral stage?
A
- 0-5 years
- little understanding of rules so can’t make judgments about right and wrong
- behaviour is regulated by caregivers
5
Q
What is the heteronomous stage?
A
- 5-10 years
- rules are fixed and can never be broken
- morality = obeying the rules of authority figures, like parents
- outcome of an action is more important than the intention
6
Q
What is the autonomous stage?
A
- 10 + years
- rules are not absolute and can be changed
- consider moral principles, like fairness, when deciding what is right and wrong
- intentions matter
7
Q
What is Kohlberg’s theory of moral reasoning?
A
- three stages of moral reasoning
- used the Heinz dilemma and assessed the reasoning of the answer to determine which stage a child is in
8
Q
What are the 3 stages in Kohlberg’s theory of moral reasoning?
A
- pre conventional
- conventional
- post conventional
9
Q
What is the pre conventional stage?
A
- 3-7 years
- focus on avoiding punishment and getting rewards from authority figures
- self-interest
- intentions don’t matter
- no personal sense of right and wrong
- rules are fixed and absolute
- only the outcome matters
10
Q
What is the conventional stage?
A
- 8-13 years
- moral reasoning based on external ethics
- good boy attitude
- low and order morality
- focus on compliance with social expectations, conventions, and duties
- good behaviour is what is approved of by the social group and maintaining good social relationships
- capable of considering intentions
- good behaviour os upholding one’s duty to follow the rules and laws of society
11
Q
What is the post conventional stage?
A
- 13 + years, but not everyone reaches this stage
- moral reasoning based on personal ethics
- social contract
- principle
- morality of an action is judged based on what’s in the best interest of society or based on maintaining universal ethical principles; life, liberty, basic human rights
- rules are viewed as social contract that can be changed to meet the needs of society
- people may disobey rules that are inconsistent with their moral principles
- rules are viewed as useful but not absolute
12
Q
What were Piaget and Kohlberg’s contributions?
A
- first to acknowledge that moral reasoning changes systematically as children grow older due to cognitive development
- recognized that children are increasingly able to take intentions into account as they age
13
Q
What are weaknesses of Piaget and Kohlberg’s theories?
A
- assumed that infants and very young children are incapable of judgments about right and wrong (underestimated kids)
- underestimated children’s ability to appreciate the importance of intentions
- children and adults show inconsistencies in their moral reasoning; people often reason at different levels on different occasions and more likely to reason at lower levels if can personally benefit
14
Q
Is moral judgment innate or learned?
A
- a study with babies (helper vs hinderer) suggests that rudimentary moral judgment is innate
15
Q
Can infants appreciate intentions?
A
- 2 year olds can
- most of them chose to help the adult with positive intentions in a study; evidence of selective helping and contrary to Piaget’s theory
- in another study they helped both adults equally when they both had positive intentions
- children who fail false belief tasks are more likely to ignore intentions when making moral judgments