Module 4 – Markets Flashcards
Here we have the graph of the market for recent law school graduates from 4.1.2
Imagine there are currently 80,000 lawyers in the market. Approximately what is the short-run equilibrium salary paid to lawyers?
- $280,000
- $160,000
- $100,000
- $30,000
$280,000
At a price of $280,000, firms would demand less than 10,000 lawyers. This would result in many unemployed lawyers which would not be an equilibrium result in the short-run.
$160,000
At a price of $160,000, firms would demand 50,000 lawyers. This would result in 30,000 unemployed lawyers which would not be an equilibrium result in the short-run.
$100,000
At a price of $100,000, firms demand 80,000 lawyers. This answer can be found by looking at the 80,000 mark on the quantity axis and then moving up to where the demand curve “intersects” the 80,000 quantity mark. In the short-run, the supply curve can be thought of as a straight vertical line at 80,000.
$30,000
At a price of $30,000, firms would demand more than 100,000 lawyers. This would result in an excess demand of over 20,000 lawyers which would not be an equilibrium result in the short-run.
In the previous example, what will happen to the market for recent law school graduates in the long-run?
Here is the graph again for reference:
- Less students will enter law school and thus the quantity of lawyers will decrease in the long-run.
- Firms will eventually raise salaries to the point where 80,000 students are willing to enter law school.
- Since the market is in short-run equilibrium, neither salaries nor the quantity of lawyers will change.
Less students will enter law school and thus the quantity of lawyers will decrease in the long-run.
In order for there to be 80,000 lawyers in equilibrium, firms would have to be willing to pay $280,000 salaries which they are not willing to do. Thus there is an excess supply of lawyers and the number of students entering law school will decrease.
Firms will eventually raise salaries to the point where 80,000 students are willing to enter law school.
See correct answer for explanation.
Since the market is in short-run equilibrium, neither salaries nor the quantity of lawyers will change.
In the short-run, law school graduates cannot leave the work force due to lower salaries. Potential students however can choose to not enter law school and as a result in the future there will be less law school graduates.
Here we again have the graph of the market for lawyers from 4.1.2
From the last question we know that the number of students entering law school will decrease from 80,000. Given that there are 80,000 new law student graduates in the market, approximately how many new students will enter law school this year (round to the nearest 5,000)?
Number:
30,000
Currently there are 80,000 new law school graduates, resulting in a wage of $100,000. At this wage, only 35,000 new law school graduates are supplied. In this example, that means that only 35,000 prospective law students will enter law school.
Which of the following is likely to increase unemployment the most?
- A law implements a minimum wage under the market equilibrium wage and the labor supply is elastic.
- A law implements a minimum wage under the market equilibrium wage and the labor supply is inelastic.
- A law implements a minimum wage above the market equilibrium wage and the labor supply is elastic.
- A law implements a minimum wage above the market equilibrium wage and the labor supply is inelastic.
A law implements a minimum wage under the market equilibrium wage and the labor supply is elastic.
A minimum wage is a price floor which limits how low a price can be charged. Setting a price floor under the equilibrium wage will have no impact on the market regardless of the elasticity of the labor supply.
A law implements a minimum wage under the market equilibrium wage and the labor supply is inelastic.
A minimum wage is a price floor which limits how low a price can be charged. Setting a price floor under the equilibrium wage will have no impact on the market regardless of the elasticity of the labor supply.
A law implements a minimum wage above the market equilibrium wage and the labor supply is elastic.
An elastic supply of labor means that an increase in wages will result in a larger increase in the number of hours employees want to work. This would make a price floor (minimum wage) more likely to lead to a surplus of labor and unemployment.
A law implements a minimum wage above the market equilibrium wage and the labor supply is inelastic.
An inelastic supply of labor means that an increase in wages will result in a smaller increase in the number of hours employees want to work. Thus the minimum wage will increase unemployment, but not as much as it would have if the labor supply was elastic.
The graph below depicts a price floor on the sale of electrician services. Which region or regions represent producer revenues?
- Producer revenues are given by D + E + F.
- Producer revenues are given by A.
- Producer revenues are given by B + C + D + E.
- Producer revenues are given by B + D + E + F.
Producer revenues are given by D + E + F.
D, E, and F are all part of revenues, but not all of it. B is also revenue earned by electricians.
Producer revenues are given by A.
A represents consumer surplus and is not a part of revenues.
Producer revenues are given by B + C + D + E.
C is part of deadweight loss and represents lost surplus due to the market intervention. It is not a part of revenues.
Producer revenues are given by B + D + E + F.
The revenue earned can be calculated by multiplying the quantity sold by the price, which in this case gives the tall rectangle made by B + D + E + F. The height of the rectangle represents the price, and the width of the rectangle represents the quantity sold.
Consumers bear more of the incidence of a tax when supply is:
- more elastic.
- less elastic.
more elastic.
When the supply curve is less steep, or more elastic, firms are more sensitive to the price change caused by the tax, and as a result are able to adjust quantity supplied accordingly. Thus firms will end up “paying” a smaller portion of the tax and consumers will bear more of the incidence of the tax.
less elastic.
When the supply curve is steeper, or less elastic, firms are less sensitive to the price change caused by the tax, and are not as able to adjust quantity supplied accordingly. Thus firms will end up “paying” a greater portion of the tax and consumers will bear less of the incidence of the tax.
Firms bear more of the incidence of a tax when demand is:
- more elastic
- less elastic
more elastic.
When the demand curve is less steep, or more elastic, consumers are more sensitive to the price change caused by the tax, and as a result are able to adjust quantity demanded accordingly. Thus consumers will end up “paying” a smaller portion of the tax and firms will bear more of the incidence of the tax.
less elastic.
When the demand curve is steeper, or less elastic, consumers are less sensitive to the price change caused by the tax, and are not as able to adjust quantity demanded accordingly. Thus consumers will end up “paying” a greater portion of the tax and firms will bear less of the incidence of the tax.
A university is hoping to limit the amount of junk food that is consumed by students at the university food halls. The university is considering putting a tax on junk food. Which of the following taxes will be the most efficient at limiting the amount of junk food consumed?
- A tax imposed on the students
- A tax imposed on the vendors selling the food
- The impact of the tax will be the same regardless of whom the tax is imposed on.
- The tax will not decrease consumption of junk food
A tax imposed on the students
See correct answer for explanation.
A tax imposed on the vendors selling the food
See correct answer for explanation.
The impact of the tax will be the same regardless of whom the tax is imposed on.
The impact of the tax does not depend on whom it is imposed on because in either case, the price will change and students and the vendors will adjust their quantity demanded and supplied accordingly. The magnitude of the reduction depends solely on the price elasticity of demand and supply.
The tax will not decrease consumption of junk food
See correct answer for explanation.
Consider the market for print encyclopedias. In the last 10 years, the cost of producing encyclopedias has decreased substantially due to lower printing and information acquisition costs. At the same time, more and more people have started using the internet as their primary source of information. What can we infer about the change in the price and quantity in the encyclopedia market over the last 10 years?
- Price and quantity have decreased.
- Price has increased and quantity has decreased.
- Price has decreased and the effect on quantity cannot be determined
- Price has increased and the effect on quantity cannot be determined.
Price and quantity have decreased.
See correct answer for explanation.
Price has increased and quantity has decreased.
See correct answer for explanation.
Price has decreased and the effect on quantity cannot be determined
With a greater number of alternative sources of information, demand for encyclopedias will decrease. This fall in demand will result in both lower prices and quantity. At the same time, the supply of encyclopedias will increase due to lower costs. This lowers the price and increases quantity. Thus, we can only say for certain that price decreases. The overall change in quantity will be determined by the relative magnitudes of the two effects.
Price has increased and the effect on quantity cannot be determined.
See correct answer for explanation.
Consider the market for chocolate bars. A major chocolate company is trying to project their revenue for the upcoming year. Due to excellent predicted weather conditions, the cost of cocoa, a key ingredient in chocolate, will decrease for next year. At the same time, a popular magazine has started promoting the health benefits of chocolate. Just from this information, what can the company know about next year’s revenue?
- Revenues will increase from the current year.
- Revenues will decrease from the current year.
- Revenues will be unchanged from the current year.
- The impact on revenues cannot be determined.
Revenues will increase from the current year.
See correct answer for explanation.
Revenues will decrease from the current year.
See correct answer for explanation.
Revenues will be unchanged from the current year.
See correct answer for explanation.
The impact on revenues cannot be determined.
Due to the increased demand, prices and quantity increase. Due to the increased supply, prices decreases and quantity increases. Thus quantity increases but the impact on price cannot be determined. Revenue is equal to price multiplied by quantity. As a result, the effect on revenue cannot be determined.
Computer prices in the last year have gone down due to technological advancements. At the same time, there has been a large decrease in the supply of new software developers, raising the costs of producing computer software. What will be the impact on the equilibrium price and quantity of computer software?
- The price and quantity will increase.
- The price will increase and quantity will decrease.
- The price will increase and the impact on quantity cannot be determined.
- The impact on price cannot be determined and quantity will decrease.
The price and quantity will increase.
See correct answer for explanation.
The price will increase and quantity will decrease.
See correct answer for explanation.
The price will increase and the impact on quantity cannot be determined.
Computers and computer software are complements. As a result of the fall in computer prices, demand for computer software will increase. The increased demand will cause both prices and quantity to rise. At the same time, the supply of software will fall due to the higher costs. This raises the price of software and causes quantity to fall. Thus we can only say for certain that price increases. The overall change in quantity will be determined by the relative magnitudes of the two shifts.
The impact on price cannot be determined and quantity will decrease.
See correct answer for explanation.
The cost of rare earth metals used in electronics is steadily rising due to the increasing difficulty of mining them as they become scarcer. At the same time, laptops, tablets, and smartphones are becoming increasingly popular as substitutes to desktop computers. What impact will these two events have on the equilibrium price and quantity of desktop computers?
- The price and quantity will decrease.
- The price will decrease and quantity will increase.
- The price will increase and quantity will decrease.
- The impact on price cannot be determined and the quantity will decrease.
The price and quantity will decrease.
See correct answer for explanation.
The price will decrease and quantity will increase.
See correct answer for explanation.
The price will increase and quantity will decrease.
See correct answer for explanation.
The impact on price cannot be determined and the quantity will decrease.
Higher costs will decrease the supply of desktop computers. This fall in supply causes quantity to fall and prices to rise. The greater prevalence of substitutes for desktop computers will decrease demand. This also causes quantity to fall, but lowers prices. Thus we can only say for certain that quantity decreases. The direction of price will be determined by the relative magnitude of the previous two shifts.
Assume that there are 150 firms, each of which gains a different benefit from polluting. Each firm is allocated one pollution permit by the government, and it can either use it or trade it for money in the market. Suppose the demand and supply curves for permits look like the following:
The market equilibrium is at a price of $11,500 and 115 permits sold. What does this market equilibrium say about firms’ willingness to pay to be able to pollute? Select all that apply.
- That most firms are not willing to pay $11,500 for one pollution permit.
- That no firm has more than half of the permits.
- That some firms are willing to pay more than $11,500 for one pollution permit.
- That no firm is willing to pay over $15,000 for one pollution permit.
That most firms are not willing to pay $11,500 for one pollution permit.
115 firms sell their permits, thus all of those firms are not willing to pay $11,500 for the right to pollute, or they would buy back their permit at that price. 115 is more than half of the total number of firms (150).
That no firm has more than half of the permits.
Since 115 permits were sold, that means that 35 firms bought those 115 permits. It is possible that one firm bought 100 of those 115 permits, giving that firm more than half of the total permits.
That some firms are willing to pay more than $11,500 for one pollution permit.
The demand curve shows us that some permits are demanded at prices higher than $11,500. For example, 100 permits are demanded at a price of $12,500.
That no firm is willing to pay over $15,000 for one pollution permit.
At a price of $15,000 and higher, all firms are willing to sell their permit. Thus none of those firms would be willing to buy back that permit at a price higher than $15,000.
A local government implements a price ceiling of $4/gallon on milk. If the equilibrium price is $3 what will be the effect on the market for milk?
- There will be a shortage of milk.
- There will be a surplus of milk.
- There will be no effect on the market for milk.
There will be a shortage of milk.
See correct answer for explanation.
There will be a surplus of milk.
See correct answer for explanation.
There will be no effect on the market for milk.
A price ceiling limits how high a price can be charged. Setting a price ceiling above the equilibrium price will have no impact on the market, since the equilibrium price already conforms to the law.
The graph below depicts a price ceiling limiting the hourly rate that can be charged by electricians. Which region or regions on the graph represent deadweight loss and the revenue earned by electricians?
- B is the revenue earned by electricians and C is the deadweight loss.
- D + E is the revenue earned by electricians and C is the deadweight loss.
- D + E is the revenue earned by electricians and F is the deadweight loss.
- D + E + F is the revenue earned by electricians and C is the deadweight loss.
B is the revenue earned by electricians and C is the deadweight loss.
C is the deadweight loss, but B is not revenue earned by the electricians.
D + E is the revenue earned by electricians and C is the deadweight loss.
D and E are both part of the revenue earned by electricians, but not all of it. F is also revenue earned by electricians. C is the deadweight loss.
D + E is the revenue earned by electricians and F is the deadweight loss.
D and E are both part of the revenue earned by electricians, but not all of it. F is also revenue earned by electricians, not deadweight loss.
D + E + F is the revenue earned by electricians and C is the deadweight loss.
The revenue electricians earn can be calculated by multiplying the quantity sold by price, which in this case gives the rectangle made by D + E + F. C is the deadweight loss because it represents the surplus (WTP - WTS) from additional transactions that would take place in equilibrium, but do not occur under the price ceiling.
How is consumer surplus calculated and which region or regions on the graph below represent consumer surplus?
- Consumer surplus is the difference between the WTP of the consumer and the price paid by the consumer for every item sold. It is represented by A + B + C.
- Consumer surplus is the difference between the WTP of the consumer and the price paid by the consumer for every item sold. It is represented by A + B.
- Consumer surplus is the difference between the WTP of the consumer and the WTS of the producer for every item sold. It is represented by A + B + D.
- Consumer surplus is the difference between the WTP of the consumer and the WTS of the producer for every item sold. It is represented by A + B + C + D.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the WTP of the consumer and the price paid by the consumer for every item sold. It is represented by A + B + C.
C is deadweight loss and represents surplus that would have been created in equilibrium but was not due to the price ceiling.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the WTP of the consumer and the price paid by the consumer for every item sold. It is represented by A + B.
A + B represents the area between the demand curve (WTP) and the price ceiling (price) for all items sold. This is consumer surplus.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the WTP of the consumer and the WTS of the producer for every item sold. It is represented by A + B + D.
The difference between the WTP of the consumer and the WTS of the producer for every item sold is total surplus. A + B + D represents total surplus here.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the WTP of the consumer and the WTS of the producer for every item sold. It is represented by A + B + C + D.
The difference between the WTP of the consumer and the WTS of the producer for every item sold is total surplus, not consumer surplus.