Module 3 – Suppliers and Cost Flashcards
Christine is a tax accountant in the United States. Due to the complexity of the U.S. tax code, many Americans often experience difficulties filing their taxes each year. Thus, in the past, Christine has made a large sum of money on the side offering her services during tax season. This year, however, a new computer software is being sold, designed to assist Americans with their taxes for a fraction of the cost that Christine has been charging her customers. At first glance, the software appears to be quite popular. What impact will this new software have on Christine’s profitability?
- The presence of the software will make Christine’s business less profitable.
- The presence of the software will make Christine’s business more profitable.
- The presence of the software will not affect Christine’s profitability.
- The impact on Christine’s profitability is unclear.
The presence of the software will make Christine’s business less profitable.
See correct answer for explanation.
The presence of the software will make Christine’s business more profitable.
See correct answer for explanation.
The presence of the software will not affect Christine’s profitability.
See correct answer for explanation.
The impact on Christine’s profitability is unclear.
It’s unclear how the presence of the software will affect Christine’s profitability. While the introduction of the software will almost surely force Christine to charge a lower price for her services to compete, Christine’s profitability also depends on her own costs. If Christine is able to use the service to improve her own productivity, her costs may also go down. If costs fall low enough, Christine may be able to maintain the same profitability or even improve her profitability if the software allows her to save time per customer and take on more customers.
A pool supply store is considering eliminating its physical locations and offering its products completely online. Which of the following costs would the store be able to eliminate from this transition? Select all that apply.
- The costs of rent and utilities from its physical shops
- The salaries of pool specialists responsible for assisting customers
- The costs of rubber used to produce pool floats
- The shelving costs needed to display its product offerings
- The costs of advertising the store brand and its products
The costs of rent and utilities from its physical shops
These costs would disappear once the store transitioned online.
The salaries of pool specialists responsible for assisting customers
While salaries are fixed costs, it’s not clear that the store would be able to eliminate these costs from its business model.
The costs of rubber used to produce pool floats
This cost depends only on whether the store continues to produce pool floats, a decision which is not affected by the transition online.
The shelving costs needed to display its product offerings
These costs would disappear once the store transitioned online.
The costs of advertising the store brand and its products
These costs would not necessarily disappear and may even increase since the store no longer has its physical stores to provide visibility.
Al’s Autos, a car rental company, spends $2.1 million per year on car purchases, routine maintenance and other fixed costs. The company rents out cars at an average rate of $100 per day, and incurs variable costs of $70 per day for each rental. In past years, the business has rented out 100,000 cars per year. However, the city in which the company is located has become a less popular tourist destination, causing consumers to travel there less frequently. The rental company anticipates that it will have 25% fewer customers in coming years. What should Al’s do?
- Definitely stay in business
- Decrease prices to $70 per day
- Exit the car rental industry
Definitely stay in business
Despite the large drop in rentals from 100,000 to 75,000, Al’s is still able to cover both variable and fixed costs. It should remain in business for the time being, unless it continues to lose customers to the point at which it can no longer cover its total yearly costs.
Decrease prices to $70 per day
At $70 per day, Al’s is just making enough money to cover variable costs. This will not be enough to cover his yearly costs.
Exit the car rental industry
Al’s should remain in business for the time being, unless it continues to lose customers to the point at which it can no longer cover its total yearly costs.
A manufacturing company has seen a decline in its physical sales over the past few years, leaving a portion of its fixed infrastructure underutilized. What are some reasonable measures the company could potentially take to maintain its profitability? Select all that apply.
- Try to cut fixed costs in other areas where possible
- Produce more of the product and save the excess supply as inventory until demand picks back up
- Advertise its offerings more to drive sales back up to its original level
- Rent out the underutilized space to other companies for additional revenues
- Recognize some of its revenue from pre-orders early
Try to cut fixed costs in other areas where possible
Cutting other fixed costs, such as salaries, could decrease costs enough so that the company is able to capture the same amount of value (profits).
Produce more of the product and save the excess supply as inventory until demand picks back up
This is a risky strategy. The decline in sales seems persistent, so there is no guarantee that demand will pick back up. Producing more, even temporarily, will increase total variable costs too—so profitability will decline even further.
Advertise its offerings more to drive sales back up to its original level
This is a risky strategy. The decline in sales seems persistent, so there is no guarantee that consumers will want the product despite increased advertising. Advertising will increase total costs too—so profitability will decline even further, even if sales do increase somewhat.
Rent out the underutilized space to other companies for additional revenues
This could help improve profitability as the space is not being utilized anyway. If demand does pick back up, the company could take back the space or rent out more space itself.
Recognize some of its revenue from pre-orders early
While this tactic could create the illusion of sustained profitability, actual profitability would continue to decline. It may decline even further if the company is fined for accounting fraud.
Is COST TO CONSTRUCT PARKING LOT a fixed or variable cost?
FIXED
Is CASHIER SALARIES a fixed or variable cost?
FIXED
Is BUILDING INSURACE a fixed or variable cost?
FIXED
Is COST OF PHYSICAL CHECKOUT COUNTERS a fixed or variable cost?
FIXED
Is HOURLY WAGES FOR BUTCHES AND BAKERS a fixed or variable cost?
VARIABLE
Is DELIVERY COSTS FOR ONLINE ORDERS a fixed or variable cost?
VARIABLE
Is ADVERTISING COSTS a fixed or variable cost?
FIXED
Is MAINTENANCE OF RISES AND ATTRACTIONS a fixed or variable cost?
FIXED
Is COST TO BUILD A FUN NEW HOUSE a fixed or variable cost?
FIXED
Is SALARIES OF LAWYERS a fixed or variable cost?
FIXED
Is COSTS OF FOOD AND DRINK a fixed or variable cost?
VARIABLE
Is HOURLY WAGES FOR CLOWNS AND CARTOON CHARACTERS a fixed or variable cost?
VARIABLE
The theme park from the previous question has finished building its fun house. The project cost $240,000 in total and requires two employees to operate it each day costing $50 per employee per day. The park estimates that approximately 400 guests will enter the fun house per day, each paying $1 to enter. After how many years will the theme park break even from operating the fun house?
- Within 1 year
- Between 1 and 2 years
- Between 2 and 3 years
- After 3 years
Within 1 year
See correct answer for explanation.
Between 1 and 2 years
See correct answer for explanation.
Between 2 and 3 years
The park makes $400 in revenues each day from guests and must pay $50*2=$100 to its employees each day as costs of operation. Profits per day are thus equal to $400-$100=$300. With these profits, it will take the park 800 days to recover the total amount it spent building the fun house.
After 3 years
See correct answer for explanation.
Suppose that you are the CEO of a national pizza chain. Your business has experienced increases in production costs over the past few years due to a continual increase in the price of cheese. When the price increases first started, your business was able to maintain its profitability by passing the higher costs on to consumers in the form of higher pizza prices. Now, however, your consumers are refusing to pay more for your product. One of your company’s executives suggests acquiring your supplier of cheese in order to control input costs. By doing so, she guarantees that your company will retain your customers and stop losing money. Should you take her advice?
- Yes– you should do anything to retain your customer base.
- No—in doing so, you may retain your customers, but you will still continue to lose money overall.
- No—customers will still continue to leave you even if you control price increases by buying the supplier.
Yes– you should do anything to retain your customer base.
This is not always true, especially if it is not profitable to operate anymore. See correct answer for explanation.
No—in doing so, you may retain your customers, but you will still continue to lose money overall.
Your colleague is forgetting to include opportunity costs in her reasoning. Even if you acquire the supplier, you will continue to lose money from an economic point of view. This is because you could have sold the cheese to others for a higher price than what you are receiving for it by putting it in your pizzas.
No—customers will still continue to leave you even if you control price increases by buying the supplier.
If your customers don’t experience further price increases, they will likely continue to buy your pizza, especially if competitors are forced to raise their own pizza prices. However, you will be losing money as a company, because you could have sold the cheese for more money.
Consider the following table:
The owner of Company B is considering starting a price war with Company A to eliminate a smaller competitor in its industry. Would it be a wise decision for Company B to enter a price war with Company A?
- No, because Company A has more flexibility to increase output and lower costs.
- Yes, because Company B’s cost structure allows it to lower prices further than Company A.
- No, because Company B cannot price low enough to force Company A to exit the industry.
- Yes, because Company B has greater market share than Company A.
No, because Company A has more flexibility to increase output and lower costs.
Variable cost-per-unit would remain the same even if Company A produced more, so this could not be the reason.
Yes, because Company B’s cost structure allows it to lower prices further than Company A.
This is not true.
No, because Company B cannot price low enough to force Company A to exit the industry.
It costs both firms $0.75 per unit. Thus, Company B cannot force A to leave the market by pricing lower than its variable cost-per-unit.
Yes, because Company B has greater market share than Company A.
In this case, market share should not matter in winning the price war.
A company books $100 million in revenue for fiscal year 2015, the most it has ever earned. However, the company earns a far lower profit than it did the previous year. What could explain this discrepancy?
- The company saw a decline in sales volume from the previous year.
- The company charged a higher price for its product in FY2015.
- The company saw the cost of its inputs increase substantially over the past year.
- The company created less value for its customers during the period.
The company saw a decline in sales volume from the previous year.
Even if sales volume did decline, the company still made $100 million in revenue, its most ever. The lower profits must be explained by higher costs.
The company charged a higher price for its product in FY2015.
Even if it did charge higher prices, the company still made $100 million in revenue, its most ever. The lower profits must be explained by higher costs.
The company saw the cost of its inputs increase substantially over the past year.
With higher revenues, lower profits can only be explained by higher costs.
The company created less value for its customers during the period.
This is not necessarily true. With lower profits, the company captured less value itself, but consumers could have captured the same or more value.