Module 2 Flashcards
The researchers who study the discipline of history place a high value on ________
critical thinking skills
Thinking or Reading Like a Historian: understanding and evaluating change and continuity over time
Thinking
Thinking or Reading Like a Historian: making appropriate historical evidence in answering questions
Thinking
Thinking or Reading Like a Historian: read between the lines and understand where a document came from
Reading
Thinking or Reading Like a Historian: developing coherent interpretations and arguments about how and why things happened
Thinking
It refers to how the origins of the historical documents affected its content
Quality
Refers to whether or not a historical document is trustworthy
Credibility
A historical skill that includes chronology, terms, and concepts
Comprehension
The timeline of the Historical Period of the Philippines
Pre-Colonial Period (1521-1565) => Colonial Period (1565- 1945) => Post-Colonial Period (1945 to present)
How many years did the Spanish colonize the Philippines?
333 years
True or False: When ordering time BC,
remember to count backward from 1.
True
When ordering time AD, remember to count ____ 1.
towards/ forwards to
Authors are bias-free and are never paid or forced to write in a way or ignore specific facts
False
Locate, compare, select, and use information from a range of sources as evidence.
By this stage, historians located and collected a variety of different sources and types of information. Now it is time to ________________ that you will use as evidence to support your hypothesis
compare and select the most relevant information
A ________ is one that will add to your understanding of a historical inquiry.
useful source
Something that can be proved: when an event took place, what happened and who was involved.
Fact
is based on what a person, or persons, may believe to be true.
Opinion
The purpose of [writing] descriptions is to ____________________
give clear information about people, places, objects at moments in time
The purpose of a historical explanation is to _____________
tell how or why something happened
In a historical argument, the researcher is presenting a hypothesis that can support with _________
primary and secondary sources
The researcher (student) writing in explanations and historical argument must be _____ and ________
clear, factual
The process of acknowledging historians, writers, or sources you have relied on for information and evidence
Referencing
True or False: Referencing is evidence that validates your argument.
True
True or False: Referencing is not evidence of effective research.
False
True or False: Referencing does not acknowledge the work of others.
False
The most standard referencing style being used
Chicago Manual of Style
Two of the most common referencing systems are:
1) Harvard method
2) Oxford method
documentary note referencing” or simply ‘footnoting
Oxford method
Where a section of your text uses quotes, ideas, or information from another source, a small superscript number (like this1) is added at the tail of the phrase, sentence, or paragraph.
If you have used more than one source, then multiple superscript numbers can be used (like this2). Each of these superscript numbers refers to a numbered citation, n at the bottom of the page
A referencing that uses in-text citations rather than superscript numbering.
Hardvard method
Harvard references are usually very brief, listing just the author’s surname and the date of publication. A page number is sometimes added when referring to a specific quote or piece of information. If the author’s surname is already mentioned within your writing, it does not need to be included within the parentheses. Full citations for each reference are then added to a reference list at the end of the text.
The edition of Chicago Manual Style that’s currently being followed
17th Edition
Historian/anthropologist who challenged the authenticity of the Code of Kalantiaw
William Henry Scott
