Models of human learning Flashcards
Contingency
relationships between two events
Statistical accounts
suggests that behaviour can be described in terms of relatively simple statistical computations representing contingency
Propositional account
beyond a normative analysis; provides an account based on reasoning and the formation of beliefs
Associative learning
hugely influential; describes learning as the formation of links between mental representation
What is cognitive science?
~ building formal computational models/programs of behaviour
~ stimulating behaviour
~ generating prediction
CS
cue/stimulus
US
outcome/event
Basic probabilities
~ need the probability of something happening + not happening with and w/o the cue to work out if it will happen
~ shown by calc. delta P
Delta P
Allan (1980) = P(O|C) - P(O|-C) = a/(a+b) - c/(c+d) Cue: a(+O) b(-O) w/o cue: c(+O) d(-O)
Chatlosh et al. ?
(1985)
~ press a key to make a light come one
~ different keys has different probabilities
~ operant/instrumental learning
Shanks et al.
(1995)
CS = colour of tank
US = whether it explodes or not
~ different conditions had different probabilities
~ terminal judgements reflect delta P
~ growth in judgements not consistent with delta P
~pavlovian learning
Evidence for delta P
~ Chatlosh et al. (1985)
~ Shanks et al. (1995)
~ both demonstrate human sensitivity o delta P
~ both demonstrate growth in sensitivity
~ shanks demonstrates outcome density effect
Shanks
(1991)
~ mr x eats a variety of fruits, some make him feel ill
~ some combos make him feel ill but how does he know which one in the combo it was?
~ conditional contingency = an interaction occurring between the cues
Cheng and Holyoak
(1995)
PROBABILISTIC CONTRAST MODEL
contingency should reflect the difference between delta P in the presence of other cues and delta P in the absence of other cues
Probabilistic contrast model
~ similar to the ∆P statistic, but computes contingency over a subset of trials in which the background cues are kept constant