Models of human learning Flashcards
(15 cards)
Contingency
relationships between two events
Statistical accounts
suggests that behaviour can be described in terms of relatively simple statistical computations representing contingency
Propositional account
beyond a normative analysis; provides an account based on reasoning and the formation of beliefs
Associative learning
hugely influential; describes learning as the formation of links between mental representation
What is cognitive science?
~ building formal computational models/programs of behaviour
~ stimulating behaviour
~ generating prediction
CS
cue/stimulus
US
outcome/event
Basic probabilities
~ need the probability of something happening + not happening with and w/o the cue to work out if it will happen
~ shown by calc. delta P
Delta P
Allan (1980) = P(O|C) - P(O|-C) = a/(a+b) - c/(c+d) Cue: a(+O) b(-O) w/o cue: c(+O) d(-O)
Chatlosh et al. ?
(1985)
~ press a key to make a light come one
~ different keys has different probabilities
~ operant/instrumental learning
Shanks et al.
(1995)
CS = colour of tank
US = whether it explodes or not
~ different conditions had different probabilities
~ terminal judgements reflect delta P
~ growth in judgements not consistent with delta P
~pavlovian learning
Evidence for delta P
~ Chatlosh et al. (1985)
~ Shanks et al. (1995)
~ both demonstrate human sensitivity o delta P
~ both demonstrate growth in sensitivity
~ shanks demonstrates outcome density effect
Shanks
(1991)
~ mr x eats a variety of fruits, some make him feel ill
~ some combos make him feel ill but how does he know which one in the combo it was?
~ conditional contingency = an interaction occurring between the cues
Cheng and Holyoak
(1995)
PROBABILISTIC CONTRAST MODEL
contingency should reflect the difference between delta P in the presence of other cues and delta P in the absence of other cues
Probabilistic contrast model
~ similar to the ∆P statistic, but computes contingency over a subset of trials in which the background cues are kept constant