Miller

Question 0

Why is ID a “science-stopper”? (Plantinga and Ruse)

Answer 0

ID is a paradigm and normal science fears that ID won’t need to discover.

Question 1

How does Miller say Behe’s argument is not traditional creationism?

Answer 1

Behe’s irreducible complexity makes Darwinian evolution impossible in principle, whereas traditional arguments rely on attacking gaps in intermediates, etc

Question 2

Miller on Behe’s logic

Answer 2

“Machines-> irreducibly complex
Therefore, those machines will not be evolutionarily feasible without even one bit.
Darwinian selection could not lead to such irreducibility.
ID”
Statement 3 is weak link, given that new research shows intermediates in eel sperm flagellum, protein pump, etc.