Milgram Variation Studies Flashcards
New baseline
Aim to investigate situational factors that affect obedience by altering Milgrams baseline studyAlso told Mr wallace had mild heart condition
Name all experiments
Rundown office blockTelephonic InstructionsOrdinary man
Rundown office block Experiment 10 aim
Test if study moved from university to rundown office block
Rundown office block findings
47.5% fully obedient
Conclusion rundown office block
Situational factors importantSetting reduced legitimacy
Experiment 7 telephonic instructions aim
Experimenter gave orders over the phone
Telephonic instructions findings
22.5% obeyedPretended to raise shock levelBecame obedient again when experimenter returned
Telephonic instructions conclusion
Physical presence of authority figure is important
Experiment 13 ordinary man gives orders procedure
2 confederates, one learner and experimenterExperimenter receives phone call and leaves, leaving confederate in chargeConfederate insists on giving increasing shocks
Experiment 13 ordinary man findings
80% refused to continue
Ordinary man conclusion
Orders must come from legitimate source
Strength of rundown office block
Milgram recorded dialogue between participantsModigliani and Rochat 1995, re-analysed informationFound earlier in procedure participant challenged experimenter, more likely to be defiantAllowed Modigliani and Rochat to gain deeper insight to what happened during holocaust
Telephonic instructions strength
Sedikides and Jackson 1990Zoo studyShowed when authority figure no longer present, obedience droppedMilgram’s findings on proximity generalise to more naturalistic situations, high external validity
Ordinary man weakness
Experimenter left ordinary man in chargeDerived some authority from experimenterSuggests obedience could be lower in situations where person giving orders is completely unrelated to any authority figure or institutional context