Mental Illness Flashcards
What 2 elements must be present for criminal guilt?
Actus reus- a wrongful deed (either physical or verbal)
Mens rea- criminal intent- has to believe beyond a reasonable doubt.
What is expected of individuals who are deemed fit to stand trial?
Expected to understand charges and proceedings to help in preparing their defence
What deems someone unfit to stand trial?
Inability to conduct a defence on any stage of the proceedings on the account of a mental disorder
What are some things we can do if someone is deemed unfit to stand trial?
Delay until a later date, give medication, evaluate mental state at a later time.
What was the example of Milton Dusky?
Had a bad family life and was abandoned at 16- worked multiple jobs, joined the Navy and was discharged due to anxiety and panic. Number of diagnoses including dependent personality and depression, fantasized about beating his ex-wife. At the age of 33 he sexually assaulted and kidnapped a 15 year old girl- understood his charges but claims she got in voluntarily. Defense lawyers claimed he wasn’t fit, judge overruled- sentenced to 45 years but was later brought down to 20.
What is the Dusky standard of deeming if someone is unfit to stand trial?
Has to have a current, present understanding of the charges and the ability to communicate these to a lawyer. Has to be an issue of capacity and not willingness. ASPD cannot be used- must also understand the specifics of the allegations as well as the consequences and basic legal proceedings.
What has it been determined that the jury should be told if the defendant is deemed unfit? (Fitness standard: R. v. Prichard)
1) Defendant must be mute of malice (intentionality)
2) Whether the defendant can plead to the indictment (direct the lawyer)
3) Cognitive complexity.
How does Bill C-30 determine if someone is unfit to stand trial?
Unfit to stand trial if unable to:
1) Understand nature or object of proceedings
2) Understand possible consequences
3) Communicate with counsel.
What is the best interest rule?
Requires the ability to make rational decisions that are beneficial to them.
What was the case of R. v. Taylor?
Taylor was a lawyer charged with aggravated assault and was deemed to suffer from paranoid schizophrenia. Deemed unfit as he thought the courts were conspiring against him and was not willing to act in his best interest- this was deemed to tough a criterion.
What was changed about fitness evals after Taylor’s case?
There used to be a five day limit for fitness evals and provisions- now the issue may be raised at various stages o the proceedings.
Who can assess fitness?
Only medical professionals- doesnt have to be a psychiatrist or have any forensic experience, as well as psychologists are generally excluded from court appointed assessments.
What are some instruments used to assess fitness?
Fitness Interview, Competency Screening Test (sentence completion), Competency to stand trial assessment instrument, interdisciplinary fitness interview, MacArthur competence assessment.
What are some instruments used to assess fitness?
Fitness Interview, Competency Screening Test (sentence completion), Competency to stand trial assessment instrument, interdisciplinary fitness interview, MacArthur competence assessment.
What are some characteristics of unfit defendants?
Single, unemployed, living alone, older females in minority groups, psychotic disorders as 8 times more likely to be found unfit.
What is the goal of the review board?
Individual assessment- what should we do with them? Have authority but not absolute authority.
What happens when there is a stay of proceedings?
Patient has a disposition to never be well enough to be fit (ex: IQ of 55 or severe brain injury) AND is deemed to not pose a threat to society.
What are the 3 steps when someone is found unfit to stand trial?
1) Proceedings are halted until fit (reassessed after 45 days)
2) Attempt to restore to fitness using medication
3) Court can stay proceedings- if court requests this then cannot decline.
What is insanity?
Not being sound of mind and being mentally deranged and irrational when they committed the offence. Removes responsibility of an act due to uncontrolled impulses and delusions.
What is the idea of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanty/ Not Criminally Responsible due to Mental Disorder?
When acts are impossible to control do not receive punishment according to US and Canadian Law- psychiatrists will assess mental state at the start of the crime.
What is the McNaughton test?
The original standard for insanity defence.
What is the outcome of an insanity defence?
Acquittal