[Memory] Topic 5 - Explanations for forgetting: Interference Flashcards
1
Q
What is Retroactive Interference?
A
Is where learning something new interferes with past learning
2
Q
What is Proactive interference?
A
When past learning interferes with current learning
3
Q
What did Múller and Pilzecker demonstrate?
A
- Múller and Pilzecker demonstrated retroactive interference by giving participants nonsense syllables to learn for 6 minutes and then after a retention interval, asking the participants to recall the lists.
- Participants were less good when given an intervening task
4
Q
What did Underwood find?
A
- Analysed the findings from a number of studies and found that participants were less able to learn a list of words later in a sequence in compassion to those shown earlier on
- Underwood found that if participants had to memorise ten or more lists of words then after 24 hours they were tested
5
Q
Evaluation 1: One criticism of research investigating interference is the artificial nature of the tasks
A
- One criticism of research investigating interference is the artificial nature of the tasks
- Most of the research investigating interference is laboratory based and uses artificial lists of words and or nonsense syllables
- Therefore the findings may not relate to everyday uses of memory which tend not to involve simple word lists
- This suggests that the results of interference research lack ecological validity and may not apply to everyday examples of human memory
6
Q
Evaluation 2: Another criticism of interference research is that it only explains some type of forgetting.
A
- Another criticism of interference research is that it only explains some type of forgetting.
- Critics argue that while interference effects do occur they do not occur very often
- For example rather than special conditions are required for interference to lead to forgetting the two memories need to be quite similar. This suggests that interference is a relatively unimportant explanation of everyday forgetting and other theories are required to provide a complete explanation