[Memory] Topic 5 - Explanations for forgetting: Interference Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is Retroactive Interference?

A

Is where learning something new interferes with past learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Proactive interference?

A

When past learning interferes with current learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Múller and Pilzecker demonstrate?

A
  • Múller and Pilzecker demonstrated retroactive interference by giving participants nonsense syllables to learn for 6 minutes and then after a retention interval, asking the participants to recall the lists.
  • Participants were less good when given an intervening task
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Underwood find?

A
  • Analysed the findings from a number of studies and found that participants were less able to learn a list of words later in a sequence in compassion to those shown earlier on
  • Underwood found that if participants had to memorise ten or more lists of words then after 24 hours they were tested
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evaluation 1: One criticism of research investigating interference is the artificial nature of the tasks

A
  • One criticism of research investigating interference is the artificial nature of the tasks
  • Most of the research investigating interference is laboratory based and uses artificial lists of words and or nonsense syllables
  • Therefore the findings may not relate to everyday uses of memory which tend not to involve simple word lists
  • This suggests that the results of interference research lack ecological validity and may not apply to everyday examples of human memory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Evaluation 2: Another criticism of interference research is that it only explains some type of forgetting.

A
  • Another criticism of interference research is that it only explains some type of forgetting.
  • Critics argue that while interference effects do occur they do not occur very often
  • For example rather than special conditions are required for interference to lead to forgetting the two memories need to be quite similar. This suggests that interference is a relatively unimportant explanation of everyday forgetting and other theories are required to provide a complete explanation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly