memory studies Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Baddeley - coding

A

4 groups
1. acoustically similar
2. acoustically dissimilar
3. semantically similar
4. semantically dissimilar
with STM recall ppts did worse on acoustically similar
with LTM recall ppts did worse on semantically similar - information coded semantically in LTM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Jacobs

A

research on capacity in STM
measured digit span i.e. read out 4 digits and ppt is asked to repeat then 5 etc…
found mean digit span was 9.3 and for letters 7.3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Miller

A

chunking in STM

observed things came in 7’s - suggested that capacity is 7 chunk (+/- 2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Peterson and Peterson

A

duration in STM
ppt given a trigram and a 3 digit number -told to count back from that number until told to stop after different retention intervals. Then had to repeat trigram back correctly
found correct responses decreased over time - duration in STM short unless we rehears it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bahrick

A
duration in LTM 
ages 17-74 
1. photo recognition 
2. free recall - of names in class 
1. within 15 years of graduation - 90% accurate 
    after 48 years declined to 70% 
2. within 15 years - 60% accurate 
     after 48 years declined to 30%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

HM case study

A

provides evidence for MSM
STM in tact and unaffected but LTM severely damaged - couldn’t form new memories
also evidence for different types of LTM - episodic poor but semantic and procedural okay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Clive Wearing case study

A

shows different types of LTM
hippocampus severely damaged
had poor episodic memory but procedural and semantic memory still in tact - could still play the piano

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

KF case study

A

Shallice and Warrington:
KF had amnesia found STM for digits was very poor when read aloud to him but better when he read them or himself
shows must be an area of STM that processes auditory information and one that processes visual information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Tulving et al

A

got ppts to perform various tasks when brains were scanned

found episodic and semantic memories recalled from prefrontal cortex - left - semantic and right - episodic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Baddeley - dual task performance

A

ppts had more difficulty doing two visual tasks than doing a visual and verbal task
evidence for visuo spatial sketchpad as both visual tasks competing for same slave system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

McGeoch and McDonald

A

retroactive inferences
6 groups all told to learn a list to 100% accuracy
then told to learn a new list
performance depended on nature of second list - worst recall was when words were most similar - synonyms
interference is strongest when memories are similar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Baddeley and Hitch

A

rugby players
asked to name the teams they had played in the season
didn’t depend on how log since first match but rather how many games they had played since

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Godden and Baddeley

A

context dependent forgetting
divers told to learn a word either in water or in land then to recall it in either the same environment or a different one
recall was 40% worse when environments didn’t match

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Carter and Cassaday

A

state dependent forgetting
learn on drugs or not and recall in the same state or different
significant worse when states didn’t match

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Loftus and Palmer

A

watched film clips of accidents
then asked to describe how fast the car was travelling with the use of different verbs e.g. collide or smashed mean was significantly less for the word contacted than smashed
also asked to come back a week later, pots who heard smash more likely to say yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Gabbert et al

A

ppts put into pairs both to watch the same crime from different angles - then allowed to discuss before individually do a recall test
71% of ppts mistakenly recalled something they would have not seen in their video

17
Q

Johnson and Scott

A

ppts waiting in a waiting room where they hear an argument and either see a man walk out with a pen and grease on his hand or a man with a bloody knife
49% recall with man with pen
33% recall with man with bloody knife
shows effect of tunnel theory - focus on the weapon

18
Q

Yuille and Cutshall

A

interview witnesses of real crime 4-5 months later
and asked to rate their stress during the event 1-10
recall was good for all witnesses but better for those who reported high anxiety

19
Q

Kohnken et al

A

meta analysis of 50 studies proved enhanced CI proved to be more affective than normal police interviews

20
Q

Sperling

A

studied capacity and duration in sensory memory
3 rows of 4 letters flashed for 0.1 seconds
in whole report condition had to recall as many words as they could - average 4-5 letters
in partial report condition had to recall a certain line - average 3-4 letters
shows: duration is very brief, disappears before it can be recalled
capacity is very large

21
Q

Morris

A

football fans recalled football facts better than non football fans suggests some coding is semantic.

22
Q

Aggleton and Waskett

A

recall on information about a museum was better when cued by smells

23
Q

Baker

A

higher recall when learning and recalling was done chewing gum