Memory - Effect Of Anxiet On Ewt Testing Flashcards
Argument 1
Anxiety has a negative effect on recall.
- leads to an increased arousal in the body, which can stop us form paying attention to important cues.
The weapon focus effect
If the crime is violent, then high anxiety and leves of arousal may focus attention on the central details of the attack
Johnson and Scott (1976)- weapon focus effect
- ppts in a waiting room overheard a heated discussion in the room next door.
Condition 1 : Man emerges holding ink stained pen (low anxiety) - 47 % of ppts could accurately identify this man
Condition 2: man emerges holding blood stained knife (high anxiety)- 36% of ppts accurately recalled this man
Argument 2
Anxiety has a positive effect on recall.
- the stress of witnesses going a crime or accident creates anxiety.
- the fight or flight response is triggered which increases our alertness and therefore improves our memory of the event because we are more aware of cues .
Yuille and cutshall (1986)
A group of 21 customers customers in a gun shop in Vancouver witness the owner of the shop shoot and kill a thief- they all gave statements to the police.
- 13 of these original witnesses were interviewed again 5 months later. The original statements were compared with the previous interviews for accuracy.
- they were also asked to rate how stressful they found the event (scale of 1-7)
Findings of yuille and Cutshall
High stress group = 87% accuracy
Low stress group = 75% accuracy
Yerkes- dodson law
Account for the two anxiety arguments using this law. , also called the inverted u - hypothesis
- states where anxiety is concerned, there is an optimum level where performance will be best.
A03- the inverted u-theory explanation is too simplistic
- anxiety is very difficult to define/ measure accurately as it is due to numerous elements, but the u theory only assumes physiological arousal is linked to poor performance.
- therefore the inverted u - theory is an incomplete explanation.
= lowering validity (reductionist)
A03- individual differences
KEY EXTRANEOUS VARIABLE
The effect of emotional sensitivity on anxiety.
Study by both well et al tested ppts labelled as either :
Neurotic : accuracy levels decreased as stress levels increased
Stable: showed rising levels of accuracy as stress levels increased
A03- anxiety control groups
One problem with many lab-based and real- life studies of anxiety is that they only compare high and low anxiety groups
- the inverted u theory cannot be properly tested unless there is a moderate control group aswell
A03- weapon focus affect may not be relevant
- study that Johnson and Scott may actually be testing surprise rather anxiety.
Pickel et al (1998)- measured anxiety in a hairdressing salon
= ew accuracy was significantly lower in the higher unusualness conditions, not necessarily threat
= lowers internal validity of J+S
Evaluation of yuille and cutshall
- unethical
- physiological harm
-other extraneous variables, not anxiety, that would efffect memory after 5 months - “control group” reduces DC as not all ppts would know what was going to happen
- supports/ gives credit to amusement 2
- high ecological/ external validity
Evaluation of yuille and cutshall method type (natural)
- ppts cannot be randomly allocated to the “stressed” vs. “Non stressed” groups, so there is a high chance of confounding variables
- can’t control things like post- event discussion, as they are not in a lab environment
- cannot be ethically replicated- reliability ???!!