memory ao3 Flashcards
CI - support effectiveness
Kohnken - 41% more accurate than standard
CI - time consuming
time + requires trainging = unrealistic for police (Kebbell)
CI - Not all elements usefull
recall everything + reinstate context paired = best recall (Bull)
MISLEADING INFO - RWA
Insights applied to police interviewing + expert witnesses. Psychologists can improve legal system
—- film clips in lab are less stressful than everyday life, no consequences. (Ppts less motivated to be accurate) EWT more reliable
MISLEADING INFO - EVIDENCE AGAINST SUBSTITUTION
central details not much affected by misleading info (Hayne - video clip then misleading q)
MISLEADING INFO - EVIDENCE CHALLENGING MEMORY CONFORMITY
post-event info on hair colour blended, supporting contamination (Skagerberg + Wright)
MISLEADING Q - DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS
Lab environment enable control but answers in lab study are influenced by desire to be helpful (demand ch)
MISLEADING Q - DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS
Lab environment enable control but answers in lab study are influenced by desire to be helpful (demand ch)
ANXIETY - UNUSUALNESS NOT ANXIETY
Poor recall due to unusualness (chicken + handgun), not anxiety (Pickel)
ANXIETY - SUPPORT FOR NEGATIVE EFFECTS
London Dungeon - anxiety reduced accurate recall for an individual (Valentine)
heart rate put into high + low anxiety groups - sp. weapon focus
ANXIETY - SUPPORT FOR POSITIVE EFFECTS
The most anxious eyewitness at a bank robbery had the most accurate recall (Christianson) ~ at least 75% accurate across all witnesses
— interviews were long after the event, lacks cntrl of confounding variables
ANXIETY - PROBLEMS W/ INVERTED U
Explains contradictory findings but focuses on just physical arousal, ignores cognitive aspects of anxiety
RETRIEVAL FAILURE - RWA
Cues are weak but worth paying attention to as strategy for improving recall
RETRIEVAL FAILURE - RS
wide range of sp. suggests that this is main reason for forgetting (Keane)
— no forgetting unless context are very different eg. on land/sea (Baddley)
RETRIEVAL FAILURE - RECALL VS COGNITION
limitation - No context effects when memory assessed using recognition tests (Godden + Baddley)