AGGRESSION Flashcards
FUSTRATION-AGGRESSION: RS
Marcus-Newhall (2000)
Meta-analysis (49) studies of displaced aggression
showed aggression is displaced against more weaker targets
FUSTRATION-AGGRESSION: ROLE OF CATHARSIS
Limitation
Bushman (2002)
People who hit a punching bag became more aggressive not less, doing nothing reduced aggression more than venting (punching the bag)
FUSTRATION-AGGRESSION: LINK
Limitation
Frustration does not always lead to aggression, aggression can occur without frustration (not automatic) - applies to some situations not all
— BERKOWITZ (1989) negative affect theory, aggression caused by a range of negative feelings. Aggressive beh triggered by negative feelings in general which affect frustration leads to many beh.
UNIVERAL EVALUATION FOR SOCIAL EXPLANATIONS - CULTURAL DIFFERENCES
- aggression is viewed differently in a variety of cultures
- Kun San of Kalahari desert people discourage + frown up aggressive Beh.
UNIVERAL EVALUATION FOR SOCIAL EXPLANATIONS - ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION
The social psychological explanations only looks at aggression from a social
learning/psychodynamic perspective.
It does not take into account other explanations such as biological viewpoints.
DE-INDIVIDUATION — REAL LIFE APPLICATION
This can explain aggressive behaviour in online gaming
services such as Xbox Live, or on social media such as
instagram, facebook etc. You are able to hide your identity
by creating a handle ‘Misty231’. The internet allows people
to be anonymous and there is a presence of a crowd ‘world
wide audience’
DE-INDIVIDUATION — RESEARCH SUPPORT
Douglas (2001) strong positive correlation between anonymity + flaming posting hostile messages. Common troll beh
—- Gergen (1973) strangers in a darkened room were not aggressive but became intimate (kissed/touched) repeated = no violence/agg
DE-INDIVIDUATION — LIMITATION- ROLE OF NORMS
SIDE model, de-individualisation leads to conformity to group norms rather than ignore them (Spears + Lea)
DISPOSITIONAL EXPLANATION - RS INTO IMPORTATION MODEL
DeLisi et al (2011) found that inmates who had negative dispositional features such as childhood trauma, high levels
of aggression and substance abuse were more likely to engage in suicidal activity, sexual misconduct and acts of
physical violence.
DISPOSITIONAL EXPLANATION - RS
Camp + Gaes
No difference in aggression between low + high security prisons (33% v 36%) inmate characteristics more important
DISPOSITIONAL EXPLANATION - IGNORES KEY FACTORS
Dilulio (1991)
How prison run, weak leadership, unofficial rules = administration control model
suggested that the importation model ignores the roles of prison officials and proposes that poor management of prisons leads to inmate violence including homicide and rioting.
Other factors include staff who are distant from inmates and few opportunities for education.
He referred to this as ACM - Administrative Control Model
SITUATIONAL EXPLANATIONS - RS
Inmate homicides motivated by prison deprivation eg arguments over possessions, drugs (Cunningham et al)
SITUATIONAL EXPLANATIONS - CONTRADICTORY FINDINGS
Hensley et al (2002) found that conjugal visits made no difference to levels of violence in male
and female prisons in Mississippi, USA