MEMORY Flashcards
What is capacity?
A measure of how much can be held in memory.
What is the capacity of STM?
Miller (1956) concluded about 7 items sometimes less and sometimes (7+_2).
Jacobs (1887) 9.3 seconds for digits and 7.3 for letters. He suggest because there are only nine digits but 26 letters.
What is the evaluation of capacity of STM?
Cowan (2001) reviewed that STM is likely to be limited to 5 chunks which is not as extensive as once thought.
Jacobs found that recall increased steadily with age, eight year olds could recall on average 6.6 digits, while 19 year olds recalled 8.6 digits.
What is duration?
A measure a how long a memory lasts before it’s no longer available.
What is the duration of STM?
18 seconds.
Peterson and Peterson - used constant syllables and doubt that participants recalled correctly 90% of the time after 3 seconds, 20% after 9 seconds and only 2% correct after 18 seconds.
What is the evaluation for duration of STM?
Trying to memorise consonant syllables does not truly reflect most everyday memory activities.
Reitman (1974) used auditory tones instead of numbers so that displacement doesn’t occur (sounds don’t interfere with verbal rehearsal) and STM’s duration was longer.
What is the duration of LTM
2 minutes to 100 years.
What is coding?
The way information is changed so that it can be stored in memory such as visual codes (picture), acoustic codes (sounds), semantic codes (the meaning of the experience).
What did Allan Baddeley (1966a and 1996b) find out about acoustic and semantic coding?
STM is largely encoded acoustically (through sounds) and LTM is largely encoded semantically (through meaning).
What is the evaluation for coding?
Baddeley tested LTM after just 20 minutes- which really isn’t LTM.
STM appears to rely on acoustic coding for storing information but some experiment shows visual coding. Bandimote (1992) found that participants used visual coding in STM is a visual task was given.
Describe what happens to information based on the multi-store model of memory?
- Environmental stimuli enters the sensory model.
- If a person pays attention to sensory store then the data is transferred to STM.
- Information disappears from STM when new information enters displacing the original information.
- Repetition keeps information in STM but eventually such repetition creates a long term memory.
- The process of getting information from LTM involves the information passing back through STM.
What are the strengths of the MSM.
Studies using brain scanning techniques have also demonstrated that there is a difference between LTM and STM. (STM to prefrontal cortex, LTM to hippocampus.)
What are the limitations of the MSM?
MSM is too simple, STM and LTM are not unitary stores.
LTM involves elaborative rather than just maintenance rehearsal.
What are the 4 parts of the working memory model?
The central executive.
The Phonological loop.
Visio-spatial sketchpad.
Episodic buffer.
What does the Central Executive act as?
Monitors and coordinates all other mental functions in WM.
What is the role of the phonological loop?
Preserves order of auditory information.
- Phonological store holds the words heard. Like an inner ear.
- An articulatory process which is used for words that are heard or seen. These words are silently repeated (looped) like an inner voice.
What is the role of a visuo-spatial sketchpad?
When you have to plan a visual task. Visual information is what things look like and Spatial information is the physical relationship between things.
It’s split into two:
- A visual cache which stores information about visual items.
- An inner scribe which stores the arrangement of objects into the visual field.
What’s an episodic buffer do?
Records events (episodes) as they happen links to LTM.
What are the strengths of the working memory model?
Shallice and Warrington (1979) studies a man who’s short-term forgetting of auditory information was much more than that of visual stimuli. Thus his brain damage was restricted to the phonological loop.
What are the limitations of the working memory model?
A man who had his central executive was suggested intact through tests requiring reasoning couldn’t pick where to eat for hours.
The central executive is unsatisfactory because it fails to explain anything and is probably more complex than currently represented.