Memory Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is memory

A

The way the mind stores and resembles info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the duration of sensory memory

A

Less than half a second

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the coding of sensory memory

A

Iconic- visual

Echoic- acoustic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the capacity of short term memory

A

Between 5 and 9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the coding in short term memory

A

Acoustic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the duration of short term memory

A

18-30 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the coding for long term memory

A

Semantic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the capacity of long term memory

A

Unlimited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the duration of long term memory

A

Up to a life time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Procedure

Sperling 1960

A

Presented a grid of letters for less than a second.

Then participants were asked to recall immediately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sperling 1960

Results

A

Capacity- recalled on average 4 letters
Duration- info decays in around 2 seconds
Encoding- visual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

who did research on digit span and what was the research on

A

jacobs 1887

research on capacity of stm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how was capacity of stm investigated

A

participants would be asked to recall 4 digits in order out loud then 5 digits the 6 and so on until the participant cannot recall in the correct order.
was found that the mean span for digits was 9.3 and for letters was 7.3.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

explain millers observations of span of memory and chunking

A

he observed that thing usual come in sevens. this suggests that the span of stm is 7 plus or minus 2.
he also noted that people can recall 5 words as well as 5 letters. they do this by chunking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

who did research on the duration of stm

A

peterson and peterson 1959

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

peterson and peterson procedure

A

24 undergraduate students. took part in eight trials. each trial the student was given a trigram to remember and a 3 digit number. they had to count backwards from that number in threes or fours until told to stop. this was to prevent rehearsal.recall was tested after 3,6,9,12 and 18 seconds. know as retention interval.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

peterson and peterson findings

A

longer the retention interval the lower the percentage of correct responses. suggests stm has a very low duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

who did research on the duration of ltm

A

bahrick et al 1975

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

bahrick et al procedure

A

392 pp’s aged between 17 and 74. recall was tested in various ways such as photo recognition consisting of 50 photos , and free recall where pps recalled names of people from their graduating class.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

bahrick et al findings

A

those tested within 15 years of graduation were 90% accurate on photo recognition. after 48 years recall declined to about 70% for photo recognition. free recall was worse than photo recognition. after 15 years it was about 60% and after 48 years it dropped to 30%. suggests ltm can last very long.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

limitation of baddeleys research on coding

A

used artificial stimuli, the word lists had no meaning to the pp’s. means we should be cautious about generalising findings to different kinds of memory tasks. so has limited application

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

limitation if jacobs research on the capacity of stm.

A

it was conducted a long time ago ad so lacks external validity. early research often lacked adequate control. but results from other research has confirmed the findings so supports its validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

limitation of millers research on capacity of stm

A

may have overestimated the capacity . cowan 2001 reviewed other research and concluded the capacity is actually only 4 the lower end of millers estimate may be more appropriate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

limitation of peterson and peterson

A

stimulus was artificial. trying to remember trigrams does not reflect most real life memory activities where what we are trying to remember is more meaningful. so lacked external validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

strength of bahrick et al

A

used real life meaningful memories. when research with meaningless stimuli was used the results were lower. this increases the external validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

who proposed the multi store model of memory

A

atkinson and shriffin 1968/71

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

how is information transferred from sensory register to stm

A

by paying attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

how is information transferred from stm to ltm

A

maintenance rehearsal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

how is information transferred from ltm back to stm

A

retrieval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

strength of the multi store model of memory

A

supported by research to show ltm and stm are qualitatively differently. baddeley found they are coded differently so supports the multi store model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

weaknesses of the multi store model of memory

A

suggests that ltm and stm are unitary store however research into amnesia patients suggests there are more than one type of long term and short term memory.
Craik and Watkins 1973 also suggested that maintenance rehearsal does not transfer information into ltm. Only maintains information in stm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Explain episodic memory

A

Refers to ability to recall events. It has been likened to a diary. For example your recent visit to the dentist and so on. Memories are time stamped. You have to make a conscious effort to recall episodic memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Explain semantic memory

A

Contains our knowledge of the world. This includes facts but in the broadest possible sense. It has been likened to a dictionary. For example it contains a number of concepts such as animals and love. Memories are not timestamped. It contains an immense collection of material which is constantly being added to.

34
Q

Explain procedural memory

A

This is our memory for actions or skills. We can recall these memories without a conscious effort. A good example is driving a car. These are the sort of skills we might find quite hard to explain to someone else.

35
Q

He came up with the types of long-term memory

A

Tulving 1985

36
Q

Strengths of the types of long-term memory

A

There is clinical evidence.Case studies of HM and Clive wearing. Episodic memory in both men were severely impaired but the semantic memory was unaffected . This supports the idea that there are different memory stores. There is also evidence from brain scans. They show types of memory are stored in different parts of the brain. They found episodic and semantic memories were both recalled from an area known as the prefrontal cortex.

37
Q

What are the three slave systems in the working memory model

A

Phonological loop
Visuo spatial sketch pad
Episodic buffer

38
Q

What is the central executive

A

And attentional process that monitors incoming data makes decisions of allocates slave systems to tasks. Has a very limited processing capacity.

39
Q

Describe the phonological loop

A

Deals with auditory information.

Subdivided into the phonological store and the articulatory process.

40
Q

Describe the Visuo spatial sketch pad

A

Stores visual and or spatial information when required.
Limited capacity according to Baddeley 2003. Around 3 or 4.
Logie 1995 subdivided it into two: visual cache and inner scribe

41
Q

Explain the episodic buffer

A

Temporary store for information integrating the visual spatial and verbal information processed by other stores

42
Q

Strengths of the working memory model

A

Shallice and Warrington 1970 study of KF. suffered from brain damage. Poor ability for verbal information could process visual information normally. Suggest that his phonological loop had been damaged but the other areas were left in tact.
Dual task Performance supports the seperate existence of the visual spatial sketch pad.

43
Q

Weaknesses of the working memory model

A

Baddeley Said that the central executive is the most important but the least understood component. The central executive needs to be more clearly specified. This means the working memory model hasn’t been fully explained.

44
Q

What are the two types of interference

A

Proactive interference and retroactive interference

45
Q

What is proactive interference

A

When an older memory interferes with a newer one

46
Q

What is retro active interference

A

When a newer memory interferes with an older one

47
Q

Mcgeogh and McDonald 1931 procedure

A

Pps has to learn two sets of words
Including synonyms, antonyms, words unrelated to the original ones, nonsense syllables, three digit number and no new lists

48
Q

Mcgeogh and McDonald

Findings

A

More similarity decreased the accuracy of recall.

So interference is strongest when the memories are similar.

49
Q

Strengths of the interference theory

A

Thousands of lab experiments have been carried out into this explanation for forgetting. Most studies show that both types of interference very likely to be ways we forget information.
Baddeley and Hitch 1977 conducted experiments with rugby players. They were asked to name the teams they had played against. this is a strength because it shows interference can be applied to everyday situations

50
Q

Limitations if interference theory

A

Uses artificial materials. It doesn’t reflect the things we have to try and remember in everyday life. Makes interference much more likely in the lab. May not be as likely an explanation for forgetting in everyday life.

51
Q

What is encoding specificity principle

A

States that if a cue is the help us recall information it has to be present at encoding and at retrieval. If the cues available at encoding and retrieval are different then there will be some forgetting. So e cues are meaningful whilst others are not.

52
Q

Context dependant forgetting godden and baddeley 1975 procedure

A

Carried out an experiment with deep sea divers. They had to learn a list of words either on land or under water. They then either had to recall the words on land or under water.

53
Q

Godden and baddeley findings

A

Accurate recall was 40% lower in the non matching conditions. The external cues there at learning were not available at retrieval so accuracy was lower.

54
Q

State dependant forgetting Carter and cassaday procedure

A

Gave anti histamines, to the participants. Had a mild sedative effect. Either had to learn the words in normal conditions or whilst on the drug. They then had to recall the words either in noreal conditions or on the drug.

55
Q

Carter and cassaday findings

A

When there was a mismatch between internal state at learning and recall, accuracy was significantly worse.so when the cues were absent there was forgetting.

56
Q

Strengths of baddeley and godden and Carter and cassaday

A

There is a lot of supporting evidence to support retrieval failure. This increases the validity. It also has real life applications. For example when you go downstairs am forget what you went down for.

57
Q

Limitations of baddeley and godden and Carter and cassaday

A

Context effects are not usually as extreme in real life situations. Environmental differences are not usually strong enough. Limitation because it means the real life applications don’t really explain much.

58
Q

Loftus and palmer 1974 procedure

A

Showed participants clips of car crashes and then asked them questions on them. The critical question was to do with the speed of the cars. The verb of the questions was changed.eg hit smashed collided bumped

59
Q

Loftus and palmer 1974 findings

A

The mean speed was calculated for each verb. For contacted the mean was 31.8 the mean for smashed was 40.5. Shows the question does have an influence.

60
Q

Explain the response bias explanation

A

Suggests the wording of the question has no real effect on memory but only influences how they decide to answer.

61
Q

Explain the substitution explanation

A

Says the wording of the question does actually change the persons memory. Those who heard the verb smashed was later more likely to report seeing broken glass even though there wasn’t any.

62
Q

Gabbert et Al 2003 procedure

A

Showed participants the same crime but from different angles. They then discussed what they had seen before individually completing a test of recall.

63
Q

Gabbert et Al findings

A

71% recalled aspects of the even that they had not seen but had picked up from the Co witness. In a control group with no discussion it was 0%. Shows witnessed often go along with each other to gain approval or because they think they are wrong. Known as memory conformity.

64
Q

Strengths of research into misleading information

A

Has hugely important practical uses in the real world. Loftus 1975 believes lading questions have such a big impact that police should be careful how they word the questions when interviewing. Strength because it can help improve the legal system.

65
Q

Limitations of research into misleading information.

A

Loftus and palmer showed video clips of accidents which is very different from witnessing an actual crime. Lacks stress. Limitation as it tells us very little about how leading questions affect witnesses in real life.

66
Q

Johnson and Scott 1976 procedure

A

Led participants to believe they were going to take part in a lab study. While waiting in a waiting room they over heard an argument in the other room. In the low anxiety condition they saw a man walk through the waiting area hoeing a pen with grease on his hands. Other participants heard the same argument but a,so heard breaking glass. A man then walked through carrying a paper knife that was covered in blood. This was he high anxiety condition.

67
Q

Johnson and Scott 1976 finding

A

Participants then had to pick out the man from 50 photos. 49% of those who saw the man carrying the pen were able to identify him. 33% of those who saw the man carrying the knife were able to identify him. The tunnel theory suggests this was because the witness was too busy paying all their attention on the weapon because it was the source of anxiety.

68
Q

Yuille and cutshall 1986 procedure

A

Conducted a study on a real life shot in in a gunship in Canada. The shop owner shot the their dead. 13 witnesses took part in the study. Interviews were held 4-5 months after the incident and we’re compared to the original police interviews. Accuracy was determined by the number of details reported. They were also asked to rate how stressed they were at the time and whether they have had any emotional problems since.

69
Q

yuille and cutshall 1986 findings

A

there was little change in accuracy after 5 months. some details were less accurate. those who reported higher levels of stress were more accurate (about 88% compared to 75% for the less stressed group).

70
Q

explain yerkes dodson law 1908

A

states the relationship between emotional arousal and performance looks like an inverted U.

71
Q

explain how daffenbacher 1983 applied the yerkes dodson law to EWT.

A

he said lower levels of anxiety produce much lower levels of recall accuracy. memory becomes more accurate as you increase anxiety experienced. but there comes a point where the optimum level of anxiety is reached. this is the point of maximum accuracy. anything above this accuracy declines.

72
Q

limitation of johnson and scott

A

tests surpirse rather than anxiety. the reason the participants focus on the weapon is because they are surprised at what they see. pickel 1998 conducted a similar experiment using scissors, a handgun, a wallet and a raw chicken. it was conducted in a hairdressers. accuracy was lower with the chicken because of its unusualness. so weapon focus is due to unusualness rather than anxiety caused.
ethical issues because they are causing unnessaccary anxiety and psychological harm

73
Q

limitation of yuille and cutshall

A

lacks control. eyewitnesses are tested sometime after the incident occured. all sorts of things would have happened to the witness during this time that the researcher has no control over. could affect the accuracy of recall.

74
Q

who created the idea of cognitive interview

A

fisher and geiselman 1992

75
Q

what are the four techniques used in the cognitive interview

A

report everything
reinstate the context
reverse the order
change the perspective

76
Q

explain the ‘recall everything’ technique

A

witnesses are encouraged to include every detail of the event even if they think its not important or if they dont feel confident about it. they could be important and may trigger other important memories.

77
Q

explain the ‘reinstate the context’ technique

A

witness should return to the crime scene in their mind and imagine the environment and their emotions. this is related to context dependant forgetting.

78
Q

explain the ‘reverse the order’ technique

A

events should be recalled in a different chronological order to the original sequence. this prevents them reporting their expectations of how the event must have happened rather than the actual event. also prevents dishonesty.

79
Q

explain the ‘ change perspective’ technique

A

they should recall the incident from other peoples perspectives. done to disrupt the effect of expectations and schema on recall.

80
Q

explain the enhanced cognitive interview

A

fisher et al 1987
developed additional aspects such as reducing eyewitness anxiety, minimising distractions, getting the witness to speak slowly and asking open ended questions.

81
Q

limitations of the cognitive interview

A

time consuming and requires special training. this means it is unlikely that the proper version of CI is actually used.

82
Q

strengths of the cognitive interview

A

milne and bull 2002 found each element was equally valuable so using at least two of the elements could be used to improve police interviewing.
meta analysis by kohnken et al 1999 showed enhanced cognitive interview provided more correct information than the standard interview used by police. shows there are real practical benefits to the police.