issues and debates Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

when do ethical implications arise

A

when there is a conflict between psychologys need for valid and valuable results whilst trying to uphold the rights and dignities of the participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how are ethical implications resolved

A

ethical guidelines established

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

socially sensitive research

A

some research more controversial than others, more controversial=more attention, this research is important and so psychologists have a social responsibility and should not be put off

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

who identified a number of concerns that psychologists should be mindful of when conducting socially sensitive research

A

Sieber and Stanley 1988

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

implications (seiber and stanley)

A

wider effects should be considered so they are not seen to be giving scientific credence to prejudice and discrimination. this may be difficult to predict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

uses/public policies (seiber and stanley)

A

what is it used for and what would happen if it was misused should be considered as research may be used to make new policies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

validity of the research (seiber and stanley)

A

findings that were thought to be subjective have turned out to be suspect and fraudulent so researchers should be open about their own biases and preconceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

evaluation

benefits of socially sensitive research

A

studies of underrepresented issues may increase the sensitivity and understanding thus helping to reduce prejudice and encourage acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

evaluation

framing the question

A

way in which questions are framed may influence how data is interpreted. eg research into ‘alternative relationships’ led to ‘heterosexual bias’ where homosexual relation are compared and scrutinised again heterosexual relations. investigators must approach with an open mind and be prepared to be challenged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

evaluation

who gains?

A

socially sensitive research is used by the government. research that seeks to manipulate the public has ethical implications and it is difficult to know who actually gains

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

idiographic approach

A

aims to describe the nature of the individual, studied as unique entities with no attempt to compare to a larger group. produces qualitative data using case studies and unstructured interviews

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

which approaches demonstrate the idiographic approach

A

humanistic and psychodynamic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

nomothetic approach

A

produces general laws of human behaviour, provides a ‘bench mark’ which people can be compared against using scientific experiments with large sample sizes hypotheses are rigorously tested and statistically analysed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

which approaches demonstrate the nomothetic approach

A

cognitive, behaviourist and biological

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

case for idiographic

A

provides complete global account of the individual, may complement nomothetic by shedding light on or challenging general laws, the single case may generate further hypothesis for future study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

case against idiographic

A

narrow and restrictive nature, generalisations cannot be made, least scientific

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

case for nomothetic

A

more scientific due to standardised procedures, enables norms too be established, greater scientific credibility

18
Q

case against nomothetic

A

accused of ‘ losing the person’, knowing statistics about a disorder doesnt tell us anything about what it is actually like to live with it, subjective experience ignored, overlooks richness of human experience

19
Q

holism

A

the idea that any attempt to break up behaviour and experience is inappropriate as these can only be understood by analysing the person or behaviour as a whole

20
Q

reductionism

A

analyses behaviour by breaking it down into constituent parts. based on scientific principle that all phenomena should be explained using the most basic principles

21
Q

levels of explanation in psychology

A

different ways of viewing the same phenomena in psychology some more reductionist than others. in the science hierarchy lower levels are more reductionist

22
Q

biological reductionism

A

based on the premise that we are all biological organisms made up of physiological structures and processes. so behaviour can be explained through biological factors. led to practical applications such as psychoactive drugs in treating mental disorders

23
Q

environment stimulus

A

behaviourist approach. breaks complex learning into simple stimulus response links that are measurable in the lab. analysis occurs at the physical level and ignores any cognitive factors

24
Q

case for holism

A

some social behaviour only occurs in group situations such as conformity and so cannot be understood by only studying the individual. holism provide a more complete and global understanding of behaviour

25
Q

case against holism

A

cant undergo rigorous scientific testing and so can become vague and speculative. higher levels consider too many factors and so it becomes difficult to establish which is most important. little application to real world problems.

26
Q

case for reductionism

A

allows operationalisation so allows reliable experiments to take place. gives psychology greater scientific credibility

27
Q

case against reductionism

A

accused of oversimplifying complex phenomena resulting in a loss of validity. only explains how and not why. so can only form part of an explanation

28
Q

nature nurture debate

A

concerned with the extent to which aspects if behaviour are a product of inherited or acquired characteristics

29
Q

nature

A

nativists argued human characteristics are innate and the result of hereditary

30
Q

heritability coefficient

A

used to assess heredity. number between 1 and 0 and indicates the extent to which a characteristic is genetic. 1=100% genetic

31
Q

nurture

A

mind is a blank slate at birth which learning and experience comes from the environment

32
Q

the interactionist approach

A

the idea that nature creates nurture and so heredity and environment interact

33
Q

diathesis stress model

A

need a biological vulnerability which is only expressed after an environmental stress acts as a trigger.

34
Q

epigenetics

A

change in genetic activity without changing genetic code and is caused by interaction with our environment. events leave marks on DNA which may go on to influence the genetic code of our children

35
Q

evaluation

implications of nativism and empiricism

A

extreme determinist stance of nativists has led to controversy
empiricists ideas have led to successful therapy but this may lead to people using this to control and manipulate citizens

36
Q

evaluation

shared and unshared environments

A

research often involves siblings but the issue arises when siblings usually are brought up in the same environment so it is difficult to determine what is influencing the characteristic. the sibling may experience life events differently which would explain why mz twins do not show perfect concordance rates

37
Q

evaluation

constructivism

A

when people actively create their own nurture by choosing environments that are most appropriate for their nature. the environment they chose then influences their development

38
Q

free will

A

the view that humans are self determining and free to chose their own thoughts and actions

39
Q

determinism

A

idea that free will has no place in explaining behaviour

40
Q

hard determinism

A

suggests that all human behaviour has a cause so it should be possible to identify and describe the causes compatible with the aims of science. always assume that everything we think and do is dictated by internal or external forces

41
Q

soft determinism

A

suggests there is some room for manoeuvre in that people do have some mental control over the way we behave

42
Q

biological determinism

A

the belief that behaviour is caused by biological influences that we cannot control.