Memory Flashcards

1
Q

Three stages of memory

A

Encoding - transferring external stimulus to internal representation.

Storage - short term/long term, not all memories make it to long term.

Retrieval - reaccesssing stored memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Implict memory

A

AKA Procedural
Unconscious
Things we automatically remember how to do
Examples: how to walk, how to ride a bike…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explicit memory

A

AKA Declarative
Conscious
Memory of specific events or facts we have learned
E.g. a walk you went on, your last lecture…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rovee-Collier (1980) - mobile reinforcement paradigm

A

Ribbon attached to babies foot
Quickly understood moving foot makes mobile move
Remove mobile and ribbon
Attach child’s foot again after a delay
Did kicking rate increase from baseline (remember)

6-7mo tested 1, 7, 14 or 21 days after training
If same mobile used remembered 14 days later
Did not transfer to different mobiles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Memory capacity

A

Amount we can process in working memory.

Greater working memory capacity means more can be stored in STM and more encoded in LTM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How to measure memory capacity

A

Digit span: how many numbers can you recall in a sequence.

Serial recall: how many unrelated words that can be remembered in a sequence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Capacity increase with age

A

McCormack, Brown, Vouseden (2000)

  • Letter recall improves with age.
  • Debate whether due to increased capacity or processing speed.

Some studies suggest because children get quicker at naming things they can fit more into their phonological loop (Croker, 2012).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Wilson, Scott & Power (1987) - Visuo Spatial Task

A

5, 7, 11yo + adults

Shown set of blocks and asked which block was missing.

Difference in length of pause between seeing pattern and identifying block.

Condition 1: 2 second pause, no distractions
Condition 2: 10 second pause, no distractions
Condition 3: 10 second pause, counting task distraction

RESULTS:
Argue children reached adult levels of visuo-spatial memory by 11 as they performed equally to adults at this age.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Memory strategies - organisation - chunking

A

Chunking - digit span of 7 but if we chunk into larger numbers we remember more.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Sodian (1986) - Organisation

A

4 and 6yo play with different toys

Told to either:
Play and remember toys
Sort into categories and remember toys

After 2 minutes the toys were hidden and either:
Free recall: asked to remember all the toys they could
Cued recall: Doll asked them to remember all blue toys

RESULTS:
4yo remembered more when asked to sort them.
6yo remembered just as well in playing or sorting.
Older children using organisation without prompts.
6yo could have been using another strategy altogether

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Schneider (1986) - organisation

A

7 and 10yo given black and white drawings to remember.

Drawings different in relation to a category (furniture):
Very related: chair, table, desk, sofa
Less related: fridge, stool, bookcase, stove

Results:
7yo
Used chunking when objects were very related
Very few sorted at all: 10%

10yo
Used chunking in both conditions equally
60% used chunking overall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Rehearsal - memory strategies

A

Consciously repeating information over and over again to remember it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Flabell et al. (1966) - rehearsal

A

5, 7 and 10yo given paintings of objects to remember.

Experimenter pointed at paintings in order.

Child asked to point in same order immediately after or 15 secs later.

Experimenter taught to read lips to see sub-vocalisation

RESULTS:
Use of subvocal rehearsal:
10% - 5yo
60% - 7yo
85% - 10yo 

7yo who used rehearsal had better immediate and delayed recall than those who didn’t.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ornstein et al. (1975) - rehearsal

A

8, 11 and 13yo shown items.

Two conditions:
Rehearse out loud
Try and remember as many words as possible

Immediate recall (no delay).

Older children rehearsed more words at a time (4, 4.5) than younger (2.5) so recall was better.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Naus (1977) - can children be taught rehearsal?

A

9 and 12yo

Two conditions:
Rehearse as normal
Rehearse most recent plus two others (teaching to rehearse multiple items at once)

RESULTS:
12yo:
No difference between groups
Spontaneously rehearse more than 3 items

9yo:
Better once told how to rehearse effectively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Limitations to study of memory strategies

A

Use of rehearsal and organisation increases with age but:

Only looking at short term memory

Possible long term memory strategy:
Elaboration (linking thngs together to remember them).

17
Q

Why don’t young children use strategies

A

Mediation deficiency:
Don’t have the ability to use them
Strategies beyond their capabilities

Production deficiency:
Just don’t automatically use them
If taught, they are capable of using them effectively

Utilisation deficiency:
Younger children can use strategies but they don’t aid memory

18
Q

Infantile amnesia definition

A

Lack of enduring autobiographical memories from before 3yo

19
Q

Causes of infantile amnesia

A

Freud:
Repression of traumatic events.

Development of language:
Change in way memories are stored and retrieved.
Preverbal memories not accessible with new processes

Development of self:
Become able to organise autobiographical memories in reference to self.

Encoding failure:
Too poorly encoded to be maintained
Memory system to immature to support retention

20
Q

Bauer and Mandler (1989) - infant amnesia

A

21mo shown three event sequences:
Familiar
Novel causal - each step linked to next one
Novel arbitrary - no cause or order between steps

Children showed immediate recall and delayed (6 weeks) recall for objects and order of events in familiar and novel causal only.

21
Q

Replication (younger sample) of Bauer & Mandler (1989) - infant amnesia

A

16mo and 20mo (within infant amnesia timeframe).

Less delay - immediate and 2 weeks.

20mo could remember actions and order beter
Novel-causal remembered the best
Immediate and delayed recall for familiar
Delayed recall for novel only for 20mo

Only verbal recall was used,

22
Q

Simcock & Haynes (2002) - infant amnesia - non verbal recall

A

27, 33 and 39mo engaged in novel event at their house

Tested for memory after 6m and 1y on verbal recall, photographic recall and re-eneactment.

RESULTS:
Age increases = better recall at 6m and 1y
Verbal recall lower for all ages
Shows that children do have autobiographical memories when not using verbal recall.

Should be noted:
Amnesia said to be 2-3yo so these children could be past it.

Also cues (photos) may have caused better recall and not the nonverbal nature of the task.

Children only used vocab they had at the time which shows that encoding is stuck at the time of the event.

23
Q

Peterson & Rideout (1998) - infantile amnesia - injury

A

Compared preverbal (<25mo) and verbal (26-34mo) memories of serious injury.

Interviewed them 6 months after injury.

RESULTS:
Children who were preverbal at time provided less details even though they are verbal now.

Used statistics to control for age at time of interview and found that older children at time of injury still recalled more.

24
Q

Howe & Courage (1993) - infantile amnesia - development of self

A

Development of self:

Signifies ability to create autobiographical memories.

Previously memories coded as general learning experience and not associated with ‘me’.

Significant development of self between 18-24mo which is similar to the time when infantile amnesia ends

25
Q

Yes - Infantile Amnesia exists

A

Bjorklund (1992): often our earliest memries are things that happened to others or that others have repeated to us.

Simcock & Hayne (2002): memories prelanguage are stored in different ways to postlanguage and can only be retrieved nonverbally.

Peterson & Rideout (1998): controlling for age, verbal children remember more than preverbal at time of injury.

Fivush & Hammond (1990): young children’s memories don’t have distinct enough cues, babies haven’t learnt framework for recounting stories and events so they focus on routine and novel characteristics.

26
Q

No - Infantile Amnesia doesn’t exist

A

Rovee-Collier & Bauer:
Children are ableto remember things prior to 3yo
Implicit memories are more robust with age

Bauer:
Not a separate phenomenon
Babies are just bad at encoding and consolidation
They have autobiographical memories but can’t measure them.

27
Q

Methodological issues with infantile amnesia studies

A

Disagreement with what constitutes as an early memory.

Ask to recall significant events in early years but what is ‘significant’

Asking for a verbal account: age differences may just reflect language difficulties as it is unlikely to be a verbal event recalled.