memory Flashcards

1
Q

what is coding?

A

the process of converting information between different forms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how did Baddeley (1996) research coding?

A

gave different lists of words to 4 groups of participants and asked to recall them in the correct prder
1. acoustically similar: cat cab can
2. acoustically dissimilar: pit few cow
3. semantically similar: great large big
4. semantically dissimilar: good huge hot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what were baddeleys (1996) findings?

A

when recalling from STM, they did worse with acoustically similar words and after a time interval of 20 mins, recalling from LTM, they did worse with semantically similar words

shows info is coded ACOUSTICALLY in STM and SEMANTICALLY in LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

baddeley evaluation: (strength) how does it show there are 2 separate memory stores?

A

it shows there are separate memory stores (helped to understand the multi-store model) as STM uses acoustic coding and LTM uses semantic coding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

baddeley evaluation: (limitation) how does it show that there is limited application?

A

it used artificial stimuli rather than meaningful material so limited application
the word lists had no meaning to participants meaning his findings may not tell us much about coding in everyday life memory tasks (may use semantic coding for STM tasks)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is capacity?

A

the amount of information that can be stored in the various memory stores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how did jacobs (1887) research capacity and what were his findings?

A

measured digit span: read 4 digits out loud for participant to recall, added digits until participants could not recall the order correctly
found the mean span for digits was 9.3 and the mean span for letters was. 7.3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

evaluation: (strength) how is it a valid study for digit span?

A

it has been replicated and therefore is a valid study for digit span(by boop and verhaeghen 2005)
his experiment lacked controls (a confounding variable is that some participants may have been distracted and therefore the spans were underestimated)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how did miller (1956) investigate the capacity of STM?

A

found that things come in groups of 7 (days of the week, musical notes on a scale)
believed the capacity was 7+- 2 items (5-9) and we do this by chunking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is chunking?

A

grouping sets of digits or letters into units or chunks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

evaluation: (limitation) how did he overestimate Stm capacity (allegedly)

A

he may have overestimated STM capacity
cowan (2011) concluded that the capacity is about 4 +-1 items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is duration?

A

the length of time information can be held in memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the duration of STM? ( Peterson and Peterson 1959)

A

18 secs unless we do verbal rehearsal
(participant was asked to remember 3 letters e.g YGZ and asked to count backwards subtracting 3 from a 3 digit number e.g 724 and were told to stop after varying times [3,6,9,12,15,18] and recall the 3 letters)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

evaluation: (limitation of p^2 study) how did it lack external validity?

A

lacked external validity
the stimuli was artificial, although we remember meaning material e.g phone numbers, it is not representative of everyday memory tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the duration of LTM? (Bahrick et al.)

A

studied 392 students and tested their recall ability from highschool yearbooks (photo recognition test of classmates, recall test of classmates names)
participants tested within 15 years of grad were 90% etc
showing LTM capacity is up to a lifetime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

evaluation: (strength of bahrick et al.’s study) how does it have high external validity?

A

has high external validity
researched investigated meaningful memories (people’s names and faces) and when studies on LTM used meaningless pics, recall rates were lower
suggest his findings reflect a real estimate of the duration of STM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is the multi-store model of memory? (atkinson n shiffrin 1968/1971)

A

a representation of how memory works in terms of 3 stores called the sensory register, STM and LTM
and shows how information is transferred from one store to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What does the MSM say about the sensory register?

A
  • all stimuli from the environment pass into the SR
  • 2 main stores (a store for each sense): iconic memory for visual information and echoing memory for acoustic information
  • duration: less than 1/2 a second
  • capacity = very high
    KEY PROCESS IS ATTENTION to transfer information further into the memory system
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What does MSM say about STM?

A

limited capacity store, 7+-2
coded acoustically
maintenance rehearsal occurs when we repeat material to ourselves and can keep in our STM as long as rehearsed
passes into LTM if rehearsed long enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what does MSM say about LTM?

A

capacity = unlimited and are coded semantically
it has to be transferred back into STM by a process called RETRIEVAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

evaluation: (strength for the MSM) how does it show that badd?

A

shows STM and LTM are different and independent memory stores
Baddeley (1966) found we tend to mix up words that sound similar using our STMS but mix up words with similar meaning when using our LTMS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what is a counterpoint for the strength of the MSM?
how does it show that MSM may not be a valid model of how memory works?

A

mSM any not be a valid model of how memory works in our everyday lives where we have t9 remember much more meaningful information
experiments used material with no meaning (digits letters )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what is one limitation of the MSM? how does it suggest that the MSM is wrong to claim there is only 1 STM store?

A

suggests the MSM is wrong in claiming there is only 1 STM store process different types of information
KF had amnesia, his STM for digits was poor when read out to him but excellent when he read to himself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what is another limitation of the MSM? how does it not fully explain how long term storage is achieved?

A

MSM does not fully explain how long term storage is achieved
MSM says the amount of rehearsal is important but it was found that the type is more important
elaborative rehearsal is needed for long term storage, meaning information can be transferred to LTM without prolonged rehearsal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
what are the types of long term memory that Tulving (1985) proposed?
episodic memory semantic memory procedural memory
26
what is episodic memory?
LTM store that refers to our ability to recall personal events from our lives time stamped: rmr when they happened and what happened includes (complex) memories of people objects places and behaviours involved memories have to be retrieved consciously and with effort
27
what is semantic memory?
LTM store that contains our shared knowledge of the world less personal and more about the facts we all share (e.g meaning of words and hard concepts e.g animals and love) not time stamped tulving states it is less vulnerable to distortion and forgetting than episodic memory
28
what is procedural memory?
LTM store for our knowledge of how to do things, contains memories of our learned skills recall these memories without conscious awareness or much effort e.g driving a car
29
what is one strength of the different types of LTM? how does it show there are different types of LTM?
strength: HM and Clive Wearing episodic memory were severely damaged due to brain damage but their semantic memories were unaffected (understood meaning of words e.g HM not recalling touching a dog 30 mins earlier but did remember the concept of a dog) and their procedural memory was intact (wearing still knew how to play piano and sing) supports that there are different types of LTM
30
what is a counterpoint to the clinical evidence of the different types of LTM? how does it lack variables and limits what the CS tells us about different types of LTM?
limitation: lack of variables limits what CS can tell us abt different types of LTM researcher had no way of controlling what happened to the patient before or during the injury therefore the R has no knowledge of the individuals memory before the damage and it is difficult to judge exactly how much worse it is afterwards
31
what is one limitation of the different types of LTM? what are the conflicting research findings linking types of LTM to areas of the brain
there are conflicting research findings linking types of LTM to areas of the brain Buckner and Peterson (1996) concluded the semantic memory is located on the left side of the prefrontal cortex and episodic memory on the right but other researchers link the left prefrontal cortex with encoding of episodic melodies and the right with episodic retrieval challenging neuropsychological evidence to short toes of memory as there is poor agreement on where each type is located
32
what is another strength of the different types LTM? how does understand LTM allow psychologists to help people with memory problems?
understanding types of LTM allows psychologists to help people with memory problems belleville et al.did intervention to improve episodic memory in older people and the trained participants performed better than those w no training shows distinguishing the tween types of LTM enables specific treatments to be developed
33
what is the Working memory model and what are its components?
baddeley and hitch (1974) a representation of STM, suggests that it is a dynamic process of different types of information using subunits coordinated by a central decision making system central executive phonological loop Visio-spatial sketchpad episodic buffer
34
what is the role of the central executive?
has a ‘supervisory’ role monitors incoming data and allocates subsystems to tasks Limited capacity, does not store information
35
what is the role of the phonological loop? what it is subdivided into?
deals with auditory information (coding is acoustic) and preserves the order in which info arrives subdivided into phonological store which stores the words that you hear articulatory process which allows maintenance rehearsal (repeating words to keep them in working memory while they are needed) the capacity of the loop is 2 secs worth of what you can say
36
what is the role of the visio-spatial sketchpad ? what is it subdivided into?
stores visual and/or spatial info when required has a limited capacity which is about 3/4 objects subdivided into visual cache: stores visual data inner scribe: records the arrangement of objects in the visual field
37
what is the role of the episodic buffer?
addded in the model by baddeley in 2000 temporary store for info, integrating the visual, spatial and verbal info process by other stores and maintaining a sense of time sequencing seen as storage component of CE and has a limited capacity of 4 chunks
38
what is one strength of the WMM? how does it suggest the existence of separate visual and acoustic memory stores?
support from shallice and warrington (1970) suggests the existence of separate visual and acoustic memory stores KF poor STM ability for audio Ty info but processed visual info normal PL was damaged but VSS was still intact
39
what is another strength of the WMM? (dual task performance) how does it support the separate existence of the VSS?
supports separate existence of the VSS Baddeley carried out test: pots carried out both visual tasks the performance declined substantially as both tasks were competing for the same subsystem whereas there is no competition with a verbal and visual task together shows VSS is a separate subsystem
40
what is one limitation of the CE? how is there a lack of clarity over the nature of the CE?
lack of clarity over the nature of the CE Baddeley said it is the most important but least understood component it needs to be more clearly specified and this challenges the integrity of the WMM Can be used as evidence to explain universal results for an experiment making the results not valid as it it not known how the CE truly functions
41
what are the 2 types of interference?
proactive interference retroactive interference
42
what is proactive interference?
occurs when older memory interferes with a newer one e.g teacher has learned so many names in the past they have difficulty remembering names of their current class
43
what is retroactive interference?
when a newer memory interferes with an older one e.g teacher has learned so many new names this year, they forget the names of their old class
44
how did Mcgeoch and Donald (1931) discover that interference is worse when memories/learning are similar?
changed the amount of similarity between 2 sets of materials, pot had to learn a list of 10 words until they could remember hem with 100% accuracy, then learned a new list (6 groups learned a diff type of new lists group 1: synonyms group 2: antonyms group 3: words unrelated to the original ones group 4: consonant syllable group 5: 3 digit numbers group 6: no new list, ppts just rested (control)
45
what were the findings of Mcgeoch and Donald? (1931)
when the ppts were asked to recall the original list of words, the most similar material (synonyms) produced the worst recall showing that interference is strongest when the memories are similar could be due to PI, where the new similar information is hard to store or due to RI, new info overwrites previous similar memories
46
evaluation: (strength) how is there evidence of interference effects in more everyday situations? what does it show?
evidence of interference in more everyday situation baddeley and hitch (1977) asked rugby players to recall names of opposing teams they played number of intervening games varied but players who played the most games had the poorest recall (most interference for memory) shows interference can operate in at least some real world situations, increasing validity of the theory
47
(counterpoint for this strength) how does it suggest that most forgetting may be better explained by other theories e.g retrieval failure due to lack of cues?
it is unusual that interference may cause forgetting in everyday situations as conditions necessary for I to occur is rare in lab studies researcher can create ideal conditions for interference but in real life 2 memories have to be similar to interfere with each other (not often) shows most forgetting may be better explained by other theories e.g retrieval failure due to lack of cues
48
(limitation) how is interference temporary and overcome by using cues? what does it show?
tulving and psotka (1971) gave ppts lists of words organised into categories, one list at a time (not told what categories were) recall averaged 70% but became worse as ppts learned an additional list at end, ppts were given a cued recall test where they were told the names of the categories and recall rose agin to 70% shows that interference caused a temporary loss of accessibility to material that is still in LTM, a finding not predicted by interference theory
49
(strength) how does it show that forgetting can be due to interference?
retrograde facilitation: coenen and luijitelaar (1997) gave ppts a list of words and asked them to recall the list assuming the intervening experiences would act as interference but they found that when the words were learned under the influence of a drug diazepam, recall a week later was poor (compared with a placebo control group) when the list was learned before the drug was taken, a week later recall improved this suggests the drug prevents new information reaching part of the brain involved in processing memories so it cannot interfere retroactively with info already stored shows forgetting can be due to interference - reduce interference and forgetting is reduced as well
50
what is retrieval failure?
a form of forgetting where it occurs when we don't have the necessary cues to access memory
51
what does the encoding specificity principle state? what happens if the cues available at encoding and retrieval are different?
a cue has to be both present at encoding (when we learn material) present at retrieval (when recalled) there will be some forgetting
52
what is context-dependent forgetting?
recall depends on external cue (weather or place)
53
what is state-dependent forgetting?
recall depends on internal cue (feeling drunk/upset)
54
how was context-dependent forgetting researched? Godden and baddeley (1975)
Godden and baddeley (1975) studied deep-sea divers who work underwater to see if training on land hindered or helped their work underwater learned a list of words under one of 4 conditions learn on land - recall on land learn on land - recall underwater learn underwater - recall underwater learn underwater - recall on land
55
what were the findings and conclusions of the context dependent forgetting research?
accurate recall was 40% lower in the non-matching conditions, concluding that the external cues available at learning were different from the ones available at recall which led to retrieval failure
56
how was state-dependent forgetting researched? carter and cassaday (1998)
carter and cassaday (1998) gave antihistamine drug to their ppts which had a mild sedative effect making the ppts slightly drowsy (created an internal physiological state different from the normal state of being awake and alert learnt a list of words under one of 4 conditions learn on drug - recall off drug learn on drug - recall on drug learn off drug - recall off drug learn off drug - recall on drug
57
what were the findings and conclusions of the state dependent forgetting research?
in the conditions where there was a mismatch between internal state at learning and recall, performance on memory test was significantly worse when cues are absent then tere is more forgetting
58
eval: (strength) how can retrieval cues help us to overcome some forgetting in everyday situations?
Baddeley suggests that when we have trouble remembering something, it is worth making the effort to recall the environment that we learned it in first (e.g forgetting why u went to a different room and when u go back to the first room, u remember) shows how research can remind us of strategies we use in real world to improve our recall
59
eval: (strength) what is the research that support the retrieval failure explanation?
Godden + Baddeley, Carter + Cassaday studies show that a lack of relevant cues at recall can lead to context-dependent and state-dependent forgetting in everyday life Eysenk and Keane (2010) argue that retrieval failure is the main reason for forgetting from LTM evidence shows that retrieval failure occurs in real world situations as well as highly controlled conditions of the lab
60
eval: what is the counterpoint for this research that supports the retrieval failure explanation?
Baddeley (1997) argues that context effects are no that strong as different contexts have to be very different before an effect is seen. (hard to find an environment as different as land and underwater, in contrast = learning smth in one room and recalling it in another will not lead to much forgetting as the environments are not different enough) meaning retrieval failure due to lack of contextual cues may not actually explain much everyday forgetting
61
eval: (limitation) how do context effects depend substantially on the type of memory being tested
Godden + Baddeley (1980) replicated teir underwater experiment but used a recognition test instead of recall when recognition was tested there was no contxext dependent effect so performance was the same in all conditions this suggests that retrieval failure is a limited explanation for forgetting because it only applies when a person has to recall info rather than recognise it
62
What is eyewitness testimony?
the ability of people to remember the details of events which they themselves have observed
63
what is misleading information?
incorrect info given to an eyewitness usually after the event can take many forms e.g leading questions/ post-event discussion
64
what is a leading question?
a question which because of the way it is phrased, suggests a certain answer e.g "was the knife in his left hand?" leads a person to think thats where the knife was
65
what was the research done on leading questions?
loftus and palmer (1974) 45 participants (students) in 5 groups Participants were asked to watch film clips of car accidents and then they were asked questions about the accident that they had seen In the ‘critical questions’ (a leading question or a misleading question),the participants were asked to describe how fast the cars were travelling Each group was given a different verb in the question (eg hit, contacted, bumped, collided and smashed)
66
what were the findings of the research on leading questions?
The mean estimated speed was calculated for each participant group When the verb ‘contacted’ was used the speed that they estimated was 31.8 mph, however when the verb ‘smashed’ was used, the mean was 40.5 mph shows the leading question biased the eyewitness's recall of an event
67
why do leading questions affect EWT?
The response-bias explanation suggests that the wording of the question has no real effect on the participants’ memories. With words such as ‘smash’,it encouraged the participants to say that the collision was at a faster speed. loftus and palmer (1974) Conducted a second experiment, Supported the ‘substitution explanation’- suggests that the wording of the leading question changes the participants memory of the clip The ‘critical verb’ altered their memory of the crash
68
what is meant by post-event discussion?
occurs when there is more than one witness to an event, where they discuss what they have seen with each other which may influence the accuracy of each witness's recall of the event
69
what was the research done on post-event discussion?
Fiona Gabbert et al. (2003) studied participants in pairs, where each watched a video of the same crime but filmed from different POV’s. This meant that each participant could see elements in the event that the other could not E.g only one participant could see the title of the book a women was carrying Both participants then discussed what they had seen before individually completing a test of recall
70
what were the findings of the research done on post-event discussion?
71% of participants mistakenly recalled elements of the video that they did not see in the video but had picked up in discussion. The corresponding figure in a control group, where there was no discussion, was 0% —> evidence of memory conformity
71
why does post-event discussion affect EWT?
- memory contamination: When co-witnesses to a crime discuss it with each other, the eyewitness testimonies may become altered or distorted . This is because they combine (mis)information from other witnesses with their own memories. - memory conformity: Gabbert et al. concluded witnesses often go along with each other, either to win social approval or because they believe the other witnesses are right and they are wrong. Unlike memory contamination, the actual memory is unchanged.
72
eval: (strength) how does misleading information have important practical uses in the criminal justice system?
As the consequences of inaccurate EWT can be serious, loftus (1975) believes that leading questions have such a distorting effect on memory that police officers need to be careful on how their questions are phrased psychologists sometimes are asked to act as expert witness in court trails and explain the limits of EWT to juries shows that psychologists can help to improve the way the legal system works especially by protecting innocent people from faulty convictions based on unreliable EWT
73
What is a counterpoint for this strength? how does it show that EWT may be more dependable than studies suggest?
practical applications may be affected by issues with research e.g loftus and palmer ppts watched film clips in a lab, different from witnessing real events (less stressful) Rachel foster et al. point out that what eyewitnesses remember has important consequences in the real world, but ppts responses in research do not matter the same way ( so research ppts are less motivated to be accurate) suggests that researches such as loftus are too pessimistic about the effects of misleading information and EWT may be more dependable than studies suggest
74
(limitation of substitution expanation) how is EWT more accurate for some aspects of an event than others?
Sutherland and Hayne (2011) showed ppts a video clip and when ppts were later asked misleading questions, their recall was more accurate for central details of the event than for peripheral ones (their attention was focused on central features of the event and these memories were relatively resistant to misleading information) suggests that original memories for central details survived and were not distorted, an outcome that is not predicted by the substitution explanation
75
(limitation of memory conformity) what is the evidence that post-event discussion actually alters EWT?
skagerberg and wright (2008) showed their ppts film clips (2 versions: e.g a mugger's hair was dark brown in one but light brown in the other) ppts discussed the clips in pairs, each seeing diff versions, they often did not report what they had seen but a blend of the two (e.g common answer was medium brown, not light or dark) suggests that the memory itself is distorted through contamination by misleading post-event discussion rather than a result of memory conformity
76
what is anxiety?
a state of emotional and physical arousal emotions include having worried thoughts and feelings of tension physical changes = increased heart rate and sweatiness
77
what was the aim of johnson and scott's (1976) research on anxiety?
johnson and scott (1976) did research on how the presence of weapon creates anxiety and this leads to a focus o the weapon, reducing a witness's recall for other details in the event
78
how does anxiety have a negative effect on recall? (due to weapon focus)
Johnson and scott's (1976) ppts believed they were participating in a lab study ppts in a waiting room in the low anxiety condition: saw a man walk past with grease on his hands carrying a pen in the high anxiety condition: overheard a heated argument, the sound of glass breaking and saw a man holding a knife covered in blood
79
what were the findings of the experiment done on how anxiety has a negative effect on recall?
ppts later picked out the man from a set of 50 photos 49% who saw the man carrying the pen were able to identify him, whereas only 33% saw the man with the bloody knife the tunnel theory of memory argues that people have enhanced memory for central events and weapon focus as a result of anxiety can have this effect
80
what was the experiment conducted on how anxiety has a positive effect on recall?
anxiety triggers the fight/flight response, increasing alertness and may improve memory yuille and cutshall (1986) conducted a study of an actual shooting in a gun shop in vancouver canada where he owner shot a thief dead 13/21 witnesses took part and were interviewed 4-5 months later and compared to original police intervews at the time accuracy was determined by how many details were recalled and also were asked to rate how stressed they were on a 7 point scale
81
what were the findings of the experiment conducted on how anxiety has a positive effect on recall?
witnesses were v accurate although some details were less accurate such as recollection of colour items and age/height/weight estimates the ppts that ere the most stressed were most accurate (88% compared t less stressed 75%) suggests that anxiety does not have a detrimental effect on the accuracy of EWT
82
how can the contradictory findings of anxiety's effect on recall be explained?
yerkes-dodson law (inverted U) when witnessing a crime, we experince anxiety (emotional) and fight/flight response lower levels of A = lower levels of recall accuracy, the memory becomes mor accurate as level of A increases but there is an optimum level of A, where if a person experiences more arousal/anxiety, recall declines
83
(limitation of the study done on weapon focus) how did the study not test for anxiety?
reason why ppts may have been focused on the weapon was because of UNUSUALNESS as they were surprised and not scared pickel (1998) conducted an experiment using scissors, handgun, wallet, raw chicken in a hairdressing salon (scissors = high anxiety low unusualness) eyewitness accuracy was significantly poorer in high unusualness suggesting weapon focus effect is due to unusualness rather than anxiety/threat
84
(Strength for negative effects) what is the evidence supporting the view that anxiety has the negative effect on the accuracy of recall?
valentine and mesout (2009) supports the research on weapon focus researchers used heart rate (objective measure) to divide ppts into high anxiety and low anxiety groups in this study anxiety disrupted the ppts' ability to recall details about the actor in the london dungeon labyrinth (17% of high anxiety group identified correctly, 75% correct identification by the low anxiety group) suggests high level of anxiety does have an negative effect on the immediate EW recall of a stressful event
85
(strength for positive effects) what is the evidence that anxiety can have a positive effect on the accuracy of recall
christianson and hubinette interviewed 58 witnesses to actual bank robberies in sweden some witnesses were directly involved (bank workers) others were indirectly (bystanders) it was assumed that those directly involved would experience the most anxiety but recall was more than 75% accurate across all witnesses, direct victims, most anxious, were more accurate findings form actual crimes confirm that anxiety does not reduce the accuracy of recall from eyewitnesses and may even enhance it
86
what is cognitive interview? what are the 4 stages of CI?
a method of interviewing eyewitnesses to help them retrieve more accurate memories 1. REPORT EVERYTHING witnesses are encouraged to include every single detail as it may be important and trigger other memories 2. REINSTATE THE CONTEXT witness should return to the original crime scene in their mind and imagine the environment and their emotions (related to context-dependent forgetting) 3. REVERSE THE ORDER events should be recalled in a different order, which is done t prevent the report their expectations of how the event must have happened and prevents dishonesty 4. CHANGE PERSPECTIVE witnesses should recall the incident from another perspective, done to disrupt the effect of expectations and the effect of schema (generates the expectations of what would have happened and is recalled instead of actual events)
87
what is the enhanced CI?
fisher et al. developed additional elements: interviewer needs to know when to establish eye contact and when to relinquish it includes: minimising distractions, getting witness to speak slowly, asking open-ended questions
88
(strength) what is evidence that the CI works?
meta-analysis done by köhnken et al. (1999) combined data from 55 studies comparing the CI with the standard police interview CI gave 41% increase in accurate info compared w the standard shows that the CI is an effective technique in helping witnesses to recall info that is stored in memory but not immediately accessible
89
what is a counterpoint for this strength?
köhnken et al. found an increase in the amount of inaccurate info recalled by ppts cognitive interview may sacrifice quality of EWT (accuracy) in favour of quantity (amount of details) means police officers should treat eyewitnesses evidence from CI
90
(limitation of the original CI) how are not all of its elements are equally effective or useful?
Milne and Bull (2002) found that each of the 4 techniques alone produced more info than the standard interview found that a combination of REPORT EVERYTHING and REINSTATE THE CONTEXT produced better recall confirmed police officers' suspicions that some aspects of the CI are more useful than others casts some doubt on the credibility of the overall CI
91
(limitation) how is the CI time-consuming?
police officers may be reluctant as it takes more time and training this suggests that the complete CI is not a realistic method and it is better to focus on just a few key elements
92
93
94