Memory Flashcards
memory A01 summary
The differences between ST and LT memory
The differences between ST and LT memory
Duration
STM – Peterson and Peterson, consonant syllables, Up to 18 seconds
LTM – Bahrick, year books, up to 48 years
Capacity
STM – Jacobs – 9.3 and 7.3, Miller – 7+/-2, Cowan – 4 chunks
Encoding
STM and LTM – Baddeley – STM is acoustic and LTM is semantic
The multi-store model of memory A01 summary
The multi-store model of memory
Description
- 3 stores – SS, STM and LTM
- SS – v.large capacity, encoded by senses, less than 1 second duration
- STM – acoustically encoded, 7+/-2 capacity and up to 18 seconds duration
- Information flows in a linear fashion
- Input comes in from the environment to the SS, you must pay attention for it to transfer to the
STM, you must do maintenance rehearsal to keep in the STM and you must do elaborative
rehearsal to transfer to LTM
The Working Memory Model A01 summary
The Working Memory Model
Description
- 5 stores – Central executive, episodic buffer, visual spatial sketchpad (slave system), phonological
loop (slave system) and the LTM
- Central executive is in control of your attention
- Visual spatial sketchpad is responsible for visual and spatial tasks
- Phonological loop is responsible for verbal and acoustic tasks
- Episodic buffer is extra storage that integrates information
- It’s difficult to do two tasks at the same time requiring the same slave system
Types of LTM a01 summary
Types of LTM
- Procedural – Memory for skills
- Episodic – Memory for events
- Semantic – Memory for facts/knowledge
Evidence for their existence – Tulving – brain scans study, Clive Wearing case study
A01 summary Interference Theory
Interference Theory Description
- Forgetting occurs because of interference
-Two pieces of information conflict with one another
-More likely if the information is similar
-Two types
-proactive (old takes new) and retroactive (new takes old)
a01 summary Retrieval Failure Theory
Retrieval Failure Theory Description
- Tulving
- Forgetting is due to an absence of cues
- Encoding specificity principle
– cues present at encoding (learning) need to be present at retrieval
- Two types of cues
– state dependent (physical and psychological) and context dependent (environmental)
a01 summary Misleading Information
Misleading Information
Loftus and Palmer
– Leading Questions
- 45 students
- Watched clips of a car crash
- Answered a critical question
– ‘How fast were the cars going…’
- 5 key words
– smashed, contacted, collided, bumped, hit
- Found the highest speeds reported were in the smashed condition
Gabbert
– Post-event discussion
- Pairs of participants
- Watched a video of a crime from different perspectives
- Afterwards discussed what they had seen
- 71% reported inaccuracies
- Compared to 0% in the control group
Anxiety A01/A03 summary (can be used as either)
Anxiety
- Deffenbacher – increased anxiety links to inaccurate EWT controlled studies ecological validity
- Yuille and Cutshall – Canada, gun shop robbery, increased anxiety links to more accurate EWT (weapon focus effect)
ecological validity extraneous variables - Johnson and Scott – waiting room, man with pen and grease, blood and knife – increased anxiety condition lead to more inaccuracies ecological validity Ethics
Cognitive Interview Description A01
Cognitive Interview Description
- Police interview technique
- 4 stages
– report everything, mentally reinstate the context, change the order, change the perspective - Different routes lead to more accurate memories