Memory - 04 Explanations for forgetting Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are 2 types of forgetting?

A

1)interference
2)retrieval failure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is interference?

A

happened when one memory disrupts the ability to remember another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two types of interference?

A

1)proactive interference
2)retroactive interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is proactive interference?

A

-forwards
-proactive interference occurs when an older memory interferes with a newer memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is retroactive interference?

A

-backwards
-retroactive interference occurs when a new memory prevents the recall of an older memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When is interference most likely to occur?

A

when memories are similar for example phone numbers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is retrieval failure?

A

-occurs when a memory is available but not accessible unless a suitable cue is provided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a cue?

A

a trigger or information that allows us to access a memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If a cue is to help us remember information when does it need to be present?

A

at coding (when we learn it) and at retrieval (when we are recalling it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Research support for proactive interference (Keppel and Underwood)

A

-p’s recall trigrams after intervals where they counted backwards in threes
-forgetting increased after each interval, little forgetting occurred at start
-earlier trigrams entered LTM and interfered with formation of new memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Research support for retroactive interference (Muller)

A

-p’s learning list of syllables, given intervening task between exposure and recall
-intervening task produced retroactive interference, p’s struggled to recall lists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Weakness of interference theory (lab setting)

A

-lacks ecological validity and also mundane realism as tasks are rarely indicative of what people would experience in real life
-makes it difficult to generalise to real life or understand how much day-to-day forgetting can be credited to interference or even forgetting in general

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Weakness of interference theory (individual differences)

A

-individual differences, some people are less affected by proactive interference compared to others
-Kane et al (2000), people with bigger working memory spans were less susceptible to proactive interference
-highlights how interference theories cannot be fully generalised to everyone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

strength of interference theory (real world application)

A

-can help with marketing campaigns
-Danaher et al (2008), people exposed to ads from competing brands within short time frame p’s struggled to recognise brands/messages
-so ads should be spaced far apart from rivals and repeated more than once a day to help avoid dilution of adverts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Weakness of interference theory (only explains forgetting when information is similar)

A

-cannot explain why forgetting occurs in the majority of real life situations when information is not similar
-only one part of a bigger explanation and is over-simplified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly