Media - Topic 5 Flashcards
A media text
Any media product which describes,defines or represents something, such as a movie or video
Polysemic
Means that a media text can be interpreted in different ways by different people
Methodological problems of researching media effects
It’s practically impossible to establish what people’s beliefs, values and behaviour might have been without any media influence
E.g. Neo-marxists like GMG argue that the media encourages audiences to accept the cultural hegemony of the dominant class
Media effects the models
Based around 2 key and related questions:
1. How passive or active are the audiences? - are the passive ‘dopes’ mindlessly consuming media texts who accept everything the media throws at them, or do they actively interpret and criticize media texts
2. How powerful are the media in affecting audiences? - how influential are the media if at all, compared to other influences on audience behaviour, such as their own experiences or the influences of other agencies
The hypodermic syringe model
Suggest the media act like a syringe, injecting media texts into the ‘veins’ of media audiences.
Audiences are seeing as unthinking, passive receivers of media texts.
The media messages fill audiences with dominant ideologies then immediately acts on the messages
What does Dworkin say about the hypodermic syringe model
Radical feminists - it’s what lies behind moral panics over the effects of the media on behaviour and it was the model sometimes used to partly explain the Tottenham/London riots in August 2011
AO3 criticisms of the hypodermic syringe model
- The model assumes the entire audience is passive and will react in the same way to media content
- It assumes the media have enormous power and influence
Active audiences
They see the media as less influential than the passive audience approach of the hypodermic syringe model
They believe audiences vary in terms of social characteristics like age,class etc
These factors will influence their choices in the way they use the media, what they use them for and the ways they interpret media texts
The two-step flow model (Katz and Lazarsfeld)
This model suggests that the media still have quite strong effects on audiences, but they do not simply passively and directly react to media content and will respond in a variety of ways to it.
The opinion leaders select, interpret and filter media texts before they reach mass audiences (first step)
Opinion leaders selectively pass on these messages from interpretations from audiences from first step (second step)
This model recognizes that media audiences are social groups which people belong to
Opinion leaders
Within the social networks to which audiences belong
Those respected members of any social group who get information and form views from the media who lead opinion and discussion in their social groups
AO3 criticisms of the two-step flow model
- It suggests that people are very vulnerable to influence and manipulation by opinion leaders
- With the rise of the new media and social networking sites, the role of opinion leaders may be less influential
The cultural effects model - the ‘drip drip’ effect (neo-marxist)
Suggest that the media do have an effect on the audience. However it does not regard media audiences as simply passive consumers of media texts
Neo-marxists and cultural effects model
Theory recognizes that the media are owned and heavily influenced by the dominant and most powerful groups in society and their interests strongly influence the content of the media
Accept that audiences interpret the media they consume and may respond in different ways depending on their social characteristics e.g. class, gender
Further information on the cultural effects model
Suggests the media gradually influence the audience over a period of time - a sort of slow, drip-drip effect. A process of brainwashing which gradually shapes people’s taken-for-granted common-sense ideas and assumptions
Encoding/Decoding and reception analysis
How audiences receive and interpret media texts and therefore what effects they have on audiences
Hall (Encoding/Decoding)
Content of the media messages such as TV and current affairs programs are ‘encoded’ by those who produce them, they contain a particular intended meaning which they expect media audiences to believe
Encoding - the dominant hegemonic viewpoint which takes the dominant ideology for granted and accepts it as the norm
What does Hall continue to say about encoding/decoding
Most audiences will receive and interpret or decode media texts containing this dominant hegemonic viewpoint in the way they were intended or encoded
Other audiences may decide or interpret the same media texts differently, relating to their social situations
What did Morley find
Suggested people might read, or decode and interpret media texts in one of 3 ways based on their knowledge and social group:
1. a preferred reading
2. a negotiated reading
3. an oppositional reading
1) A preferred reading
Where audiences read or decide media texts in the way that those producing media content intended, and which they would prefer their audiences to believe
- A negotiated reading
One in which media audiences generally accept the preferred or dominant meaning of a media text, but amend it to some extent
- An oppositional reading
Which media audiences oppose or reject the preferred or dominant of media content
Selective filtering - an interpretivist approach (Klapper)
People have experiences of their own, make choices and interpret and filter what they read, see or hear in the media
3 filters that Klapper said people apply in their approaches to and interpretations of the media
- Selective exposure
- Selective perception
- Selective retention
- Selective exposure
People must first choose what they wish to watch, read or listen to in the media and they only choose media messages which fit in with their existing views and interests
E.g. they might refuse to watch a programme exposing alleged benefit fraudsters