Media representations Flashcards

1
Q

case study?

A

the Simpsons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

omission point

A
  • underepresentation of the w/c
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

omission evidence

A

Create London
- found 12% of people working in TV, film or radio = w/c
- those from elite backgrounds -> portray w/c negatively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

omission analysis

A

BBC 2023
- found w/c people believed the media doesnt represent them and where they live
- lack of w/c in BBC workforce = underrepresentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

omission evaluation

A

Tuchman
- symbolic annhilation
- omission+condemnation+trivialisation = excludes the working class and reinforces class divisions of capitalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

trivialisation and condemnation evidence

A

Butsch
- stupid clown stereotype = uintelligent
- comic entertainment = for humour
- reinforces opression of the w/c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

trivialisation and condemnation analysis

A

Jones
- individualisation - poverty and hardships of the w/c are explained through the poor decisions made by them
- welfare dependency - media represents the w/c as lazy bcs theyre unemployed -> myth of meritocracy , m/c work harder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

trivialisation and condemnation evaluation

A

hooks
- intersectionlaity
- those who experience multiple forms of opression tend to be condemned+trivialised more badly in the media or not at all

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

new media evidence

A

cultural optomist - Mcnair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

new media analysis

A

cultural pessimist - Aral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

new media evaluation

A

neo-marxist Fuchs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

omission evidence ethnicity

A
  • Creative Diversity Network (2021) found only 6.5% of media writers are ethnic minorities
  • underrepresented in media content
  • white people will portray ethnic minorities negatively.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

omission analysis ethnicity

A
  • Ofcom research from 2018 found ethnic minorities in the UK were underrepresented in BBC2 characters by around 3%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

condemnation and trivialisation evidence ethnicity

A
  • Communications Research Group (2001) found 24%of ethnic minority in popular TV were about musical performances or other entertainment, compared with only 11% of white people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

condemnation and trivialisation analysis ethnicity

A
  • Cushion analysed newspapers television news and radio news over a 16 week period
  • found nearly 70% of stories were related to violent gang crime by young black men.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

omission women evidence

A
  • Lauzen found 24% of key behind-the-scenes roles of the top 250 films of the year were done by women
  • media represents women in negative ways
17
Q

omission women analysis

A
  • Lauzen found only 34% of speaking characters in the top 250 US films were women
  • exclusion of women in production means there isn’t anyone interested in gender inequality and creating positive portrayals of women. - Films with women directors or writers were 33% more likely to have women protagonists
  • shows how the inclusion of women in production improves representation in content.
18
Q

condemnation and trivialisation women evidence

A
  • Geena Davis Institute (2014) found women were four times more likely to be in revealing clothing or completely naked in media content
  • corresponds to a ‘sex object’ stereotype - women’s role in media is to provide sexual entertainment
19
Q

condemnation and trivialisation women analysis

A
  • Malkin (2005) describes a “damsel in distress syndrome”
  • women are shown without free will, awaiting a male savour
  • the media portray women as victims requiring men to save them
20
Q

omission of LGBTQ+ evidence

A
  • historically LGBTQ+ were omitted from the media
  • (NCTJ) ‘Diversity in Journalism’ (2023) report revealed 11% of journalists identify LGBTQ+ compared to around 3% of the population
21
Q

omission of LGBTQ+ analysis

A
  • Gill (2007) argues homosexuality is omitted through a process of ‘sanitisation’ which removes the sexuality of LGBTQ+ people. - For example, gay men are rarely portrayed in a sexualised way
22
Q

condemnation and trivialisation LGBTQ+ evidence

A
  • Ridge (2021) found the media blamed the AIDS crisis on the sexuality of LGBTQ+ people, rather than the UK Government who failed to deal with a health emergency.
23
Q

condemnation and trivialisation LGBTQ+ analysis

A
  • Russel Hoffman (2011) found the gay best friend stereotype in the media shows them as sidekick, rather than a protagonist.
  • provides entertainment for a heterosexual main character.
24
Q

omission disability evidence

A
  • OFCOM (2023) found only 10% of media workers are disabled, compared to around 24% of the UK population.
25
Q

omission disability analysis

A
  • Diversity in the UK (2022) found the UK’s top TV shows found only 1.6% of characters had a disability
  • lack of disabled people in the media means there is a lack of people who understand what its like to live with disabilities
26
Q

condemnation and trivialisation disability evidence

A
  • Cumberbatch and Negrine found disabled people are condemned through a stereotype of criminality
  • blames disabled people rather than a society that discriminates against disabled people
27
Q

condemnation and trivialisation analysis

A
  • Cumberbatch and Negrine found disabled people are trivialised through a ‘subhuman’ stereotype.
  • represented as fools/idiots with audiences enjoying their lack of intelligence or physicality