MCQs Key PApers Flashcards

1
Q

With regards to Nurses HEalth Study, all statements below are true EXCEPT:
A) was a large (>80,000 women), retrospective cohort study that looked at modifiable lifestyle risk factors at first diagnosis of fatal or non fatal MI
B) studied a number of risk factors for chronic disease, including assessment of nutritional quality of subject’s diet, which was ranked and stratified into quintiles
C) concluded that “Among women, adherence to lifestyle guidelines involving diet, exercise, and abstinence from smoking is associated with a very low risk of coronary heart disease.”
D) nutrients used to assess the nutritional quality of subject’s diet included: high fiber, high marine omega 3s and folate; this data was used to calculate diet score, based on this score the top 40% of women were found to have the lowest risk of CVD
E) Results showed that there was incremental risk of CV events for each low-risk factor added

A

answer: A, F
A) FALSE: it was a PROSPECTIVE study - at baseline subjects had to be free of CVD, DM, cancer; 14 years follow up;
b) TRUE: other modifiable risk factors studied were: smoking, normal BMI (<25), moderate alcohol consumption (5-30g or 1/5to 1oz/day), other nutrients considered: high polyunsat. to ssaturated fats ratio, lower glycemic load
c) TRUE (Stampfer 200)
E) TRUE: more risk factors = higher risk; 3 risk factors =51% PAR, 4 RF = 50% PAR, 5 RF= 74%PAR (PAR = population attributable risk= incidence of a dis in the poppn. that would be eliminated if exposure were eliminated):

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

With regards to Nurse’s HEalth Study 1 and 2 AND Health Professionals Follow-up Study, all statements below are true, EXCEPT:
A) very large sets of longitudinal data were analyzed and resulted in many papers, including several nested-in studies, such as the one by Pan et al 2011 on association of red meat and t2dm
B) Results showed that the amount of fruit and vegetables consumed did not make statistically significant difference to CVD risk
C) found that all red meat but particularly processed red meat increased the risk of t2d: every 100g of unprocessed red meat had increased risk of t2d 1.2 times every 50g of processed red meat increased risk of t2d 1.5 times
D) substituting nuts and seeds for red meat showed greater risk reduction than substituting wholegrain cereal

A

answer: B, D
A) true (37,083 men in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (1986–2006), 79,570 women in the Nurses’ Health Study I (1980–2008), and 87,504 women in the Nurses’ Health Study II (1991–2005); more than 4 million person-years of follow-up
B)FALSE: EACH DAILY SERVING OF FRUIT AND VEG DECR THE CVD RISK BY 4% (RR 0.96, p<0.01 FOR TREND)
C) TRUE After adjustment for age, BMI, and other lifestyle and dietary risk factors, both unprocessed and processed red meat intakes were positively associated with T2D risk in each cohort (all P-trend <0.001). The pooled HRs (95% CIs) for a one serving/d increase in unprocessed, processed, and total red meat consumption were 1.12 (1.08, 1.16), 1.32 (1.25, 1.40), and 1.14 (1.10, 1.18), respectively. The results were confirmed by a meta-analysis: 442,101 participants and 28,228 diabetes cases): the RRs (95% CIs) were 1.19 (1.04, 1.37) and 1.51 (1.25, 1.83) for 100 g unprocessed red meat/d and for 50 g processed red meat/d, respectively.
D) FALSE (processed meat substitution w/ nuts = appx 30% reduction, wholegrain appx 35% reduction)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

With regards to Nurse’s HEalth Study 1 and 2 AND Health Professionals Follow-up Study, all statements below are true, EXCEPT:
A) substitution of meat for non-meat alternatives, such as nuts, legumes, whole grain, low fat dairy, poultry and fish, resulted in reduced risk of mortality for all substitution groups
B) unsaturated fats, especially PUFAs, and/or high-quality carbohydrates can be used to replace saturated fats to reduce CHD risk
C) isocaloric substitution of saturated fats with refined starches/ added sugars had no effect on reduction of risk in cvd, with very strong statistical significance
D) replacing (isocaloric) SFA’s with PUFAs, MUFAs and wholegrain cereal all showed risk reduction of CHD and were all statistically significant
E) quality of carbohydrates has no effect on CHD risk
F) transfats raised the risk, comp to SFAs

A

Answer: C, E
A) TRUE (Pan et al. AnIntMed2012)
B) TRUE (Li et al. JACC 2015): 20% risk reduction in CVD was observed when the highest quintile of PUFAS intake was compared with lowest quintile quintile ; NB high quality carbs = provident from wholefood
C) False: p <0.1
D) TRUE (PUFAS 25% reduction, p<0.001, MUFAs 15% reduction p<0.02, wholegrain 9% reduction p<0.01)
E) FALSE: highest quintile wholegrain vs lowest quintile 10% risk reduction (0.003), refined startches and sugars no effect on risk (see answer C)
F) TRUE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

With regards to Ornish Heart Study (Ornish 1990, 1998), choose the CORRECT statement(s):
A) major weakness of the study is that there was no control group and no blinding
B) it was a cross sectional study
C) the intervention was Intensive Lifestyle Intervention Program, consisting of: low fat (10% Kcal), vegetarian diet, aerobic exercise, smoking cessation, stress management, group psychosocial support and statin
D) outcome measures included: angiography, lipids and other biomarkers, medication dosing, self-reported adherence
E) 1 year results were published in JAMA in 1990 and 5year results were published in the same journal in 1998

A

answer: D
A) FALSE: 48 subjects (on waiting list for surgical intervention w/ moderate coronary stenosis); randomised into INTERVVENTION (28): Intensive Lisfestyle Intervention; CONTROL(40): usual AHA counselling re diet and exercise; BLINDING: blinded quantitative angiography
B) FALSE: quantitative angio at baseline, at 1 year and at 5 years
C) FALSE: NO LIPID LOWERING MEDS used in intervention gp.
D) TRUE
E) TRUE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

With regards to Ornish Heart Study , choose the CORRECT statement(s):

A) 5-year results showed: almost 8% mean reduction in stenoses in the intervention group and almost 30% mean reduction in the control group overall
B) subset of control group patients that were not on any lipid lowering medications serves as a better comparison to the intervention group, where no medications were used. This subset showed an impressive 46% relative increase in stenoses at 5 years
C) control group had almost 30% increase in extent of stenoses and appx 2.5x increased risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiac events compared to intervention group
D) dose-response association between adherence to program and regression of stenoses was observed, (82% of experimental gr. showing regression)
E) Most change happened in the first year of intervention, as it was hard for the experimental group to adhere to the program long-term, at five years the gap between the intervention group and control group closed in

A

A) FALSE - reduction in the intervention gp vs increase in stenoses in the control group
B) TRUE
C) TRUE
D) TRUE
E) FALSE: more regression of CAD occured after 5 years compared to after 1 year => intervention continued effect; control gp continued progression of stenoses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Below are examples of key studies demonstrating benefits of LS interventions compared to conventional approaches. Match studies with their results (e.g. A-2):
A) National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) showed 58% effective vs medication 31%
B) ) Exercise vs PTCA (percutaneous coronary angioplasty): exercise = 26% better survival
C) Safer control of biomarkers (e.g. cholesterol) PORTFOLIO diet () equivalent cholesterol control to low dose SEs without side effects
D) appx 8% reduction of coronary stenosis with ITLC (intensive LS change) program vs increase in stenosis with standard AHA approach & 2.5% increase of risk for fatal and non-fatal cardiac events with standard AHA approach compared to ITLC at 5 y follow up

1) Jenkins, JAMA 2002
2) Knowler, NEMJ 2002
3) Hambrecht, Circulation 2004
4) Ornish, JAMA 1998

A
answer: 
A-2
B-3
C-1
D-4
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

With regards to Jenkin’s 2003 PORTFOLIO diet study, choose all CORRECT statements:
A) its small size and short duration of follow up are some of its main shortfalls
B) it is the first study to demonstrate that diet is better than statins in lowering cholesterol
C) statins and diet had very similar effects in terms of latency and size of effect (lowering cholesterol)
D) PORTFOLIO diet was high in: plants high in sterols, omega-3-rich, oily fish, wholegrains

A

ANSWER: A, C
A) TRUE: only 46 subjects, randomised into 3 groups, 1 month follow up , N=16 on PORTFOLIO DIET
B) FALSE: very similar effect (see answ C)
C) TRUE; appx 2 weeks from initiation to drop in levels, 30% drop in LDL in diet gp, 28% drop in statin gp (8% drop in control)
D) FALSE: high sterol plants, soy protein, viscous fibers, almonds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Below are examples of key studies demonstrating benefits of LS interventions compared to conventional approaches. Match studies with their results (e.g. A-2):

A) Showed that dietary energy restriction can reverse the abnormalities underlying T2D (normalisation of beta-cell function and hepatic insulin sensitivity, as well as lowered hepatic and pancreatic fat infiltration)

B) Was one of the first studies that concluded that ITLC may modulate gene expression in the prostate, the 5-y follow up study showed that ITLC resulted in sustained increased telomere length

C) Compared ILI (Intensive Lifestyle Intervention) with a Diabetes Support and Education (DSE) intervention and showed that intensive lifestyle intervention achieved better rates of T2D remission compared to conventional education program. Improved remission rates were sustained up to 4 years after the intervention. However, the absolute number of t2d remissions was modest.

D) Compared 4 of the most popular approaches to weight loss and concluded that adherence to a program is more important than the diet consumed

1) “LOOK AHEAD” Study, Gregg et al, Jama 2012
2) “GEMINAL” study, Ornish et al, Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2008
3) Dansinger, JAMA 2005
4) “COUTNERPOINT” STUDY: Lim et al, Diabetologica 2011

A
answer: 
A- 4
B-2
C-1
D-3
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

All of the studies below are examples of delivering ITLCs, EXCEPT:
A) CHIP program (Aldana, JOEM 2005)
B) DASH diet (Appel, NEJM 1997)
C) Lifestyle Heart Trial (ORnish, Lancet 1990, JAMA 1998)
D) PORTFOLIO diet (Jenkins, JAMA 2003)
E) COUNTERPOINT Study (Lim Diabetologia 2011)
F) GEMINAL study (Ornish et al, Proc Natl Sci USA 2008)
G) DIETFITS rct (gaRDNER JAMA 2018)

A

answer: D, G, E (both diet only)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

With regards to the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) (Knowler NEJM 2002), all below is true EXCEPT:
A) it was a large prospective study, where healthy subjects were followed for 14 years to identify risk factors for T2D
B) the study ended early because of its dramatic results; it showed that
C) the effects of metformin on prevention of diabetes in pre-diabetic subjects were similar to the lifestyle intervention
D) ITLC was found more beneficial than metformin to slow down T2D in subjects with IGT
E) clearly showed that ITLC is superior to medication in slowing the progress of IGT to T2D, however long term benefits require further evaluation

A

answer: A, C
A) FALSE: large (3234 prediabetic subjects); randomised, multicentre study: 3 randomised groups: 1. metformin, 2. placebo, 3. ITLC; goals 1: 7% or > wt loss, 2. >150min/week or more physical activity;
1ry outcome = incidence of T2D at the end of follow up period; follow up period = 2.8 years
B) TRUE: study was planned to go for 4 years, however both intervention arms (Met, ITLC) showed dramatic improvement in IGT => it was considered unethical for the study to continue; MET reduced incidence by 31%, ITLC by 58% compared to placebo
C) FALSE: ITLC was appx twice as effective as metformin: NNT over 3 years for ITLC was 6.9 (7), NNT for metformin over 3 years was 13.9(14) => to prevent one case of diabetes over 3 years, 6.9 people would need to participate in ITLC, or 13.9 would need to take metformin
D) TRUE (see above- half NNT vs metformin, half incidence at 3 years, lower incidence at 4y)
E) TRUE, NB: further analysis at 4 y. (planned end point) showed that effects continued at 4 years (cumulative incidence Plac 37%, MET 29%, ITLC 20%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

With regards to Hambrecht 2004 study: Percutaneous coronary angioplasty PCI) vs exercise in patients with stable coronary artery disease, all below is true EXCEPT:
A) compared the effects of exercise vs stenting in people with known, stable coronary artery disease on a battery of measures, including clinical, functional, physiological and economic measures
B) Subjects were randomised into 2 intervention gp’s: 1. daily exercise at moderate intensity or 2. PCI with stent
C) healthy subjects were recruited at random and represented a good cross-section of population
D) exercise was shown to be equally effective as PCI but was better tolerated (less side effects)
E) the long term effects need further evaluation/ analysis

A

answer: C, D
A) TRUE: assessed measures: 1. clinical symptoms, 2. exercise capacity (functional) 3. coronary perfusion (physiological), 4. cost-effectiveness analysis (economic); Clinical end points: fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular and cerbrovascular events
B) TRUE: (n=43) cycling for 20min or more @ 70% of symptom free HR (i.e. 70% of subject’s maximal HR) ; PCI n=33)
C) FALSE: subjects were recruited after a “routine angioplasty”, hence were symptomatic at the time (ZW’s assumption), MALE <70yo only (n=101), (ZW unsure about ethnicity, etc. - see the orig. article if interested)
D) FALSE: exercise: SUPERIOR event-free survival (88% vs 70%,; p=0.023) and improved exercise capacity (+16%, p<0.001), at LOWER COST (1/2 the cost: almost 7k to improve 1 class of Canadian Cardiovasc. Soc. (CCS) w/ stent, almost 3.5k to improve 1 class of CCS w/ exercise, p=0.001), & reduced re-hospitalisations and revascularisations
E) TRUE; study duration was 12 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

With regards to Dansinger et al. study, JAMA 2005; choose all CORRECT statements from below:
A) Compared 4 of the most common weight loss programs and concluded that ITLC, such as Ornish’s SPECTRUM program, is the best approach for most
B) it was an RCT

A

Answer:
A) FALSE: Atkins, Ornish, WEight Watchers and Zone Diets were assessed for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction
B) FALSE: there was NO CONTROL group: 4 x n=40 for Atkins (low carb), Zone (macronutrient balance), Weight watchers (calorie restriction) Ornish (low fat, plant based)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Below are examples of key studies demonstrating benefits of LS interventions compared to conventional approaches. Match studies with their results (e.g. A-2):

A) Compared two common weight loss approaches (low-fat and low-carbohydrate diets), delivering intensive diet-focused intervention over 1 year. Similar weight loss was achieved by both groups at 12mo.
It also tested specific genotypes known to be assoc w/ insulin dynamic and macronutrient diet composition to see if these could influence wt loss. It showed absence of interaction between weight loss and genotype and between weight loss and baseline insulin.

B) This study demonstrated that short term FMD provokes epigenetic changes that modulate beta cell numbers and promote insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis with implications for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

C) Compared significant calorie-restriction (800kcal) + structured support (intervention) with best-practice care, as per UK guidelines (control) in OW/Obese subjects with T2D. Found that T2D remission was strongly assoc w/ wt loss and WT loss was better achieved by the intervention gp.

1) DiRECT RCT, Lean et al. Lancet 2018
2) DIETFITS RCT, Gardner
3) Cheng et al. Cell 2017

A

Answer:
A-2
B-3
C-1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Van Ommen et al.’s article “From Diabetes Care to Diabetes Cure” (Front Endocrinology 2018) reviews cure-focused interventions for type 2 diabetes and discusses the scientific technological advancements. All of the statements below are true, EXCEPT:

A) From a biological view, most of the processes involved in insulin resistance are reversible. This theoretically makes the disease reversible and curable by changing dietary habits and physical activity, particularly when adopted early in the disease process. Yet, this is not fully implemented and exploited
in health care due to numerous obstacles.
B) Authors argue that the implementation of lifestyle
as cure necessitates personalized and sustained lifestyle adaptations, which can only be
established by a systems approach.
C) The solution provided for type 2 diabetes is unique to T2D but it is such a prevalent condition that it justifies the change in system
D) The economic benefits have been clearly demonstrated by a 10-year study in T2D, yet the systems have failed to adapt

A
answer: C
A) TRUE
B) TRUE 
C) FALSE : this approach is translatable to other life-style related diseases. 
D) TRUE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

With regards to GEMINAL STUDY (Ornish et Al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008) choose CORRECT answer(s):
A) was a pivotal study demonstrating the effect of lifestyle modification at genetic level in men with early stage prostate cancer
B) only 30% of studied tissue had tumour cells, which renders the results questionable
C) one of the major limitations of GEMINAL Study is that it had no comparison group
D) The intervention was a low-fat, whole food, plant-based diet, participants were provided all of their food during the intervention period
E) one of the strengths was that supplementation with fish oil, and vitamins E and C, amongst other supplements, were given as part of intervention
F) genetic microarray clearly demonstrated down-regulation of a number of genes known to be associated with tumorigenesis (p < 0.05)
G) significant improvements in weight, abdominal obesity, blood pressure and lipid profile were observed (p < 0.05)

A

answer: A, C, F, G
A) TRUE
B) FALSE: this means that gene expression profiles are largely based on normal tissue, hence indicate that impact of lifestyle changes is not restricted to prostate cancer cells, however it is still considered a limitation of this study
C) TRUE
D) FALSE: multifaceted intervention: 1. low-fat (10% of calories from fat), whole food, plant-based diet, 2. Stress management, 60 minutes per day (gentle yoga-based stretching, breathing, meditation, imagery or progressive relaxation) 3. Moderate aerobic exercise (walking 30 minutes per day for six days per week) and A one hour group support session per week.
Participants were provided with all of their food during the intervention period.
E) FALSE: The diet was supplemented with soy (a daily serving of tofu plus 58 grams (2.04 ounces) of a fortified soy protein powdered beverage), fish oil (3 grams (0.1 ounces) daily), vitamin E (100 units daily), selenium (200 mg daily), and vitamin C (2 grams (0.07) daily). This can be seen as multiple interventions and makes it difficult to attribute effect size to any particular intervention.
F) TRUE: 453 genes downreg., 48 genes upreg: assoc w/ protein metabolisism and modification, intracell. protein traffic and protein phosphorylation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

With regards to DASH diet trial (Appel, NEJM 1997), all is correct EXCEPT:
A) recruited adults with essential hypertension
B) was a RCT with 3 different arms
C) DASH diet was found to be comparable to starting medications, hence adequate as a first-line treatment of mild to mod essent. HTN after 3-weeks
D) dose -response relationship was observed
E) even normotensive subjects showed reduction in BP

A

answer: A
A) FALSE: 459 adults; only appx 1/3 (or 133/459) of the subjects were hypertensive (def. as SBP >140, DBP >90) (ZW: one of the limitations of the study?); mild-mod HTN had to be less than <160/95;
B) TRUE: 1. control (Standard American Diet; plant-poor, lots of diary and Na) 2. diet rich in fruits and vegetables, 3. DASH “Combination” diet: low salt, low-fat diary, high plants
C) TRUE: DASH vs CONTROL in HTN subjects: reduced by mean of 11.4mmHg (SBP), 5.5 (DBP), p<0.001 for both
D) true, control diet worse outcomes, high-plant + normal diet intermed. outcomes, DASH (most strict) diet best outcomes
E) TRUE: 326 normotensive subjects showed smaller but statistically significant reduction in BP in DASH vs CONTROL (3.5 in SBP, 2.1 in DBP)

17
Q

With regards to COUNTERPOINT study (Lim et al. Diabetologia 2011), choose FALSE statement(s):
A) attempted to answer the question: Can severe dietary energy restriction reverse the abnormalities underlying T2D on cellular/ physiological level?
B) one of the limitations was that the study was done on mice, hence its findings are hard to apply to humans
C) the study found that beta cell function, as well as hepatic and pancreatic insulin sensitivity and fatty infiltration of liver and pancreas can all be reversed by using caloric restriction alone, maximum effects were observed after 8 weeks, (which was the end point of the study) but were evident from week 1 (first measurement)
D) the maximal beta-cell insulin response in the intervention group exceeded the response in non-diabetic control subjects at 8 weeks
E) while the results were dramatic and challenged the currently held views, small size of this study is one of its main limitations

A

answer: B
A) TRUE: outcomes: normalisation of beta-cell function and hepatic insulin sensitivity, as well as lowered hepatic and pancreatic fat infiltration; caloric limit = 600kcal /day!
B) FALSE: 11 human subjects (9 male, 2 female), w/ T2D and high BMIs, vs 8 matched non-diabetic controls
C) TRUE
D) TRUE:
E) TRUE (see above)

18
Q

With regards to the “LookAHEAD study” (Gregg et al JAMA 2012), choose all that apply:
A) compared a brief Intensive Lifestyle Intervention (ILI)- INTERVENTION, with Standard Diabetes Support and Education (DSE)- CONTROL
B) all recruited subjects had type 2 diabetes and were obese
C) primary outcome was frequency of partial or full remission from T2D to prediabetes or normoglycemia status, on NO diabetic medications
D) some of the observed secondary outcomes in the intervention group were: greater wt loss, increased fitness from baseline and compared to means of control gp
E) remission rates (partial or complete) were significantly higher in the intervention group compared to control group and were more sustained, however the absolute number of remissions were quite modest, leading many people to conclude that bariatric surgery is the only way to effectively treat T2DM in obese

A

answer: C, D, E
A) FALSE: RCT, adult subjects with dx of T2D, randomly assigned to INT (n=2241) or CONT (n=2262) gp, long term - 4-year follow up period
ILI= weekly gp and individ counselling 1st 6/12, then 3 sess/month for 6/12, then 2x/month + refresher gp series and campaigns years 2-4; reduced daily caloric intake (1200-1800 Kcal / day), reduced total and sat fat intake; 175min/week physical activity goal
DSE = 3 sess/ year on diet, phys. act and soc support
B) FALSE: 4503 subjects w/ T2D and BMI 25 or greater (=> overweight, not obese)
C) TRUE: FPG < 12.6mg/dl, or 7mmol/L, HbA1C < 6.5%
D) TRUE: all changes from baseline and p<0.05: wt loss at 1 year @1y 8%, @4 years 4%, fitness 15% more, @4y 6%
E) TRUE: ILI remission rates @ 1 y= 12%, 2y = 11%, 3y = 9%, 4y = 8%, however LS experts believe that caloric restriction of 1200-1800 Kcal/day is not intensive enough and studies such as DiRECT and COUNTERPOINT serve as proofs

19
Q

With regards to the Ornishes “telomerase study” Ornish et Al. Lancet Oncol 2013, choose INCORRECT statement(s):
A) it was a corss-sectional study which assessed 4365 healthy men for lifestyle and matched it to the telomerase length. It found a strong association between healthy lifestyle and increased telomerase length, indicating better health and longevity
B ) subjects were followed up after 5 years and strong dose-response was found between healthy lifestyle and longer telomerase, indicating that healthier lifestyle improves cellular markers of longevity
C) a major weakness of this study is it’s small size
D) while the results of this study demonstrate a dose-dependent relationship between comprehensive lifestyle changes and cellular aging, a much larger RCT is needed to make this information generalisable and applicable to clinical practice

A

answer: A
A) FALSE:
- subjects with biopsy-proven prostate cancer
- CONTROLLED trial (not randomised): 1. INTERVENTION (n=10): 3 months of ITLC, 2. EXTERNAL CONTROLS (n=25): standard surveillance
B) TRUE ; better adherence to ITLC correlated w/ longer telomerases, Controls telomerases shortened (all p’s <0.05), all after adjustment for age
C) TRUE
D) TRUE

20
Q

With regards to DIETFITS study (Gardner et al. JAMA 2018), choose CORRECT statement(s):
A) DIETFITS study compared two common weight loss approaches (low-fat and low-carbohydrate diets) in a Randomised Controlled Trial
B) a comprehensive ITLC was delivered over the course of 1 year
C) there was a very high completion rate, most likely due to “high appeal” of the intervention
D) Both intervention arms achieved weight loss. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. This shows that macronutrient composition of food is not crucial when it comes to weight loss.
E) It showed absence of interaction between weight loss and genotype and between weight loss and baseline insulin.

A

answer: D, E
A) FALSE: there were no controls (only two arms with different interventions) => randomised parallel design
B) FALSE: intensive (22 small group sessions in 12 months), diet-focused intervention was delivered over 1 year
C) FALSE: 79% completion rate over 12 months is exceptional for a nutrition study, this is most likely due to “intensive delivery” via frequent diet-specific small group sessions over the duration of the study
D) TRUE: caloric restriction and adherence seem to be more important, NB: authors of the Manual argue that these results are INCONSISTENT with similar analyses and that these results seem “implausible” that there is no interaction betw. macronutrient genotype and wt loss, they argue that there may have been confounding factors or that the study was underpowered
E) TRUE: In addition to gross weight loss, the study also tested specific genotypes known to be assoc w/ insulin dynamic and macronutrient diet composition to see if these could influence wt loss. No association between genotypes and weight loss was observed.

21
Q

With regards to DiRECT study (Lean et al, 2018, Lancet 2018), choose INCORRECT statement(s):
A) looked at the reversibility of T2D using intensive weight management within routine primary care, which makes it a very valuable study, as it makes its findings more generalisable than many other studies
B) Was a cluster-randomised trial
C) Intention-to-treat analysis was applied, this means that the data is more reflective or “real life”
D) Compared significant calorie-restriction (850kcal) + structured support (intervention) with best-practice care, as per UK guidelines (control) in OW/Obese subjects with T2D.
E) Found that T2D remission was strongly assoc w/ wt loss, and was “dose-dependent” i.e. the greater the wt loss, the greater the rates of remission, WT loss was better achieved by the intervention group
F) showed that more intensive lifestyle interventions are associated with better outcomes

A

answer:
A) TRUE
B) TRUE: participating practices (clusters of patients) were randomised to intervention or control groups; n=149 in each group,
C) TRUE: as the analysis includes drop outs, this underestimates the effect of intervention, hence makes findings stronger if positive association was found
D) TRUE: designed as 4-year study (ongoing), 850kcal/day for 3-5 months, then stepped food reintroduction (2-8weeks) + structured support
E) TRUE remission defined as: HbA1c <6.5% or <48mmol/mol, after 2 or more months off meds; remission INT 46% vs CONT 4% (p<0.0001)
- mean wt loss int gp 10kg, vs 1kg in control gp), p 0.0001
- no remission in those who gained weight; 7% in partic who lost 0-5kg, 86% in those who ost 15kg or more
F) TRUE e.g. compared w/ LookAHEAD study (6mo, 1200-1800 Kcal/day), DiRECT = 12mo, 800kcal/day of TOTAL DIET REPLACEMENT+ support

22
Q

With regards Cheng’s et al. study (Cell 2019), on fasting in diabetes, pick CORRECT statement(s):
A) examines whether cycles of the FMD can affect insulin production and glucose homeostasis in mice and humans
B) used a 5-day water-fast as the intervention
C) demonstrated that short term FMD provokes epigenetic changes that modulate beta cell numbers by reprograming cell lineage (converting support islet cells into functional, stable and insulin producing Beta cells) and thus promotes insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis with implications for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
D) produced solid evidence that T1 and T2 diabetes can be reversed with FMD

A

answer: A, C
A) TRUE
B) FALSE: short cycles (4 days FMD- 3days refeeding) of specifically designed diet (L-Nutra):
- based on the fact that FMD was previously found to be simulating physiological changes caused by fasting
- specifically formulated, plant-based meal replacements: Low-calorie, low-protein and low-carbohydrate but HIGH-FAT
- full diet replacements provided to subjects individually packaged by day
- serial bloods obtained
C) TRUE:
FMD causes changes in the levels of specific growth factors, glucose and ketone bodies (in humans and mice) these have EPIGENETIC effect (demonstrated in mice) on cell-lineage conversion from “supporting islet cells” to stable, functional, insulin-producing Beta cells, resulting in endogenic INSULIN PRODUCTION upon refeeding in BOTH T1 & T2 diabetes, restoration did not end with re-feeding
D) FALSE: Further research is needed to ascertain safety and effects of this intervention in humans, most data is from mice studies!!!
the Human component was a “tag-on” the study: ONLY 5 HEALTHY, human subjects who served as their own controls; pancreatic function and content compared before and after FMD

23
Q

Van Ommen et al.’s article “From Diabetes Care to Diabetes Cure” (Front Endocrinology 2018) reviews cure-focused interventions for type 2 diabetes and discusses the scientific technological advancements. All of the statements below are true, EXCEPT:
A) The authors recommend making a large change at global level
B) Author’s argue that current medical systems are based on insentivising ongoing care, rather than reversing the disease, hence there is no drive to change the current paradigm
C) The author’s argue that the economic impact of completely changing the paradigm may not be plausible for poorer countries
D) The author’s argue that the reversal of t2d needs to focus on 1. biological reversal using lifestyle as medicine, 2. coping with the environmental pressures (behaviour change) and 3. reduction of the environmental pressures (socioeconomic changes) , as well as empowering individuals with education and providing ongoing support

A

answer: A
A) FALSE: they recommend implementing change at the regional level, where all pieces are already available, rather than changing the global paradigm which has way too many obstacles atm
B) TRUE: “controlling the disease” by manipulating biochemical pathways with medications, rather than addressing root causes. This is costly and costs are ongoing…
C) FALSE: authors argue that the potential economic and other gains from focusing on curing T2D are strong and compelling. They argue that such refocus would definitely be economically viable. Moreover, economic benefits of lifestyle based intervention have been demonstrated in a 10 year study by Espeland et al, Diabetes Care, 2014
D) TRUE

24
Q

Van Ommen et al.’s article “From Diabetes Care to Diabetes Cure” (Front Endocrinology 2018) reviews cure-focused interventions for type 2 diabetes and discusses the scientific technological advancements. All of the statements below are true, EXCEPT:

A) authors use t2d as an example of a disease caused by the interaction between genetic predisposition and environmental pressure. Hence a reorientation of health research and care is needed from a reductionist approach, based on manipulating isolated biochemical pathways with medications, to a synchronised, system-driven, integrated, participatory and personalised approach.
B) authors identify difficulties sustaining lifestyle changes, particularly in the long term, as one of the major obstacles in changing the approach to life-style related diseases
C)
D) authors propose creating “ecosystems” ….,
xxxx

A
A) TRUE
B) TRUE: other barriers: 
1.  LACK OF ECONOMIC BENEFITS in the context of current health care model
2. failure to use a systems approach 
C) 
D) xxxxx
25
Q

With regards to INTERVENTIONS outlined in van Ommen at al 2018 article. Pick all that applies (CORRECT statements):
A) T2D is multifactorial and thus requires systems interventions; this implies that underlying causes are identified and addressed in a personalised and (chrono-)logical order
B) authors strongly advocate for a unified systems approach approach to treatment of T2D to reduce the cost, as majority of patients share the same driving forces, such as poor dietary choices, low level of physical activity, high stress levels
C) Interventions for lifestyle related diseases require consistent support and redirection towards goals from the expert, as it is often difficult for the patients to keep on track.
D) There is clear evidence that low carb diet leads to reversal of T2D
E) several micronutrients, such as vit D, Zinc, Magnesium, Omega 3s have been shown to be beneficial for T2D and can be safely prescribed routinely to aid in reaching reversal

A

Answer: A
A) TRUE
B) FALSE: “the efficacy of a systems approach is based on its individual components and a tailored analysis of best combination of components”
C) FALSE: interventions for lifestyle related diseases need to be based on self empowerment. Most externally imposed interventions are not sustainable. interventions should always aim to improve flexibility and/or resilience. This holds for both biology/ physiology and psychological aspects
D) FALSE: several studies (mostly 12 mo f/u), clear short term (4w to 6mo) benefit on glucose and wt. but in the long term not superior to high-carb diets for glucose, wt or insulin resistance. High protein diets not recommended (overstimulate pancreas and may worsen periph ins resist). “manipulating macronutrients without caloric restriction does not cure T2D”.
E) FALSE: yes, several macro nutrients and non-nutrients have been shown to improve glucose control, insulin secretion and inflammation but these should be in theory obtained from a healthy diet. Tailored prescription is ok.

26
Q

With regards to INTERVENTIONS outlined in van Ommen at al 2018 article. All applies, EXCEPT:
A) There is no doubt that caloric restriction and weight reduction of 5% or more ameliorate metabolic anomalies in T2D. However, long-term adherence to caloric restriction poses a major barrier.
B) Evidence on fasting and FMDs is inconclusive and clinical use of this intervention is strongly discouraged by the authors.
C)Adverse effects of intermittent fasting have been reported in healthy, non-obese subjects incl. incr levels of free fatty acids and IGT, suggesting that IF should only be applied in metabolically inflexible persons.
D) Evidence, such as reversal of T2D after bariatric surgery, suggests that rapid weight loss leads to detectable reduction of inflammation and improved metabolic function
E) Degree of insulin resistance in different organs of the body can vary significantly (different phenotypes). This tissue specific insulin tolerance dictates that different phenotypes respond to different interventions; e.g. predominantly muscle-cell insulin resistance responds well to physical activity and low-fat diet, primarily hepatic intolerance responds well to VLCD

A

Answer: B

A) TRUE
B) FALSE: Currently available evidence strongly supports the clinical potential of periodic fasting as an effective and safe alternative to chronic restriction of calories. FMD’s (Fasting Mimicking Diet) may be a feasible mode to implement this.
Profound metabolic benefits of fasting (intermittent and periodic, several different regimes) have been well documented in pre-clinical trials. Fasting has been shown to be effective in wt loss, improving insulin sensitivity and decreasing cardiovasc risk in both non-dm and dm subjects.
C) TRUE
D) TRUE: However, evidence suggests that positive metabolic and anti-inflammatory effects can be achieved by fasting, without overall caloric restriction, hence are not solely attributable to wt loss and must be driven by other mechanisms.

27
Q

With regards to INTERVENTIONS outlined in van Ommen at al 2018 article. All applies, EXCEPT:
A) there is strong evidence for the benfits of physical activity (PA) on insulin resitstac, T2D, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and obesity .
B) different activities can achieve specific metabolic health improvements (e.g. HIIT shown to reduce liver fat, walking (60min/day) improves peripheral insulin sensitivity, endurance training improvs visceral fat in T2D). This can be deployed in personalised treatment plans.
C) As well as improving metabolic health, physical activity has been shown to attenuate inflammation ; this is thought to be one of the mechanisms in which PA improves T2D
D) all of the ebove are true

A

answer: D (all are true)

28
Q

With regards to INTERVENTIONS outlined in van Ommen at al 2018 article. All applies, EXCEPT:
A) Plant-based diets almost immediately reduce the need for insulin in “insulin-dependent” T2D
B) very strict calorie restriction (600kCAL/day) restores plasma glucose conc to normal in T2D in 1 week
C) patients who choose to adopt lifestyle changes often need to adapt their medications
D) dramatic lifestyle change and medications should not be combined, as it could result in significant adverse effects

A

Answer: D is FALSE : medications may need adjustment in dose or be given PRN, approach should be very much individualised