MBE Practice Exam Missed Questions Flashcards
If a eyewitness identifies the defendant out of court to the police officer, and is present in the court room and subject to cross, can the police officer testify as to the witness’s statement?
Yes. A declarant’s prior statement identifying someone she perceived earlier is not hearsay if the declarant is now testifying and subject to cross-examination about the prior statement.
Is a TRO appealable?
Ordinarily, the granting or denying of a temporary restraining order is not immediately appealable because, as the name implies, a temporary restraining order is not an injunction that is appealable. A TRO is valid for 14 days, unless extended for GC. If extended for GC, courts have held that a TRO is effectively converted into a preliminary injunction and thus becomes immediately appealable.
Is contributory negligence an affirmative defense and when must it be raised?
Yes, must be raised in the answer
If an plaintiff is injured by a product, the manufacturer changes the design after, and at trial alleges that the design could not have been changed, is the subsequent remedial measure admissible?
Yes. Generally, subsequent remedial measures are inadmissible. However, they are admissible for other purposes, such as, to rebut a claim that the repair or precaution was not feasible.
If a contractor completes his end of the contract, and the homeowner honestly believes there were defects and departures, and offers to pay a lower amount in full settlement of the change, is that allowable?
Yes. Generally, a common law contract requires a modification to be supported by new consideration. The promise to refrain from suing on a claim may constitute adequate consideration. As long as the claimant reasonably believed and in GF believes his claim was valid.
What does then existing state of mind comprise of and is it an exception or an exclusion?
Then existing state of mind includes things such as motive, intent, or emotion. It is an exception to the hearsay rule.
Impracticability/Impossibility in Contracts
The occurrence of an unanticipated or extraordinary event that may make contractual duties impossible or impracticable. You needs to show
(i) extreme and unreasonable difficulty and/or expense and
(ii) its nonoccurrence was a basic assumption of the parties
If parent’s parental rights are terminated, can they claim a Due Process violation?
Yes. The SCOTUS has held that the Constitution includes a fundamental right of privacy, and the fundamental right of privacy includes the right of parents to the companionship, care, custody, and control of their children. question
What if a party does not have sufficient facts to oppose a MSJ?
The nonmovant can show by affidavit or declaration that he cannot present facts essential to justify his opposition to the motion and he can ask the court to defer action or deny the motion and allow time to obtain affidavits or declarations or take discovery.
When is expert testimony admissible?
If
1. the subject is one where scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge would help the trier of fact understand the evidence or determine a fact in issue
2. the opinion is based on sufficient facts or data
3. the opinion is the product of reliable principles and methods and
4. the expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts
Can a expert testify about ultimate issues?
Generally, the expert is not prohibited from giving an opinion as to the ultimate issue in the case (although there is a limited exception for testimony as to a criminal Ds mental state).
In a construction contract, if a property owner breaches, what is the builder entitled to?
The builder is entitled to any profit he would have derived from the contract plus any costs he has incurred to date. If the builder has mitigated damages, any losses that are avoided must be subtracted from this amount.
What does the right to travel encompass?
The right of newly arrived citizens to enjoy the same privileges as are enjoyed by the other citizens of that state. (14th amendment).
Is contributory negligence a defense to intentional torts?
NO, only self defense, defense of others, defense of property (limited), public and private necessity, and consent
If a man gives his attorney an executed deed, conveying his property to his daughter, and instructs the atty to give it to his daughter on his death unless he states otherwise, what is wrong?
To make an effective delivery of an inter vivos gift, the grantor must relinquish absolute and unconditional control. This is not the case here because the man reserved the right to alter by stating “unless he states otherwise.”
If a plaintiff files a claim and is assigned a judge, and later realizes that judge is not optimal, can they remove the case to federal court?
No, plaintiff’s cannot remove cases.
When a case filed in state court contains claims that would arise under federal law and state law claims that do not invoke diversity or supplemental jdx, may the federal court still hear the state law claims with the federal?
No, although the entire case can be removed to federal court, the federal court then must sever the cases and remand the state law claim.
Invasion of privacy wrongs
- appropriation of the Ps likeness or name for the Ds commercial advantage
- intrusion by the D on the Ps affairs or seclusion
- publication by the D of facts placing the P in a false light and
- public disclosure of private facts
Will a purchase money mortgage for land take precedence of a prior recorded judgment lien?
Yes.
Test for Commercial Speech
The regulation will be valid only if (1) it serves a substantial government interest, (2) it directly advances that interest, and (3) is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest
Is assumption of risk an affirmative defense to abnormally dangerous activites?
Yes, a plaintiff who knowingly and voluntarily assumes the risk of injury caused by the conduct may be subject to the defense of assumption of risk
When is character evidence admissible when the acts are independently relevant?
To show Motive, Intent, Mistake (absence of), Identity, and Common plan or scheme (MIMIC)
Can a state impose a burden on a criminal defendant to prove an affirmative defense?
Yes. Due Process does not preclude this.
If a plaintiff is injured, but cant show which defendant caused the injury, will her claim survive a motion for directed verdict?
No. Even with Res Ipsa Loquitor, the P would have to show that the object was in the Ds control. Otherwise, for multiple Ds, the P would have to show that the Ds were acting jointly in tortious conduct.
Definition of Obscenity
A description or depiction of sexual conduct that, taken as a while by the average person, applying contemporary community standards (1) appeals to the prurient interest in sex (2) portrays sex in a patently offensive way and (3) using a national standard, does not have serious literary, political, or scientific value
Which comparative negligence rule for the MBE?
Pure Comparative Negligence - weigh the plaintiff’s negligence against the defendant’s and reduce the damages accordingly