Maths Flashcards

1
Q

what are the different areas of domain general symbolic abilities?

A

General intelligence: ability to learn new things; Language abilities; Working memory: ability to manipulate information in mind eg. Adding up numbers while holding the numbers in mind; Spatial abilities: understanding the spatial relationship between objects or space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the different areas of domain general non-symbolic abilities?

A

number sense. Ability to discriminate between amounts very quickly without counting: Subitizing: small numbers up to 3 or 4. Object tracking: ability to keep track of small numbers. ANS: larger amounts, relies on ratio, the size and the distance between numbers. Also present in newborns and animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

describe approximate number sense

A

Animals and preverbal infants have the ability to discriminate between quantities, using a non-symbolic system that relies upon approximate number representations; Approximate ‘fuzzy’ representation; Abstract; Universal; Support arithmetic; Biological basis; Connected to verbal representations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

describe parallel individuation system

A

Tracking small numbers (Hyde)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what did Xu & Spelke (2000) find about infant habituation?

A

habituated to a number of dots. 50% less looking time over 3 consecutive trials relative to 1st three trails or until 14 trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what did McCtink & Wynn (2004) discover about addition and subtraction?

A

9 month olds. infant who saw addition looked longer at 5 than 10 and infants who saw subtraction looked longer at 10 than 5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what did Starkey & Cooper (1980) discover about sensitivity to number?

A

5 to 6 month-old infants showed sensitivity to number. infants look longer when number changes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what did Clearfield & Mix (1999) discover about numerical cues etc?

A

6-8 month infants shown displays of 2 or 3 objects varying in contour length looked longer at change in contour length than number. discriminate using perceptual non-numerical cues. use cues that naturally co-vary with number eg. volume, area, length. can’t represent discrete number and instead represent continuous quantities in terms of overall amount

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what did Feigenson & Carey (2005) discover about object tracking?

A

12.5 months old can object track with 2 objects, 3 objects, but not 4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what did Wynn (1992) discover about infant arithmetic?

A

those who saw 1+1 looked longer when 1 doll was revealed than 2. those who saw 2-1 looked longer when 2 dolls were revealed than 1. they expected correct result of the transformation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what did Wakeley, Rivera & Langer (2000) discover about infant arithmetic, contrary to the previous research by (Wynn, 1992)?

A

maybe infants expected a change. Showed infants: 3-1=1 and 3-1=2, 1+1=3 and 1+2=3. No difference in looking times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what did Piffer, Agrillo & Hyde (2012) discover about other species having ANS and tracking systems?

A

Guppies prefer to be closer to more guppies rather than less
o 5 vs 10: yes (ANS)
o 3 vs 4: yes (tracking)
o 3 vs 5: no (across systems)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what did Uller, Urquhar, Lewis & Bernsten (2013) discover about infant’s understanding of number density?

A

10 month old infants given some more cookies to play with. they prefer more cookies more dense in chocolate chips

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what did Piaget (1953) discover in his counting experiments?

A

Use counting words without understanding what they mean.
DO NOT understand cardinal number, one-to-one correspondence.
Do NOT understand the logic of number and counting until at least age 6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what did Gelman and Neck (1983) discover about puppet counting?

A

most 3-4 year old children judged the puppet counted correctly for correct trials and pseudo-error trials
most 3-4 year old children judged the puppet counted incorrectly for one-to-one violations, stable-order violate trials, cardinal violations
showed sensitivity to counting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what were the different errors the puppet could make (Gelman and Neck, 1983)?

A

o Stable-order principle violated
o Cardinal principle violated
o Pseudo-error trial

17
Q

what did Wynn (1990) discover about counting?

A
  • Asked to give 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 objects
  • 2 year olds only correct on 1 and 2 – did not count
  • Majority of 3 year olds were correct
18
Q

what did Posid & Cordes (2015) discover about counting?

A
  • Tested 3-4 and 5-6
  • All proficient counters on “Find me a ___” (up to 6) – Wynn, 1992
  • Asked to give 6 or 12
  • Better when the same
19
Q

what did Bryant, Christie & Rendu (1999) discover about the predictors of maths? such as logic?

A

understand inverse relations to understand addition and subtraction
to understand the ordinal nature of number, they realise that adding a number and subtracting the same number moves the number up and down a scale by the same amount

20
Q

what were the 6 different trials in Bryant, Christie & Rendu (1999) when looking at the predictors of maths?

A

♣ Concrete/identical: plastic bricks (told how many so couldn’t count) – same end
♣ Concrete/nonidentical: added to one end and subtracted from the other
♣ Invisible/identical: no concrete material (told were adding men); hand movements
♣ Invisible/nonidentical: no concrete materials and added from other side; hand movements
♣ Word problems
♣ Abstract

21
Q

what did Muldoon, Lewis & Towse (2005) discover about sharing?

A

• 3-4 year olds
• Set comparisons
• If told same in other,3 year olds would count, 4 year olds would not
• Age, counting proficiency, sharing proficiency -> cardinal inferences
• 52 months, 58 months at time 3 (3 times)
• Procedural skills:
o Sharing 10-14 items
o Counting 10/20 items
• Children improve over time
• Sharing predicts time 1 and time 2 cardinal inference

22
Q

what did Nunes et al. (2011) discover about what predicts deaf children’s working memory?

A

• WM (8 6) (repeats 4 digits in backwards order)
• Intelligence (8 6) (WISC)
• Arithmetic (8 6) (A shop had 25 cartoons of milk and sold 14. How many are left?)
• Reasoning (8 9)
• Maths – KS2 (11) and KS3 (14)
All predict

23
Q

What predicts low-income children’s abilities on high-stakes maths? (Fyfe, Rittle-Johnson & Farran, 2018)

A
•	Nursery:
o	Repeating patterns
o	Non-symbolic quality (which has more?)
•	Year 1:
o	Symbolic mapping (2 to 2 dots)
o	Calculation
24
Q

what did Starr, Libertus & Brannon (2013) discover about predictors of maths in children?

A

o Individual differences in ANS predict number counting of up to 6 items, basic calculation, number comparisons at 3.5 years

25
Q

what did Navarro, Braham & Libertus (2018) discover about parents’ acuity?

A
  • 56 1-3 year old (ANS)
  • Parents also completed ANS (select how many have more dots quickly)
  • Correlation of .32
26
Q

what did Van Herwegen et al (2017) discover about whether we can teach ANS?

A
  • 2-4 year olds
  • Pre-tested and post-tested on ANS (which side has more)
  • Played number games for 5 weeks at nursery or read books with researcher
  • Children improved in ANS
27
Q

what did Hannula, Lepola & Lehtinen (2010) discover about spontaneous focusing on numerosity (SFON)?

A

6.5 and 8.5 years. Looked at maths and reading as outcomes. Predicts arithmetic skills but not reading skills in grade 2

28
Q

what did Braham, Libertus & McCrink (2018) discover about SFON?

A
  • 54 children and parents
  • 2.97 to 5.27 years (M = 4.14 years, SD = 7.29 months)
  • Visit Manhattan Children’s Museum
  • SFON
  • Two conditions
29
Q

what did Saxe (1988) discover in the Brazilian candy sellers study?

A
  • Numbers: standard orthography numbers (2000 versus 15000): urban nonsellers
  • Numbers occluded on bills: Urban sellers and non sellers
  • Adding/subtracting bills (if you started the day with this money, how much is it?): urban sellers
  • Ratios using money