Manager selection and other Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Due diligence on investment manger

A

emphasize the sources and reasons behind the actual returns generated in the past
- must be an evaluation on the probability of repeated earnings sufficient or better returns in the future using the same inv. process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Manager universe

A

consist of only those manager who are subtle for the portfolio in terms of the objectives and constraints of the IPS, style and will reconcile between active and passive approaches.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

approaches to assign a pm to a benchmark

A
  1. 3rd party categorization
  2. return-based style analysis
  3. Holding’s based style analysis
  4. manager experience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Quant analysis

A
  • evaluate objectively in terms of distribution of past returns
  • perf attribution and appraisal
  • capture ratio examine performance in both good and weak market conditions
    = check for any significant drawdowns (peak-through decline in terms for specific time period)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

quantitative analysis issue

A
  1. what is the likelihood that the same level of returns will continue in the future
  2. does the manager’s inv. process accurate for all the relevant risks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Philosophy:

A

focus on a specific arcade of market inefficiency to earn excess returns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

process / people

A

determine whether the strategy is feasible and if it’s possible to execute the strategy with given knowledge and skills of the employees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

portfolio

A

must be built in way that is consistent with the philosophy and process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Type I Error

reject null, no value added

A

ho: no value added

retain the manager with no skill

receive much more attention than type iI because:

  • notion of regret aversion by the decision maker
  • an error of commission
  • result exploit cost
  • transparent to investor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

type iI error

null is not rejected, when in fact there was value added

A

fire the manager with skill

  • errors of omission
  • result in implicit/ opportunity cost
  • not measurable
  • not transparent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

preventing type iI error

A

indicative of problems with the hiring and firing of managers

solution:
track the subsequent performance of managers who were not hired as well as those who were fired.
It is important not to hire or fire managers because of short term performance or because of behavior bias.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

cost of type I and II errors

A

the greater the different in sample size and mean, the greater the cost of Type i and iI errors

  • the wider the dispersion of returns between strong and weak managers, the easier its to distinguish between their relative skills
  • decrease the difference in sample size and mean, increase std, the decrease the expected cost
  • more efficient markets exhibits smaller difference in the dispersion of skilled and unskilled PM, result in lower costs

Type ii error occur i mean-reverting markets when strong managers are fired or managers who have weaker ST performance are fired and they subsequently outperform when market goes up.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Returns-based style analysis RBSA

A

Top-down approach that involve estimating the risk exposure from a n actual return rises for a given period.

adv:
straightforward, typically does not require a large amount of additional data, or difficult to acquire data

disadvantage:

  1. lack precision
  2. may not reflect the current or future portfolio exposures
  3. if the portfolio contains liquid securities, stale, prices may understate the risk exposure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Holding-based style analysis HSBA

A

(most appropriate for equity based strategies)

Bottom up approach that estimates the risk exposures from the actual securities held in the portfolio at a point in time.

adv:

  1. it allows for the estimation of current risk factors, proving an accurate view of the PM’s risk exposure
  2. comparable across PM and through time

disadvantage:
1. more computational effort required
2. high dependence on the degree of transparency provided by pM
3. stale pricing and window dressing
4. not appropriate if the portfolio has high turnover

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

capture ratio

> 1 POSTIVE asymmetry convex

A

determine how suitable a manager is with respect to the investor’s risk tolerance and time horizon

UC (upside ) look at capture when benchmark has positive return

UC > 1 outperformance

DC look at capture when benchmark has a negative return

DC < 1 outperformance

  • can be used to confirm investment strategy

high beta, momentum-driven strategies, should have increase UC than value driven strategies, high UC and DC

low beta will have low UC and DC.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Drawdown

A

a low-beta strategy may have lower absolute return but low risk in the form of lower drawdowns may result in better risk-add returns

  • useful for identifying poor/poorly executed investment strategies, weak internal controls, and operational problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

investment philosophy

A

exploit inefficiencies in financial market to generate excess return

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

behavioral inefficiency

A

mis-pricing caused by other investors and their behavior bias, st in nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Structural inefficiency

A

offer because of laws and regulations, which can make them LT in nature

Given the amount of inefficient assets compared with the AUM of managers likely to exploit them provides some assurance that the inefficiency is repeatable. It would likely take some time for the inefficiency to converge to efficient valuation. The infrequent nature of the inefficiency and the zero marginal return suggest that the inefficiency is probably not worthwhile to pursue.

20
Q

Idea generation

A

unique info adv, trendy, and interpreted differently

21
Q

idea implementation/ signal capture

A

idea transformed into a investment position

2 key concerns:
repeatability process
its consistent with investment philosophy to determination and approval of investment position

22
Q

portfolio constitution

A

risk mgmt
consistent with inv. philosophy and process
allocation of long and short position
AUM increase overtime

23
Q

monitor the portfolio

A

hard stop losses, program make decisions

soft stop loses, human engagement required

24
Q

operational due diligence

A

i. firm
must operate as a successful business to ensure sustainability

a small firm that is independent owned may have greater flexibility than a large organization, but it may have a higher cost structure and lack financial support during market events

ii. investment vehicle SMAs vs. pooled investment
iii. evaluation of investment’s streams

25
Q

pooled investment

A
  • bring together funds from all investors in one (MF, ETFs, HF)
  • no custimization
  • payment of accrued taxes in unrealized gains maybe required
26
Q

SMA:

A
  • hold funds of 1 investor in a separate account
  • higher transaction costs
  • provide control, customization, tax efficiency, separate reporting and greater transparency
  • allow client- specific objective/ constraints
  • require an extra layer of due diligence

disadvantage:
- cost additional operation burden
- tracking risk: large asset required to fully replicate the index performance
- investment behavioral: subject to behavioral bias as they are unprofessional

27
Q

investment streams

A

liquidity from high to low:

  • close-end fund
  • ETFs

-open-ended funds

  • HF (redemption lockup period and gates)
    adv: ability to have long inv. horizon not allowing investor to overreact to ST
    -invesmtnt in liquid premium
    disadvantage
  • impaired ability to change portfolio allocations in response to change in the market
  • PE
  • VC fund due to capital calls
28
Q

fee structure/ performance fees

symmetrical structure with full upside and downside exposure

A

fee = base + performance sharing

the greater alignment between investor and manager incentives, but higher risk to manager due to full downside exposure

29
Q

bonus with full upside and limited downside exposures

A

fee = max( base, base + sharing of positive perf)

30
Q

bonus with limited upside and downsize potential

A

fee = max ( base, base + sharing of positive performances with limit)

31
Q

STD underestimate downside risk

A

(BEI active return - base fee) * sharing
= performance fee / base fee
= total billed fee

= long call on the portfolio return with a strike = based fee

32
Q

liquidity profiling and time-to-cash tables

A
  1. determine potential cash in/outflows
  2. establish a timeline that involves constrains a liquidity classification schedule (time-to-cash table)
    - amount of time needed to convert asset to cash
    - liquidity classification level
    - liquidity budget
33
Q

rebalancing and commitment

A

systematic rebalancing policies
-maintain LT strategies asset allocation

calendar and % range rebalancing with pre-determined acceptable ranges for various asset classes

automated adj. mechanisms - keep the portfolio risk profile relatively constant if there’s change from the target commitments

34
Q

street testing

A

based on any combination of history, statistical model, and scenario analysis

35
Q

derivatives

A

ideal method for rebalancing

a future overlay for rebalancing of many (but not all) asset classes without altering any of the asset allocation.

36
Q

liquidity premium increase with time horizon

A

value of put option

where the strike price is the marketable price of the liquidity asset

illiquid asset price = marketable asset- put price
illiquidity premium % = expected return on illiquid asset % - expected return on market asset %

37
Q

taking a long future position requires only minimum cash requirement for magin

A

form of leverage investment

any cash not require for margins can be used to inv. in other assets with differing levels of liquidity, or to meet other liquidity requirement

38
Q

options can be purchase at premium that are

A

only a fraction of the cost of underlying asset, thereby securing as a form of leverage.
Options can be sold to earn premium income that helps to generate liquidity.

39
Q

For P/E, capital calls are greater than capital distributions

A

resulting in a greater concentration of private equity

certain investment made by pm may restrict investors from withdrawing the funds during stressed market conditions, which decrease the polio’s overall liquidity.

40
Q

PE are not valued as frequent as public equity

A

activation of gates

the smoothing effect

41
Q

Time weighted return original Dizfz = R=

A

(EMV- BMV- CF)

/ (BMV+ 0.5 CF)

42
Q

Modified Dizfz: R-

A

(EMV-BMV-CF)

/ (BMV+ SUM OF wi* CFi)

43
Q

Aggregated method Rbmv+cf

A

= sum of EMV - sum of bmv - sum of cash flow

/ sum of BMv + sum(cash flow * wi)

44
Q

3 reasons deterioration may occur

A
  • for private equity capital calls are greater than capital distribution, resulting a greater concentration of PE in the portfolio
  • certain investment made by the pm may restrict investor from withdraw their funds during stressed market conditions, which decrease the portfolio overall liquidity

-PE investment are not valued as frequent. The lagged valuation mean there is a relation increase as % of portfolio and a relative low liquidity asset as a % of portfolio during stressed market condition. The % of asset available for meeting liquidity needs is reduced.

45
Q

Tracking error perspective

A

ETF face tracking error for reasons such as cash drag, and mandatory diversification

futures : liquidity and interest rate differentials

total return swap: have no tracking error